I love being right about covid shots being BS (Page 5 of 5)
|
Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Um.. did you actually read it? Because that's not what it said. The shots were oversold. But despite the religious level fervor and mantra here, they weren't completely ineffective at the time. Cherry picking text from his notes, when the rest of the quoted article doesn't even support it, undermines and weakens the ANTI-VAX case strength and credibility. In the same manner the pro-SHOT team lost credibility by cherry-picking broad claims of exaggerated effectiveness. yet, here, any degree of claim so long as supports the mantra, is greeted with complete lack of internal vetting and credibility / consistency expectations and standards on this topic. Basically, you're being played and supporting that, as bad as the other side was. It's a religion here. Amplifed by the credible disgust at the tyranny of the force vaccinations - I'll grant and share that much, at least. Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. i didn’t get jabbed. I had a conversation with my doctor that I’m not taking a new vaccine that was supposedly made in weeks. Real vaccines are worked on for years and years before being approved or scrapped because of failures to immunize or too great a risk package. I worked for the state. Toward the second half of the covid event I and others were being told we were getting locked out despite the fact that we were working from home. Our only other option was weekly covid testing on our dime. They were getting brave arm twisting. I was retirement eligible so I was nudged to put my retirement papers in a few months earlier than my original plans. F em. The union eventually won that fight but that was just one straw of many with the assholes in the governor’s office. No ragerts! |
|
Originally Posted By gearjammer351: I'd already had covid before the "vaccine" was available (it wasn't that bad). My doctor told me not to get it for that reason. I still had people feeling me I was an asshole and deserved to die for avoiding it. When they tried the "listen to the science" crap, I asked, "You mean, like the actual DOCTOR who has kept up with the research and knows my medical history - who advised against it?" They'd just grumble or continue the MSM talking points. That's how I knew it wasn't about the science(tm) to them anymore. Same, I had it I’m sure in Nov. and Dec. before the news of it hit. Probably the snottiest flu I ever had. Tons of gunk to expel. It lasted a month give or take, the clearing up was a slow gradual process, glacially slow. I also thought I was having heart issues but it was likely my O2 levels. I’d get up and take several steps and would take a knee and brace on the wall or I was going to black out. That was enough to schedule an appointment with my doc and a heart referral. This was two to three weeks in to the covid flu. Then what was it Feb or March and it hit the news cycle? I was like hey! That’s about what I had. Then I had it again probably twice more that was more like the regular sniffles. Work was a pin in the ass. We had to self report every day whether we had any symptoms before being allowed to work. I got exposed by a friend one day and got a health department quarantine order to stay home. Work was ok that time. The next time when I actually had symptoms of something on their self report I got a work imposed quarantine from the state employee office. My agency then accused me that it was an illicit ploy at a vacation because I’d already used their allotted quarantine days. WTF? I didn’t ask to be barred from work and it wasn’t malicious compliance either. You mandate I complete the daily health questionnaire and I have done so. agh, BS. I like being retired now, no more of that double standard crap! |
|
Originally Posted By Boognish: What a crazy time. I remember being very quiet when everyone on conference calls were talking about their vaccines and leaving work to go get them. I was very afraid that people would ask me about it and I would either have to lie or tell them that I’m not getting one and face the backlash/ostracism. Fortunately it never came up. A good friend of mine bought into the whole thing and we really haven’t been on the same terms since he asked me about it and I told him I never got the shot. Honestly I have my wife to thank for none of us ever getting it. She was incredibly opposed. I am very grateful. The old timers at the gun club were driving two hours so they could get their shots right away. |
|
Originally Posted By SteelonSteel: Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. i didn’t get jabbed. I had a conversation with my doctor that I’m not taking a new vaccine that was supposedly made in weeks. Real vaccines are worked on for years and years before being approved or scrapped because of failures to immunize or too great a risk package. I worked for the state. Toward the second half of the covid event I and others were being told we were getting locked out despite the fact that we were working from home. Our only other option was weekly covid testing on our dime. They were getting brave arm twisting. I was retirement eligible so I was nudged to put my retirement papers in a few months earlier than my original plans. F em. The union eventually won that fight but that was just one straw of many with the assholes in the governor’s office. No ragerts! My union didn't care that we may be forced to get vaxed. Pretty eye opening. Fortunately it never go to that point |
“A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” James 1:8 KJV
"Can a man who's warm understand one who's freezing?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
"Can a man who's warm understand one who's freezing?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
|
Originally Posted By SteelonSteel: Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. ....! Originally Posted By SteelonSteel: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Um.. did you actually read it? Because that's not what it said. The shots were oversold. But despite the religious level fervor and mantra here, they weren't completely ineffective at the time. Cherry picking text from his notes, when the rest of the quoted article doesn't even support it, undermines and weakens the ANTI-VAX case strength and credibility. In the same manner the pro-SHOT team lost credibility by cherry-picking broad claims of exaggerated effectiveness. yet, here, any degree of claim so long as supports the mantra, is greeted with complete lack of internal vetting and credibility / consistency expectations and standards on this topic. Basically, you're being played and supporting that, as bad as the other side was. It's a religion here. Amplifed by the credible disgust at the tyranny of the force vaccinations - I'll grant and share that much, at least. Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. ....! We are in agreement. |
|
Originally Posted By lazyengineer: We are in agreement. Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By SteelonSteel: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Um.. did you actually read it? Because that's not what it said. The shots were oversold. But despite the religious level fervor and mantra here, they weren't completely ineffective at the time. Cherry picking text from his notes, when the rest of the quoted article doesn't even support it, undermines and weakens the ANTI-VAX case strength and credibility. In the same manner the pro-SHOT team lost credibility by cherry-picking broad claims of exaggerated effectiveness. yet, here, any degree of claim so long as supports the mantra, is greeted with complete lack of internal vetting and credibility / consistency expectations and standards on this topic. Basically, you're being played and supporting that, as bad as the other side was. It's a religion here. Amplifed by the credible disgust at the tyranny of the force vaccinations - I'll grant and share that much, at least. Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. ....! We are in agreement. Both are problematic for their own reasons.
The mandated and doctor recommended COVID-19 shot for pregnant women was effectively an abortion shot according to new documents just released by Senators Johnson and Paul. “The authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data. These figures mirror the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU-486.” More shedding anecdotes:
It wasn't just those who got vaccinated. I believe unvaccinated pregnant women who spent a lot of time around the vaccinated, suffered from shedding. My d-i-l had 4 healthy pregnancies and no problem with the 5th until all her co-workers were vaccinated. That weekend she lost the baby at 4 1/2 months. The same exact thing happened to my cousin's d-i-l. We had been so excited that our new grand-babies were due around the same time. |
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
|
Originally Posted By Gamma762: Both are problematic for their own reasons.
The mandated and doctor recommended COVID-19 shot for pregnant women was effectively an abortion shot according to new documents just released by Senators Johnson and Paul. “The authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data. These figures mirror the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU-486.” More shedding anecdotes:
It wasn't just those who got vaccinated. I believe unvaccinated pregnant women who spent a lot of time around the vaccinated, suffered from shedding. My d-i-l had 4 healthy pregnancies and no problem with the 5th until all her co-workers were vaccinated. That weekend she lost the baby at 4 1/2 months. The same exact thing happened to my cousin's d-i-l. We had been so excited that our new grand-babies were due around the same time. Are they connecting miscarriages to the initial shot or to the first booster? |
I strive to be the man my dog thinks I am.
|
Originally Posted By Gamma762: Both are problematic for their own reasons.
The mandated and doctor recommended COVID-19 shot for pregnant women was effectively an abortion shot according to new documents just released by Senators Johnson and Paul. “The authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data. These figures mirror the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU-486.” More shedding anecdotes:
It wasn't just those who got vaccinated. I believe unvaccinated pregnant women who spent a lot of time around the vaccinated, suffered from shedding. My d-i-l had 4 healthy pregnancies and no problem with the 5th until all her co-workers were vaccinated. That weekend she lost the baby at 4 1/2 months. The same exact thing happened to my cousin's d-i-l. We had been so excited that our new grand-babies were due around the same time. Originally Posted By Gamma762: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Originally Posted By SteelonSteel: Originally Posted By lazyengineer: Um.. did you actually read it? Because that's not what it said. The shots were oversold. But despite the religious level fervor and mantra here, they weren't completely ineffective at the time. Cherry picking text from his notes, when the rest of the quoted article doesn't even support it, undermines and weakens the ANTI-VAX case strength and credibility. In the same manner the pro-SHOT team lost credibility by cherry-picking broad claims of exaggerated effectiveness. yet, here, any degree of claim so long as supports the mantra, is greeted with complete lack of internal vetting and credibility / consistency expectations and standards on this topic. Basically, you're being played and supporting that, as bad as the other side was. It's a religion here. Amplifed by the credible disgust at the tyranny of the force vaccinations - I'll grant and share that much, at least. Whether it is or it isn’t effective isn’t solely the point. The thug style coercion on the public was unforgivable. ....! We are in agreement. Both are problematic for their own reasons.
The mandated and doctor recommended COVID-19 shot for pregnant women was effectively an abortion shot according to new documents just released by Senators Johnson and Paul. “The authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data. These figures mirror the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU-486.” More shedding anecdotes:
It wasn't just those who got vaccinated. I believe unvaccinated pregnant women who spent a lot of time around the vaccinated, suffered from shedding. My d-i-l had 4 healthy pregnancies and no problem with the 5th until all her co-workers were vaccinated. That weekend she lost the baby at 4 1/2 months. The same exact thing happened to my cousin's d-i-l. We had been so excited that our new grand-babies were due around the same time. No. Just no. Shit like this is why this topic is so painful to watch here. The wildest claims get taken and run with, with fuck-all for actual vetting. If the COVID vaccination shot actually caused an 82% miscarraige, rate, do you really think that could be hidden? There would be a universal freakout. And now proximity to someone who had a COVID shot, is causing miscarriages? Jesus Christ, try to at least gut check and vet the wild claims like that. It's shit like this that just shreds the credibility of people who have (and had) legit questions, and just sends everyone normal rolling in the halls laughing at you. Because such a wild claim could never ever actually be hidden. To be hearing on a random gun-forum as the information desimination route for an 82% miscarraige rate for a shot over half the population took, is just wild arm-waving crazy. Just so you know, there is basically zero increased risk of miscarraige from the vaccination, within the error range of the test. Which sure as shit is a lot tighter than the numbers being thrown out here. Threads like this are just painful, because people actually just suck this shit up and believe it all. While calling the pro-side full of lies. Which there were some outright bullshit lies. But if Team A lies, Ergo My Team B never lies; doesn't actually work like that. People got played so bad on this topic on both sides. And in both cases, bad decisions were sometimes made, based on false information. FFS, one more time - do you think there wouldn't be non-stop headlines if COVID shots increased miscarraiges to an 82% rate?? Shit, there'd be a freakout if it increased it by just 10% rate. You can't hid that. So no, the fucking shot should have never been forced, because it wasn't risk-free, nor was it super-duper effective. But at the time, the US COVID shots were the better choice for most people, at first, when first available. Somewhat. 'ish. And no, the wild claims that half the population are supposed to be dead by now from them, haven't come to fruition at all. What does it take to stop and go "wait a sec, the stuff I've been told isn't actually happening... so maybe *some* of this wild shit I'm sucking up, is bullshit?" Seriously, where is that threashold?? |
| https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-discussed-covid-mrna-vaccine-concerns-pregnant-women-text-chain-released-senate-committee |
Don't confuse where I live with where I'm from.
|
Originally Posted By lazyengineer: No. Just no. Shit like this is why this topic is so painful to watch here. The wildest claims get taken and run with, with fuck-all for actual vetting. If the COVID vaccination shot actually caused an 82% miscarraige, rate, do you really think that could be hidden? There would be a universal freakout. And now proximity to someone who had a COVID shot, is causing miscarriages? Jesus Christ, try to at least gut check and vet the wild claims like that. It's shit like this that just shreds the credibility of people who have (and had) legit questions, and just sends everyone normal rolling in the halls laughing at you. Because such a wild claim could never ever actually be hidden. To be hearing on a random gun-forum as the information desimination route for an 82% miscarraige rate for a shot over half the population took, is just wild arm-waving crazy. Just so you know, there is basically zero increased risk of miscarraige from the vaccination, within the error range of the test. Which sure as shit is a lot tighter than the numbers being thrown out here. Threads like this are just painful, because people actually just suck this shit up and believe it all. While calling the pro-side full of lies. Which there were some outright bullshit lies. But if Team A lies, Ergo My Team B never lies; doesn't actually work like that. People got played so bad on this topic on both sides. And in both cases, bad decisions were sometimes made, based on false information. FFS, one more time - do you think there wouldn't be non-stop headlines if COVID shots increased miscarraiges to an 82% rate?? Shit, there'd be a freakout if it increased it by just 10% rate. You can't hid that. So no, the fucking shot should have never been forced, because it wasn't risk-free, nor was it super-duper effective. But at the time, the US COVID shots were the better choice for most people, at first, when first available. Somewhat. 'ish. And no, the wild claims that half the population are supposed to be dead by now from them, haven't come to fruition at all. What does it take to stop and go "wait a sec, the stuff I've been told isn't actually happening... so maybe *some* of this wild shit I'm sucking up, is bullshit?" Seriously, where is that threashold?? As predicted, there is ZERO reliable data. This means that many will believe almost anything that fits their existing biases. But to answer your question, if there were a 10 or 20% (yes I know those are big numbers as well) miscarriage rate I wouldn't be shocked. We should recall how pervasive the propaganda was and how compartmentalized we all were. Now, a would a grieving would be mother want to be labeled a silence denier or conspiracy kook? So a bullshit claim of 80% is exactly what I would expect to observe being seeded to discredit the real numbers, and also make the real numbers look OK to those who suffer from innumeracy. That's how agitprop works and corporations understand that game just like governments. Not saying it is, just saying that's what one would expect. Because who knows!? Not me. Too many zeros, reputations and careers depend on the answers. But we will never get real numbers we can trust. Edited for spelling and clarity. |
|
Originally Posted By mcculver5: As predicted, there is ZERO reliable data. This means that many will believe almost anything that fits their existing biases. But to answer your question, if there were a 10 or 20% (yes I know those are big numbers as well) miscarriage rate I wouldn't be shocked. We should recall how pervasive the propaganda was and how compartmentalized we all were. Now, a would a grieving would be mother want to be labeled a silence denier or conspiracy kook? So a bullshit claim of 80% is exactly what I would expect to observe being seeded to discredit the real numbers, and also make the real numbers look OK to those who suffer from innumeracy. That's how agitprop works and corporations understand that game just like governments. Not saying it is, just saying that's what one would expect. Because who knows!? Not me. Too many zeros, reputations and careers depend on the answers. But we will never get real numbers we can trust. Edited for spelling and clarity. this is exactly the problem. the data does exist and it is out there. sadly it's buried under a million pounds of bullshit. Add in most of those trying to read it honestly don't have the background or education to understand what the data actually says, the people at the top refusing to dispute stupidity and the egos of people refusing to even entertain they may be wong (on both sides) and this is what we get. this is exactly why the next legit pandemic will kill millions more than it needs to. the medical community and gov as well as the media have lost 100% credibility. |
|
Originally Posted By The_Beer_Slayer: this is exactly the problem. the data does exist and it is out there. sadly it's buried under a million pounds of bullshit. Add in most of those trying to read it honestly don't have the background or education to understand what the data actually says, the people at the top refusing to dispute stupidity and the egos of people refusing to even entertain they may be wong (on both sides) and this is what we get. this is exactly why the next legit pandemic will kill millions more than it needs to. the medical community and gov as well as the media have lost 100% credibility. Maybe there's reliable data. I'm not smart enough to figure out how one could get to reliable raw data. Where does data free of conflating factors exist after this bullshit? The best bet would be a whistle-blower within Phizer (or whomever) who shares suppressed internal data and projections. But if they are smart they did all of that through a subcontractor and that sub gave them an oral report of findings without a paper trail. Anyway, Phizer has 80 or 90 billion reasons to disclose nothing and immunity from suit and prosecution. Sweet deal. Even with the political will, I'm not sure we could get there. Next pandemic? People say that, and I suppose it may be that such a thing will happen. I'm sure there will be other outbreaks. But if, legitimately 10-20% of people were dying from a new hot virus, people would take it seriously. Part of the reason people didn't take CV19 seriously is that the claimed risk did not fit with their experiences. Sure, people got sick, and some older,imunocompromised, and/or deconditioned people died. But..man, it just wasn't as bad as they said or projected. Even today, it's impossible to know the numbers who died with Cv19 vs those who died of Cv19 because of the financial incentives and fucked up record keeping. So as to your final point I would again say: maybe. I too enjoy Tom Clancy novels. (Am I the only one that noticed the similarities between this Unpleasantness and Rainbow Six? Fucking creepy) But who can we trust when they've told us to ignore our lying eyes and stop thinking for ourselves? |
|
Originally Posted By mcculver5: Maybe there's reliable data. I'm not smart enough to figure out how one could get to reliable raw data. Where does data free of conflating factors exist after this bullshit? The best bet would be a whistle-blower within Phizer (or whomever) who shares suppressed internal data and projections. But if they are smart they did all of that through a subcontractor and that sub gave them an oral report of findings without a paper trail. Anyway, Phizer has 80 or 90 billion reasons to disclose nothing and immunity from suit and prosecution. Sweet deal. Even with the political will, I'm not sure we could get there. Next pandemic? People say that, and I suppose it may be that such a thing will happen. I'm sure there will be other outbreaks. But if, legitimately 10-20% of people were dying from a new hot virus, people would take it seriously. Part of the reason people didn't take CV19 seriously is that the claimed risk did not fit with their experiences. Sure, people got sick, and some older,imunocompromised, and/or deconditioned people died. But..man, it just wasn't as bad as they said or projected. Even today, it's impossible to know the numbers who died with Cv19 vs those who died of Cv19 because of the financial incentives and fucked up record keeping. So as to your final point I would again say: maybe. I too enjoy Tom Clancy novels. (Am I the only one that noticed the similarities between this Unpleasantness and Rainbow Six? Fucking creepy) But who can we trust when they've told us to ignore our lying eyes and stop thinking for ourselves? having first hand carried more than my fair share of dead bodies from covid out of houses we will just have to disagree on that point. it wasn't bad in some areas. in others it actually was. some of that was due to the disease, some of it was due to assinine policies that help the disease kill them. |
|
Originally Posted By Bounce19712: refocus the hate on ChyyyyNaa. fuck them. Why? To some degree it's our (USA) fault. The US gov (Fauci) and contractors (Danzak, Ecohealth alliance, et al) designed and funded the creation of covid. It ended up in a Chinese lab because the work was banned in the US. What happened after that is not entirely known. Either it leaked from the Chinese lab or was released. It seems pretty certain that other strains were then released. There is evidence of strains being released in other parts of the world also. The mrna shots were a product of US research, paid for by US taxpayers and foisted on the world by the US. Remdesivir was entirely Fauci's baby. |
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
|
Originally Posted By mcculver5: Next pandemic? People say that, and I suppose it may be that such a thing will happen. I'm sure there will be other outbreaks. But if, legitimately 10-20% of people were dying from a new hot virus, people would take it seriously. Part of the reason people didn't take CV19 seriously is that the claimed risk did not fit with their experiences. Sure, people got sick, and some older,imunocompromised, and/or deconditioned people died. But..man, it just wasn't as bad as they said or projected. Even today, it's impossible to know the numbers who died with Cv19 vs those who died of Cv19 because of the financial incentives and fucked up record keeping. So as to your final point I would again say: maybe. I too enjoy Tom Clancy novels. (Am I the only one that noticed the similarities between this Unpleasantness and Rainbow Six? Fucking creepy) But who can we trust when they've told us to ignore our lying eyes and stop thinking for ourselves? I've mentioned before my thoughts that a lot of the covid response was just the government agencies running on autopilot from biowarfare/pandemic disaster plans rather than looking at the actual illness that was before them. The immediate overblown response made me think "they know it's a chinese bioweapon they just don't know how bad". And who can forget the chinese propaganda videos of bodies lying in the streets. I'm not saying that the illness was nothing, the early strains were, or could be, pretty bad. There was tremendous variation in individual responses. What rapidly became apparent is that what it actually was, was of almost no importance to anyone in authority - was was important was what it could be made to be, and be used for. Pretty much collapsed trust in government, science and medicine. Now you have really minimal things like splitting up a combination vaccine into individual shots and the medical establishment is going hyperbolic. If there is another pandemic I don't know what is going to happen. We actually had a pandemic a couple winters ago. A new RSV strain that was pretty nasty. We think it was an RSV strain anyway, never did get a real answer. A lot of people got sick, a lot of people got really sick, there were deaths. Nothing on the news. Nothing from the CDC. No new vaccines. Radio silence from the establishment. |
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
|
Originally Posted By The_Beer_Slayer: having first hand carried more than my fair share of dead bodies from covid out of houses we will just have to disagree on that point. it wasn't bad in some areas. in others it actually was. some of that was due to the disease, some of it was due to assinine policies that help the disease kill them. One of the great benefits of lacing on wingtips and not duty boots is that once the initial walk-through was done and the body was rolled into the bag, no-one asked me to help load. |
|
My father and I agree on 99% of things, but the Covid shot was not one of them. Hes in his 70's and I remember me mentioning that it bothered me that they were getting it. He asked me why. I said because of all the side effects and problems. He bit my head off in a defense of it. That conversation was cut very short simply becasue it wasn't worth the fight I would have created. They got their shots and I think 1-2 "boosters". My aunt also got it along with most of the older family. Now my aunt has permanant damage from it and she does not hold back telling anyone about it. To this day my dad will not talk about it with me. It's like a topic we just don't talk about. Luckily he's still healthy but he sees what my aunt is going through with her heart problems and I know he remembers that conversation we had. Wish they listened to me. |
|
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
Joined:
Aug 2023
Posts:
10061
EE: 0% (0)
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gamma762:
I think thats giving a bit much credit . Saying; its safe and effective It stays in the arm You won't get covid You won't spread covid Making the shot based off the most pathogenic piece of the virus Natural immunity now doesnt work Encouraging pregnant and breast feeding mothers to get the shot Encouraging parents to give the shot to their children down to 6mo old Encouraging booster after booster Demonizing any other medicinal therapy Locking people in doors Forced masking . Thats not theories and speculation, thats lies and manipulation 180° out phase with what needed to happen/be done. The people with theories and speculation are the ones who wanted to sugar coat this fucking venom. |
I think I used the term "prion-like" in 2020, maybe 2021...
BREAKING STUDY: Spike Protein Drives Prion-Like Protein Misfolding, Amyloid Formation, and Multi-Organ Damage COVID “vaccine” spike protein and lab-made SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are prion-like drivers of proteostatic collapse, pathological cross-seeding, transcriptional instability, and tissue dysfunction. mRNA vaccination has disrupted the normal homeostatic and thermodynamic balance of protein metabolism and catabolism with a range of pathogenic effects in the human body. mRNA vaccination has been a biological catastrophe thus far, and we may have seen just the tip of the iceberg. |
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
Joined:
Aug 2023
Posts:
10078
EE: 0% (0)
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gamma762: I think I used the term "prion-like" in 2020, maybe 2021...
BREAKING STUDY: Spike Protein Drives Prion-Like Protein Misfolding, Amyloid Formation, and Multi-Organ Damage COVID “vaccine” spike protein and lab-made SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are prion-like drivers of proteostatic collapse, pathological cross-seeding, transcriptional instability, and tissue dysfunction. mRNA vaccination has disrupted the normal homeostatic and thermodynamic balance of protein metabolism and catabolism with a range of pathogenic effects in the human body. mRNA vaccination has been a biological catastrophe thus far, and we may have seen just the tip of the iceberg. You can read the full study done at Swedish Linkoping University in may 2022. The study covers everything disclosed in this recent Tweet . 2022 . All the tests performed and all the results . * I believe I heard another Dr describe it in Oct 21 at a round table . He described it as "spider webbing" when acted on by neutrophils with neutrophil elastase. And from the study above it did indeed observe "fibril elongation with branching" . |
|
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
| I was one of those folks that looked at the actual data and quickly came to the conclusion that literally no one should get the shots. The data showed they were BS. There were a few rabid pro shot folks on here and it was a lot of work to counter the propaganda they were peddling. |