Armory Sponsor
Posted: 12/30/2017 9:09:26 PM EDT
|
Finally got a chance to get out and play with my TX-12 underbarrel mounted AOW
https://youtu.be/48MbgY9Ec98 |
![]() Under barrel 12ga; TX-12 AOW; Masterkey; YHM Turbo suppressor |
|
Where did you buy?
Can I ask what you paid? It looks sweet Is that a standard 10.5" upper? |
I wouldn't stand in front of a piss-filled supersoaker. Does that make it a good pistol? - Caboose314
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet
|
Originally Posted By bradpierson26:
Where did you buy? Can I ask what you paid? It looks sweet Is that a standard 10.5" upper? It’s a standard 10.5” PSA upper; just added a 7075 drop in picatinny rail. |
It's ARFCOM. No matter what - somebody will bitch.
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
1266
EE: 100% (76)
|
Originally Posted By bjgunner: Bought it straight from the manufacturer Ten X Ammunition. They were clearencing out a few of them; it would be worth giving them a call to check if they still have some. It’s a standard 10.5” PSA upper; just added a 7075 drop in picatinny rail. Does the BATFE consider this a SBS once mounted to an AR w/ stock? I only ask as I'm in Washington state and can do AOW's (I already own a SERBU type) but can't do SBS. Thanks in advance. |
10OCT16 - GM Curtis Worth Hulit (USN) 4th Bat. Seabees - WWII - 30JAN09 - R.I.P. Grandpa
|
Originally Posted By bjgunner:
It’s still an AOW even when mounted to the rifle. [edit:] Looks like the manufacturer claims it's an AOW when it has its own pistol grip mounted as a standalone weapon, but a Destructive Device when mounted to a rifle. That makes sense. You might want to ask to have this thread deleted. |
˙ǝuılƃıs ʎɯ uı ʇnd oʇ ɹǝʌǝlɔ ƃuıɥʇʎuɐ ɟo ʞuıɥʇ ʇ,uɐɔ I
|
Originally Posted By bjgunner:
The ATF approved the original design for use on a rifle. They later advised them to add the pistol grip to keep the AOW status. These were never reclassified. Attached File http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=589687 |
|
Originally Posted By Daggertt:
Then this letter confuses me.... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/435611/Screen_Shot_2018-02-06_at_8-443841.JPG http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=589687 http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu212/ke6guj/NFAstuff/aowunderrifle1.jpg http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu212/ke6guj/NFAstuff/aowunderrifle2.jpg http://i649.photobucket.com/albums/uu212/ke6guj/NFAstuff/aowunderrifle3.jpg |
It's ARFCOM. No matter what - somebody will bitch.
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
1281
EE: 100% (76)
|
If I follow this thread correctly - it would not be controversial to add the non-gripped AOW version to a "pistol" since a pistol does not have a stock.
A "braced" AR would seemingly be A-OK? and where does one find the AOW non-gripped version? In my opinion - it would have been ideal if they made a version that allows an "AR" grip that could be removed if desired or picking a grip of ones choice. |
Armory Sponsor
