Armory Sponsor
Joined:
May 2025
Posts:
2
EE: 0% (0)
| Second half of the 1990's. Ban Era, so they had that hider pressed over the barrel. Second pic is interesting, first I've seen one with the fake hider removed. Fugly. |
valheru21:"The argument, "this gun won't go down in value," is used to convince the wife that you are not making a bad financial decision when purchasing a firearm. You're not ACTUALLY supposed to ever sell the gun."
Matt
Matt
|
I had an SR-15 M4 for awhile - I think I paid roughly $1200 for it, brand new with tax and dealer's special order / transfer fees. That was around 1997-1998 if I remember correctly. The lower receiver was LMT marked / serialized on the grip tang, but laser engraved Knight's Mfg. Co, etc. on the usual spots on the magazine well under ATF variance. The barrel was a Wilson made, non chrome-lined with the pressed-on flash hider. It shot fine, nothing great, but was a factory-built AR kitted with good parts (the trigger in mine was excellent) that made it a pretty good value at the time compared to buying a Bushmaster or Olympic and trying to accessorize it similarly. (I left out Colt because, at that time, anything commercially available was hard to source and relatively expensive for me - plus you had to navigate all the non-standard pins and sear block BS.) I sold it to a friend, but kinda wish I still had it. I'll add that in the images posted by OP - none of the SR-15s of the time came with a removable carry handle, and they pre-dated the KAC trigger guard installed on that Match rifle by over a decade. Hope this helps! |
|
Originally Posted By havoc: I had an SR-15 M4 for awhile - I think I paid roughly $1200 for it, brand new with tax and dealer's special order / transfer fees. That was around 1997-1998 if I remember correctly. The lower receiver was LMT marked / serialized on the grip tang, but laser engraved Knight's Mfg. Co, etc. on the usual spots on the magazine well under ATF variance. The barrel was a Wilson made, non chrome-lined with the pressed-on flash hider. It shot fine, nothing great, but was a factory-built AR kitted with good parts (the trigger in mine was excellent) that made it a pretty good value at the time compared to buying a Bushmaster or Olympic and trying to accessorize it similarly. (I left out Colt because, at that time, anything commercially available was hard to source and relatively expensive for me - plus you had to navigate all the non-standard pins and sear block BS.) I sold it to a friend, but kinda wish I still had it. I'll add that in the images posted by OP - none of the SR-15s of the time came with a removable carry handle, and they pre-dated the KAC trigger guard installed on that Match rifle by over a decade. Hope this helps! I kick myself for not buying a KAC 18" LPR complete for $1200 around '12-'13. Only had 100 rounds through it too |
|
I bought the bottom rifle in your pictures, an SR-15 Match new in 2003 for $1500. I sent it to Gemtech, had them cut and thread the barrel to 18" and installed a bi-lock flash hider. I shot the upper and my M4-96D suppressor with a pre-ban Bushmaster lower until the ban sunset the following year. I still have that rifle. The triggerguard in that picture isn't period correct since the rifle just came with a standard triggerguard. |
|
Originally Posted By runguns: I kick myself for not buying a KAC 18" LPR complete for $1200 around '12-'13. Only had 100 rounds through it too I literally just tried kicking you through my PC back in time to 12-13 for not jumping on that as well... LOL... |
- Freedom is not Free.
- LunchBox 1 and 2 Crew
- LunchBox 1 and 2 Crew
Joined:
May 2025
Posts:
3
EE: 0% (0)
|
Attached File How was the urban accuracy? |
valheru21:"The argument, "this gun won't go down in value," is used to convince the wife that you are not making a bad financial decision when purchasing a firearm. You're not ACTUALLY supposed to ever sell the gun."
Matt
Matt
Armory Sponsor

