Armory Sponsor
Posted: 9/10/2026 1:53:07 PM EDT
| DD 10.3” 5.56 with Rugged Razor 5.56 and no adjustable gas block. The Razor doesn’t have a to. Of back pressure anyway but if I’m buying an ambi CH, I might as well get one designed to reduce blowback since the gun wears a can 100% of the time. |
“It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men”
- Samuel Adams
- Samuel Adams
|
Originally Posted By mak0: I like the Griffin SNACH v2, I'm also using it on a DD mk18. I liked it so much that I bought a second one for my LMT 10.5. Reviews on the SNACH V1 seemed universally positive but I’ve seen quite a few complaints on V2. |
“It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men”
- Samuel Adams
- Samuel Adams
|
Originally Posted By triburst1: Reviews on the SNACH V1 seemed universally positive but I’ve seen quite a few complaints on V2. Originally Posted By triburst1: Originally Posted By mak0: I like the Griffin SNACH v2, I'm also using it on a DD mk18. I liked it so much that I bought a second one for my LMT 10.5. Reviews on the SNACH V1 seemed universally positive but I’ve seen quite a few complaints on V2. What issues have people had with them? I have two of them and have had no complaints. I like them better than the Silencerco GDCH. |
|
FCD ACF I started running this on my MK18 years ago and I've since switched all of my rifles to them. Single piece design really cuts down on any gas seepage and the ergos are legit. Eta: I'm right and everyone else is wrong.  Attached File |
Thank you Iraq, for giving me this emptiness inside.
|
Originally Posted By triburst1: Reviews on the SNACH V1 seemed universally positive but I’ve seen quite a few complaints on V2. Early we had a spindle warmup issue that made a couple parts that wouldn't fit some uppers. We figured out a method of checking with Renishaw to prevent that size control problem. The newer part fits significantly better, and that's one of the ways that it works, aside from a couple intuitive design features for handling gas. It has one or placed second in every suppressor gas handling charging handle test it has been in, often with multiple tested products. I believe Geissele has been well placed. |
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
I like the Geissele government ambi. Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By bainbridge: All the "so called" gas mitigating charging handles are not really up to the tasks meaning it does very minimal to prevent the gas to the face. Cheap ambi charging handle with gasket maker mod will be the best and cheapest option. That's not really true, we went through several revisions developing the G2 SNACH and we tested it and it was producing a substantial difference in testing. It is a more substantial difference though if you're running a high pressure can than a reduced backpressure can, because there is more gradient in performance difference from standard, to make it more night and day noticeable. |
Austin, Managing Partner - www.GriffinArmament.com
|
Originally Posted By DetroitSounds: Charging handles. Most of em are fine. Really how often are you actually pulling on that bitch? As far as gas, it's so negligible between a mil-spec and Raptor, etc. At any rate, I like the Geissele airborne CH, but there a lot of good ones. They're probably not your only solution to gas, but part of it. |
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
Armory Sponsor