|
Quoted:
Payoff pass. Quoted:
|
|
Quoted:
and now they recess... wow... Mitchell is dragging her feet and not really getting much done. That was a horrible call having her question her. So much fail on the (R) side of the bench. Give all the Dems 5min after her opening statement, then all Rd cede to Rachel. Give Rachel 45min. She'd have been toast |
|
Quoted:
Would somebody supposedly crying etc give accurate polygraph results? Not that I believe anything she says is truthful anyway...... And it wasn't a legit test anyway. |
|
Quoted:
Wtf? |
|
Quoted:
2 questions cannot be enough to establish any sort of scientific baseline. Quoted:
Quoted:
Had to fit in the 2 question poly between tossing granny in the ground and jetting off. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Put that on the Turbo-Encabulator guy please.....  
|
|
Quoted:
If you were upset and crying during a polygraph, you would fail But, she passed. So, either she is lying, or the polygraph people are. |
|
Quoted:
What we are watching is an attorney demonstrate that this woman has credibility issues..a lot of them. She's being destroyed and doesn't even know it. She's nuts. I don't like saying it, but, Ford and the (D) are not making many mistakes. Mitchell is not getting in much at all and wasting the clock. She only has 55min to get it done and now things are making Ford look much more believable. BK had better be solid, to the point, and have some serious statements of facts to refute the accusations. Mitchell needs to land on a date/location and really zero in on this to get any credibility issues across. Twitchy follow up is brutal... even Chris Wallace is making the case for Ford |
|
Quoted: I think the prosecutors only job is to establish as many inconsistencies as possible in the story. There will be no “gotcha” in public but rather this will be used to get wobbly votes to “yes”. |
|
Quoted:
The polygraph was on the day of her Grandmothers funeral. Or it might have been the next day. Maybe she should ask her beach friends This is all stuff from the last month or two... |
|
Quoted:
What are we looking at here? Quoted:
 .
|
|
Quoted:
Who's the human tree trunk that's following her around? |
|
Quoted:
2 questions cannot be enough to establish any sort of scientific baseline. Quoted:
Quoted:
Had to fit in the 2 question poly between tossing granny in the ground and jetting off. the questions could have been, is water wet, and is the sky blue, but since the underlying basis of the polygraph was not provided to grassley, all they have is the report that says she told the truth |
|
| can any lawyer-expert types give us a score thus far? My non-legal mind says she is doing fine as she has not flipped out or said anything really dumb. Please tell me that those "in the know" are happy with the results? Or, is it the way it looks to me, as long as she does not say something super dumb, this will be considered a win for the D's and that she is full of truth, strong woman, etc, etc. |