Posted: 10/24/2025 1:46:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: brass][Edited]
If you've had problems with it, this is a pretty cool graphical video that's super easy to understand. Spans everything from the Æther to time itself and how space and time are linked as spacetime. I finally understood why time even exists! (My mind is blown) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcOLyqfA5k8 (His shirt says "Don't be a jerk", a jerk (d³x/dt³) is the rate of change of acceleration (d²x/dt²) which is the rate of change in speed (dx/dt). x is location and t is time. There's the physics lesson(s) for today.) |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
I wonder how this relates to entangled particles? I heard it explained once that entanglement is similar to looking at a fish through different angles of the fish tank. Because of the optical illusion of the glass and angles, we see two fish moving exactly the same way, but its the same fish. Like in the video, the shuttle inside a moving frame casting two shadows, the 2d observer extrapolates the two shadows are from a single object moving proportionally.......maybe theres only one particle we're seeing. Not two that are entagled? It all makes my brain hurt |
|
Originally Posted By WorkDroid: I wonder how this relates to entangled particles? I heard it explained once that entanglement is similar to looking at a fish through different angles of the fish tank. Because of the optical illusion of the glass and angles, we see two fish moving exactly the same way, but its the same fish. Like in the video, the shuttle inside a moving frame casting two shadows, the 2d observer extrapolates the two shadows are from a single object moving proportionally.......maybe theres only one particle we're seeing. Not two that are entagled? It all makes my brain hurt That's a decent analogy to explain what things seem like, but experimentally, there really are two separate particles, the most solid being the Chinese satellite proving a (very very) slow data rate, or at least ability to tell if last message was read, then it could send another transition, a whole new sort of Manchester coding would be needed to use entangled photons as a communication medium, I'm 99.95% That Lockmart et al already have pretty good bandwidth with them for things like controlling UAVs on the other side of the globe for a 'fast twitch' data channel and satellites for bulk data with flight and warnings taking the entangled route or similar. However can't prove that or find out from the .gov, since lockmart is a private company. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
This isn't mainstream relativity of 2025, so keep that foremost in mind. 'ENTANGLEMENT ' , of which I can duplicate mathematically and I will never prove is my Opinion. Entanglement in our reality is multi-banded: • Causal – hydrogen bonds all matter. • Quantum – hydrogen’s proton and electron tunnelling sustain coherence. • Biological – light within living systems may mirror that coherence. 'It's under research and promising'. How does it work? Hydrogen is the cosmos’ common denominator (D ≈ 1.618). All mass is connected through hydrogen. The simplest most abundant element, bridging energy and matter in every known form. D= 1.618 and Its logarithmic scaling appears from quark to the stars. Most dismiss D = 1.618 as a 'magic/golden' mystery woo woo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio Except my model locks all the 'golden' angles, ratio, music even thought, to form a mathematical symmetry to 'most' of the common sense our elders have been saying for years. So yes, 'to me' entanglement is not only possible but is part of our normal existence. And full disclosure. I am 6 years past expected expiration date (from Brain Disease). Not the best source of information, and I don't claim I know anything that can't be resolved via math. Math doesn't allow my mistakes to hide. So grain of salt, mad cow, 'plumb crazy' or demented opinion from old fart and all that.......  This is a link to a visual representation of how this 'can be' possible. https://zenodo.org/records/17493675 People have been telling and sensing this for years. It's so simple yet so defensible. If you go googling, (LCDM) 'missing 28% of dark matter' is mainstream theory, and doesn't yet claim this. So although my opinion, the 'math' / physics of 2025 is also easily maintained in 'my version'. It doesn't 'break physics' conservation laws. Zero 'woo-woo' or happenings. The only magic is physics yet discovered. The Magick of Physics, by Felix Flicker is a must read. Again, this is not mainstream theory of 2025. It's a mathematical model that connects all the dots. Still, I haven't found any better answers in my research. And if 1 or 100 years from now my mathematical model is broken, at least I was thorough lol. This is why I post in this forum. Many out of the box thinkers, and some very smart critics. This forum is the treasure of GD.  'If you were betting a beer', go with Brass's examples. At least some theories have physical data they can and do provide. Works 'mostly' with my theory as well and as new data comes in it all aligns. If you're contemplating, there are many theories/examples. Many examples are separated by words which are subjective. Math is the only pure language we have. |
https://zenodo.org/records/17497241
FUNt - Final United Nature theory of, EVERYTHING
FUNt - Final United Nature theory of, EVERYTHING