Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 5
Next Page
9/4/2026 7:33:50 PM EDT
How come they nearly always start with millions dying? If communism and socialism are so great how come they have to be lied about to come to fruition, how come they have to be enforced through violence and often with millions dying?
Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. F. Douglass
9/4/2026 7:35:37 PM EDT
[#1]
Because of the nature of man.
9/4/2026 7:36:39 PM EDT
[#2]
FPNI
9/4/2026 7:39:40 PM EDT
[#3]
Uh, because it was created by beggars and hangers on?
"Such predicaments! I must forge ahead!"
9/4/2026 7:41:29 PM EDT
[Last Edit: bigfatOTMs][Edited] [#4]
Everyone always talks about human nature or power and corruption, but all socialist countries will always fail even if run by perfect human beings. Why?

1. Centrally planned economies can't determine what things should cost. It's literally impossible. For example, without markets, negotiations, choice in consumer goods, competition, etc., how much do you pay a farmer? You can try to calculate a cost through studies and years of bureaucracy, but it will always be a guess that is too high or too low and shortages/overages will constantly occur. Meanwhile, in free market economies, determining how much things cost happens via supply/demand completely organically, quickly, and none of us even realize it's happening. Free markets are simply more accurate and way more efficient at this unique thing that is impossible for socialist economies.

2. The only way to ensure no one owns private property (the foundational idea of all socialist philosophies) is to have an all-powerful government that represses anyone who tries. It's the only way to make it "work". Purges, secret police, etc. are all inherent features of socialism, not unfortunate byproducts of power and human nature.
9/4/2026 7:44:43 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote


First post.

Now the argument we'll that we create AGI, then the AGI will be able to benevolently rule us, basically under communism with a UBI.  
Gator's ******* better be using jimmies!
When I hold an AK in my hands, I get feelz I don't understand
9/4/2026 7:45:26 PM EDT
[#6]
Both political systems require strong authoritarianism to implement and eventually people reject centralized power when that power is turned against them. The authoritarian never actually cedes power.
9/4/2026 7:46:55 PM EDT
[#7]
9/4/2026 7:47:43 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote


Close. Because they always run out of someone else's money.
I know I'll never go home.
So set fire to your ships, and past regrets, and be free.
9/4/2026 7:48:15 PM EDT
[#9]
If it’s so great, why does it take a bloody revolution to start it?
9/4/2026 7:48:18 PM EDT
[#10]
There is no incentive for success.
9/4/2026 7:48:33 PM EDT
[#11]
Who is John Galt?
9/4/2026 7:48:36 PM EDT
[#12]
Its not a real working economic system. Its only succeeds at creating an emergency that compels the authority to sieze greater power, to solve the emergency.

At least half the country thought martial law was the answer to covid.
9/4/2026 7:50:32 PM EDT
[#13]
It just hasn't been done right. We will see it here in a short while.
“America is a whorehouse where the revolutionary ideals of your forefathers are corrupted and sold in alleys by vendors of capitalism.”
9/4/2026 7:52:51 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Originally Posted By LnWlf:
If it’s so great, why does it take a bloody revolution to start it?
View Quote



And to get out.
I strive to be the man my dog thinks I am.
9/4/2026 7:53:22 PM EDT
[#15]
Trash ideology for trash people
9/4/2026 7:53:41 PM EDT
[#16]
The nature of man is feudalism, the smart and strong lead the weak and followers.
the better leaders replace the lesser leaders.
9/4/2026 8:00:05 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote



And this why man should be kept on earth and not be allowed to spread beyond.
9/4/2026 8:01:17 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote


Human nature. We like to own shit. Particularly shit we make.
Now she's making $15 an hour as a 'tard wrangler with a degree in women's studies... - tommytrauma
9/4/2026 8:03:38 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Originally Posted By bigfatOTMs:
Everyone always talks about human nature or power and corruption, but all socialist countries will always fail even if run by perfect human beings. Why?

1. Centrally planned economies can't determine what things should cost. It's literally impossible. For example, without markets, negotiations, choice in consumer goods, competition, etc., how much do you pay a farmer? You can try to calculate a cost through studies and years of bureaucracy, but it will always be a guess that is too high or too low and shortages/overages will constantly occur. Meanwhile, in free market economies, determining how much things cost happens via supply/demand completely organically, quickly, and none of us even realize it's happening. Free markets are simply more accurate and way more efficient at this unique thing that is impossible for socialist economies.

2. The only way to ensure no one owns private property (the foundational idea of all socialist philosophies) is to have an all-powerful government that represses anyone who tries. It's the only way to make it "work". Purges, secret police, etc. are all inherent features of socialism, not unfortunate byproducts of power and human nature.
View Quote


Yup.  Hayek won a Noble prize in economics with point 1 being a significant part of his work. Socialism can’t calculate, can’t adapt, can’t incentivize, and can’t go broke gently via profit / loss accounting and resource re-allocation through market liquidation.
9/4/2026 8:04:40 PM EDT
[#20]
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."

- W. Churchill, October 1945

If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
9/4/2026 8:04:59 PM EDT
[#21]
If the government is going to seize from the workers and give to the workless, why be a worker?
Imagine how smart we could be if there were no such thing as warning labels.

NRA Patron Life
SAF Life
JPFO Life
9/4/2026 8:05:29 PM EDT
[#22]
For the simple analogy, if everyone had a home, a car, a job, and their needs taken care of, some MFer somewhere will have something they don't and everyone is going to want one too.
9/4/2026 8:05:59 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote



Always will fail due to man.
All these Moments will be Lost in Time. Like Tears and Rain. Time...to...Die.........
9/4/2026 8:06:09 PM EDT
[#24]
Originally Posted By AlvinYork:
How come they nearly always start with millions dying? If communism and socialism are so great how come they have to be lied about to come to fruition, how come they have to be enforced through violence and often with millions dying?
View Quote


Because eventually they run out of other people's money
9/4/2026 8:06:14 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Originally Posted By DieselEngineer:
If the government is going to seize from the workers and give to the workless, why be a worker?
View Quote

This is where we already are....
9/4/2026 8:06:53 PM EDT
[#26]
Originally Posted By AlvinYork:
How come they nearly always start with millions dying? If communism and socialism are so great how come they have to be lied about to come to fruition, how come they have to be enforced through violence and often with millions dying?
View Quote


Evil fails ultimately and always. Lots of pain along the way tho.
9/4/2026 8:07:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: uncle_big_green][Edited] [#27]
It's evil. That's why.

ETA - beat by the correct post above.
"Positive rights" are neither.

Busy leaving people the F alone.
9/4/2026 8:08:50 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote


Exactly what I was about to post.

That is the cause.  There are no subtleties, details, or complexities.

Keep your powder dry, and watch your back trail.
9/4/2026 8:10:33 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote


Because it’s against the nature of man. Man tries to improve his lot. Acquire things. Marxism is there to take from those who like to acquire things. After awhile nobody wants to acquire things for those that are to lazy to do it themselves. Then draconian measures have to be put in place.

It’s also the Antichrist. As it makes man God or the highest beast. Based entirely on a gospel of envy. Someone has more and therefore they are evil. Unless you’re the party boss of course.
9/4/2026 8:11:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: macro][Edited] [#30]
Its a poorly thought out, lazy solution.  In practice it can't work because it relies on adherence. Humans aren't evolved to the point where we adhere to things that conflict with our innate fight or flight reaction to stimuli.

Most people have an intrinsic bias toward justice. There is no justice in communism. Quite the opposite. It requires the suspension of justice in order for it to work.  

It reminds me of the psychology require to make a cult function.
9/4/2026 8:15:08 PM EDT
[#31]
The fundamental reason why Socialism/Communism always fails is that it no answer for one simple question:

"How much should everything cost?"

Everything reason given in this thread is rooted in that fundamental defect.  Economies run on the concept of scarcity and Socialism / Communism has no answer for how you price scarcity.  

9/4/2026 8:18:21 PM EDT
[#32]
The poors get convinced that they will get a seat at the decision making table, and they dont.
9/4/2026 8:21:38 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GlutealCleft][Edited] [#33]
Because it puts the foxes in charge of the henhouse, even more fully than capitalism.

Socialism/Communism, by nature, demand that the government have even *more* authority and control over people, their lives, their property, and their decisions.  Which lets government stooges get away with even more selfishness and evil than they can get away with under capitalism.
9/4/2026 8:22:31 PM EDT
[#34]
Because an economic system based on theft is fundamentally unsound.
9/4/2026 8:24:25 PM EDT
[#35]
Because they kill the very people they vowed to help.
9/4/2026 8:25:46 PM EDT
[#36]
Because it is a spiritually empty, materialist, and deterministic belief system that embraces to the sin of envy.
9/4/2026 8:26:46 PM EDT
[#37]
Greed, power, control and retardation
9/4/2026 8:26:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: fatalerror113][Edited] [#38]
1) Because it does not solve the problem of concentration of wealth and power. It just redistributes that to the party insiders.
2) It incentivizes every person to take as much from the system and put as little in it as possible.
3) centralized planning of everything is impossible in practice.

9/4/2026 8:27:05 PM EDT
[#39]
Shows the degree of human insanity when the idealistic, stupid and desparate ban together
to try socialism, which has failed so many times, and yet they expect a different outcome.
9/4/2026 8:28:05 PM EDT
[#40]
Did you read Animal Farm in school?
9/4/2026 8:28:13 PM EDT
[#41]
Socialism is incompatible with human nature.

In "Of Plymouth Plantation", the pilgrims tried socialism.  They had a communal garden system where everyone was supposed to put in equal work in return for the food being divided equally.  Guess what?  A few people put in most of the work, some people did some work, and a few free loaders did almost nothing and still expected an equal share of the food.  

They decided that each family would work its own plot and get whatever they could produce.

A society can strive for one of two systems, in general.

One approach is to strive for equal opportunity with the understanding that it will produce unequal results.

The other approach strives for equal results with the understanding that it will require unequal opportunity.

Only one approach is compatible with human nature.  



It's as if a big chunk of our adult population has lost the ability to tell the difference between what is possible, and what is probable.
9/4/2026 8:28:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TresOsos:
Because of the nature of man.
View Quote
100%

but, I'll expand just a bit. there is no incentive to do better. In fact, there is an incentive to do less, because if you do less than your neighbor, but receive the same handouts, you actually "earned" more than they they did per unit of labor.
Always blame autocorrect.
9/4/2026 8:29:34 PM EDT
[#43]
Another organic thought....its laughable when the people who own nothing start making decisions about how the people who own a lot ought to do things.  

I earned what I have.
No.  
You can't have any.


9/4/2026 8:31:03 PM EDT
[#44]
No Freedoms.
9/4/2026 8:41:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RhinelandArms][Edited] [#45]
Quote History
Originally Posted By LnWlf:
If it’s so great, why does it take a bloody revolution to start it?
View Quote


Followed by killing millions more and then building a fence to keep the ones you cant kill inline.

And most democrates think they want this now... no matter their income level.
9/4/2026 8:41:22 PM EDT
[#46]
Originally Posted By AlvinYork:
How come they nearly always start with millions dying? If communism and socialism are so great how come they have to be lied about to come to fruition, how come they have to be enforced through violence and often with millions dying?
View Quote

Socialism is fiction.   It doesn't exist.   Utopian fantasy.   Empty speeches and brutal authoritarianism.   The authoritarianism is real but the utopia cannot exist.
9/4/2026 8:42:53 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote History
Originally Posted By PortaJohnPicasso:


Because eventually they run out of other people's money
View Quote


Yep. Margaret Thatcher said it.
You can joust at windmills with that old Fender guitar. Probably do about the same.
9/4/2026 8:44:16 PM EDT
[#48]
According to those that preach for it, it just hasn't been applied correctly. They'll get it right this time though.
9/4/2026 8:46:31 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote History
Originally Posted By macro:
Another organic thought....its laughable when the people who own nothing start making decisions about how the people who own a lot ought to do things.  

I earned what I have.
No.  
You can't have any.


View Quote

You mean renters?
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
9/4/2026 8:50:58 PM EDT
[#50]
Look at America post 1965 or so.  Is it REALLY failing?

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 5
Next Page