Armory Sponsor
Posted: 7/13/2025 8:22:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: compuvette][Edited]
"He had the right hand of the devil strapped tightly to his side."-The Last Cowboy
|
Originally Posted By Urimaginaryfrnd: What kind of accuracy are you seeing with the all weather 44 m ? With my “midrange” 240 grain magnum SWC’s I get about three inches at 100 yards. This is with the factory buckhorn sights that I’m not a huge fan of. The 300 grain TC load was under 3 inches. I haven’t grouped anything jacketed yet. Lucky Gunner grouped a Model X 44 at about 1.5 inches with jacketed bullets at 100 yards. The All Weather has a round 1/20 twist barrel and my Classic has an octagonal 1/20. The 200 grain RNFP’s were pretty much all touching at 25 yards today. |
"He had the right hand of the devil strapped tightly to his side."-The Last Cowboy
|
Originally Posted By compuvette: With my “midrange” 240 grains SWC’s I get about three inches at 100 yards. This is with the factory buckhorn sights that I’m not a huge fan of. The 300 grains TC load was under 3 inches. I haven’t grouped anything jacketed yet. Lucky Gunner grouped a Model X 44 at about 1.5 inches with jacketed bullets at 100 yards. The All Weather has a round 1/20 twist barrel and my Classic has an octagonal 1/20. The 200 grain RNFP’s were pretty much all touching at 25 yards today. Originally Posted By compuvette: Originally Posted By Urimaginaryfrnd: What kind of accuracy are you seeing with the all weather 44 m ? With my “midrange” 240 grains SWC’s I get about three inches at 100 yards. This is with the factory buckhorn sights that I’m not a huge fan of. The 300 grains TC load was under 3 inches. I haven’t grouped anything jacketed yet. Lucky Gunner grouped a Model X 44 at about 1.5 inches with jacketed bullets at 100 yards. The All Weather has a round 1/20 twist barrel and my Classic has an octagonal 1/20. The 200 grain RNFP’s were pretty much all touching at 25 yards today. iirc the heavier bullets shot (much) better but there was also a 600-700 fps difference between 180s and 300s. All I've shot out of my .44 X so far is those 180gn Remington SPs; accuracy is good enough for a travel HD rifle in AWB areas (just over 2000fps according to LG!) but I don't think I want to use it for much more than that. If it's any consolation, while I like the FO aspect the X rear sight is far worse than a regular buckhorn. This is eventually getting a rear Skinner/stock front FO sight (it really pops with a weapon light) or a 2.5x20 Leupold. |
|
Originally Posted By brachiosaur: iirc the heavier bullets shot (much) better but there was also a 600-700 fps difference between 180s and 300s. All I've shot out of my .44 X so far is those 180gn Remington SPs; accuracy is good enough for a travel HD rifle in AWB areas (just over 2000fps according to LG!) but I don't think I want to use it for much more than that. If it's any consolation, while I like the FO aspect the X rear sight is far worse than a regular buckhorn. This is eventually getting a rear Skinner/stock front FO sight (it really pops with a weapon light) or a 2.5x20 Leupold. I’ve got an X in 357 I use with a can. I’m probably going to stick a small red dot on it. I’m thinking about a Skinner for the All Weather. |
"He had the right hand of the devil strapped tightly to his side."-The Last Cowboy
This guy showed a ton of .44 numbers, both velocity and weight retention, primarily in a 16" Winchester but also shoots revolvers to an SBR (Canadian) to full length rifles. The first half is testing, the second a bear hunt.![]() Bear Hunt! 44 mag - Rifle - Ballistics |
|
Nice. I am doing similar soft loads with Acme bullets in my new 92 .44-40. My twist is 1:36 though. I first took 0.430 Acme 200 RNFP and sized them to 0.429” and had ok accuracy and one nice group around 1200 fps. I tried their factory sized 0.428 bullets and am getting 2.3-3.5” groups at fifty yards. Nothing to excite me. My next step is back with fatter bullets after I get a .44 mag expander to replace the one in my .44-40 expander die. I could carefully squeeze a 0.429 diameter bullet in the prepped case but 0.430 would not have made it without crumpling the case. Hopefully tomorrow that expander stem shows up in the mail. I really didn’t want the magnum or to magnamize the .44-40. I just want accuracy. Also not a fan of buckhorns. I am thinking about calling winchester to buy the ladder sight offered on the big loops. Old man eyes and that tiny notch in the buckhorn……suck together! The .44-40 is set up well to shoot softly, thin case necks for a good chamber seal at lower pressures that you may not get with .44 special/mag. Oh and besides the .44-40 dates back to the intro of the ‘92. |
The only hyphenated names I like are cartridge names......30-06, 30-40, 38-55 etc.
Armory Sponsor

