Originally Posted By billth777:
Cloward Piven.

Originally Posted By M15A2CLE:


It is about keeping people from under educating, beating and raping their own children which happens now in rural America for many reasons, but mostly for religious ideology or expansion of these far off center ideologies through child birth without commingling with people that aren't of the same morals.

. That said, I think employers or government should fund the burden of child care outside the home. Employers are the better solution as I really don't think dropping kids off to go prostitute, or sell drugs is quite the economic solution we are looking for.

It is about keeping people from under educating, beating and raping their own children which happens now in rural America for many reasons, but mostly for religious ideology or expansion of these far off center ideologies through child birth without commingling with people that aren’t of the same morals.

Originally Posted By M15A2CLE:
You can buy into what this guy is saying. It is a free country in some ways, but if you ignore his voice in the video, you can see he is stealing a forum on democratic socialist ideals of government support for all families, starting with impoverished families, funded by the wealthiest non-income earners.

This is standard democratic mindset, agree of not. It is not about stealing your children and making them wards of the state.

It is about keeping people from under educating, beating and raping their own children which happens now in rural America for many reasons, but mostly for religious ideology or expansion of these far off center ideologies through child birth without commingling with people that aren’t of the same morals.

They do expand this socio economic viewpoint into women raised in urban poverty who usually strapped with poverty and a drug addiction flare out as parents leaving homeless and dead kids in their wake. Unlike these dsa folks, I assign this mostly to poverty and poverty community decision making, not 100% to the availability of free abortions and child drop off. That said, I think employers or government should fund the burden of child care outside the home. Employers are the better solution as I really don’t think dropping kids off to go prostitute, or sell drugs is quite the economic solution we are looking for.

That said, as long as you align to dipshits spouting crap on YouTube, dominating 90% of the video with their own voice, we will never come together as a society and we will continue to give power to the extremes and become a disarmed, impoverished, poor mass of workers for the extremes.

Originally Posted By Currahee:
Remember, communists don't just jump out of helicopters.

Threads like make me train harder.

Originally Posted By LibertyShip:
Children and family divide one's loyalty.  Are you loyal to your family or to the State?  Is the loyalty of your child to you, or to the State? All loyalty must be to the state!

In "The Gulag Archipelago," Solzhenitsyn described why in the Union of the Soviet Socialist States (Soviet Union) even owning a DOG was against the programme:

Copypaste from the book:

"In the consistent struggle against the individuality of a man, first they deprived him of one friend — the horse, promising a tractor in its place. As if a horse were only draft power for a plow, and not, instead, your living friend in sorrow and happiness, a member of your family, part of your own heart! And soon afterward they began a persistent campaign against his second friend — the dog. Dogs had to be registered; they were hauled off to the skinners; and often special teams from the local soviets simply shot dead every dog they came across. And there were no hygienic or miserly economic reasons for this — the basis was much more profound: After all, a dog doesn’t listen to the radio, doesn’t read the papers; he is a citizen who is, so to speak, beyond the control of the state, a physically strong one, moreover, but his strength goes not to the state but to defend his master as an individual , without regard to any kind of decree that might be issued against him in the local soviet and any kind of warrant they might come to him with at night."

Originally Posted By _DR:



Solzhenitsyn should be required reading in every high school and college.

Originally Posted By doc540:
This has been the Democrat's plan since the '30's

Originally Posted By networkguru:
commies walk among us.