Beretta 92FS $495 after rebate (Page 4 of 4)
|
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad: Thanks for the “gouge”. I had never heard that about the Beretta recoil spring being compared to the barrel length. Was that a legit rule of thumb practice back in the 1980’s? My first Beretta pistol was a 96 Brig Inox (in .40S&W) . I was shooting it in the local steel challenge type matches with factory WWB ammo. That would have been about in 2007. It would eject that .40 brass with gusto. So much so that the squad of shooters behind me in the “peanut gallery” would always make comments, as they got hit with the brass. This was a stage we called “Texas Tree”: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/369122/IMG_8844_jpeg-3830696.JPG You can just barely make out the big screen timer display on the tripod on the right. Talk about a grip it and rip it stage. ![]() At some point I bought another 96 Brig Inox. That was supposed to be my backup gun when I traveled to major USPSA and IDPA matches. But I never had to use it. Then I bought a 92 Brig Inox. And then another. Completely making the shift to shooting just strictly 9mm for competitions. I was all 92, then 96. Load up some .40 minor for your 96s. For the same power factor you feel like you went from a Gen 3 4 runner to a GX460. |
|
Originally Posted By CAsoldier: I said that when it was coming out. It was a PIP too so much cheaper. But noooooo……. I agree. In the 80swhen we traded in our 1911A1s for M9s I was pissed we didn’t go to a double stack .45 frame instead. I was already retired when the M17/18s were adopted. It would have made more sense to go the the next gen M9, plus make G19s a unit specific of final service weapon. |
