Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
7/26/2026 1:18:36 PM EDT
I just learned some reloaders are resizing 277 Fury cases to .308. Along with that there is mention of being able to take advantage of the hybrid case to load at higher velocity The hybrid case is listed as having 80k pressure limit. Assuming a modern bolt action this could really spice up the .308.
Has anyone here done this or know anything about it?
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
7/26/2026 1:25:16 PM EDT
[#1]
No, but interesting.
Selling agent for Algores carbon credit scam.

Shooting and Reloading, one hobby feeds the other.
7/26/2026 2:22:09 PM EDT
[#2]
American reloading has been selling loaded 308 with those cases. It's only loaded to standard pressure though. I assume they couldn't sell the brass and figured this was the best option.
BikerNut:
Normal people like motorcycles. Real people like motorcycles.

People who don't like motorcycles are just... weird.
7/26/2026 2:35:14 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ALASKANFIRE:
American reloading has been selling loaded 308 with those cases. It's only loaded to standard pressure though. I assume they couldn't sell the brass and figured this was the best option.
View Quote


I tried some that American Reloading 308 in reformed 277 Fury cases.  It ran fine and grouped well at the 25 yards where I was shooting it.  I reloaded the brass, which went well.  No complaints.  If they keep it cheap, I'll probably break down and buy a bunch of it.
7/26/2026 4:39:48 PM EDT
[#4]
American Reloading is where I ran across it. Asked Grok for info and got a few links to forums. I have read enough that I am going to try it out. Next up is determining what powder to use.
should be easy enough to get a 150gr bullet over 3000 fps.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
7/26/2026 5:09:17 PM EDT
[#5]
If the cases cannot be sized normally without pulling off the head, how will this work?
7/26/2026 5:42:43 PM EDT
[#6]
I tried some of the .277 Fury hybrid cases. I found them to be very difficult to size, the brass part. The stainless part was fine. But I read several accounts of ringing in the chamber from early experimenters, and decide to give up. Sold them for near what I paid for them.
7/26/2026 7:55:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: chevrofreak][Edited] [#7]
I have realized some to .308 using Hornady dies and it went fine.  I haven't loaded or fired them yet.
7/27/2026 1:13:28 AM EDT
[#8]
OP:
Why not just get these and be done with it?

https://shellshocktechnologies.com/shop/unloaded-cases/shell-shock-308-nas3-cartridge-cases/

You dont have to mess with resizing etc.  
Yes, probably more expensive but far far less hassle.
7/27/2026 5:46:06 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TGH456E:
OP:
Why not just get these and be done with it?

https://shellshocktechnologies.com/shop/unloaded-cases/shell-shock-308-nas3-cartridge-cases/

You dont have to mess with resizing etc.  
Yes, probably more expensive but far far less hassle.
View Quote

Thanks, I will be looking at those too.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
7/27/2026 6:28:16 AM EDT
[#10]
I have been using resized 277 cases for my 308 "Fury" loads.   Now, I only run these in higher end custom actions but am currently pushing the 178 Eldx and 180 tgks at 2804fps from a 23" barrel.   These loads shoot under 1/2 moa with sinfle digit SDs and ESs.    According to QL my pressure is about 74,000psi.   I also confirmed with the manufacturer that the action could take these loads consistantly and was told that it could handle them with no issues.  I have about 1200 rounds down range on this one so far.    There is a guy on Snipershide who wild cats all kinds of new cartridges from these cases as well.

As an aside, I tried one of my loads in a bergara hells canyon rifle and ended up having to use a deadblow hammer to open the bolt.   So, these are pretty spicey.   Also, I am using Alpha SRP brass more now since it requires less work to prep
7/27/2026 2:38:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GaryM][Edited] [#11]
These would be fired in a Ruger M77 VT rifle. A Mauser 98 type receiver. I believe it should be strong enough. I've also read that some have gone as far as forming these into 6.5 Creedmoor. If I do eventually try that it would be in a Ruger American Predator rifle.
I have a firm belief modern made actions are much stronger than the old ones if for no other reason metallurgy.
The idea of having 30-06 power in an inherently more accurate .308 chambering is very interesting to me.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
8/2/2026 1:07:22 PM EDT
[#12]
I do this and while I probably don’t hit 80k I am pushing the well past normal 308 velocities
8/2/2026 2:22:35 PM EDT
[#13]
Doesn't higher pressure also increase "bolt-thrust", the force impacting the bolt and locking lugs when fired? I would think occasional firing is not a big issue, but a steady diet would probably affect the bolt.
8/2/2026 3:56:25 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Originally Posted By smoothy8500:
Doesn't higher pressure also increase "bolt-thrust", the force impacting the bolt and locking lugs when fired? I would think occasional firing is not a big issue, but a steady diet would probably affect the bolt.
View Quote

I think generally yes although people talking about the new Peak cases mentioned something about it not increasing thrust. The other thing is that most bolt actions are really stong so there is a bit of safety margin there. Need some math geeks to break it all down.
BikerNut:
Normal people like motorcycles. Real people like motorcycles.

People who don't like motorcycles are just... weird.
8/2/2026 4:54:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Trollslayer][Edited] [#15]
It sounds like the classic approach to making your rifle a barrel burner.  I could be wrong.

Is an extra 100 - 200 fps really that important to you?

277 Fury Cartridge




NAS3 Cases

8/2/2026 4:55:56 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Originally Posted By bigtex84:
I do this and while I probably don’t hit 80k I am pushing the well past normal 308 velocities
View Quote


What are you using?  Let's run it through GRT and see what pressure you're getting.
8/2/2026 4:57:58 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Trollslayer:
It sounds like the classic approach to making your rifle a barrel burner.  I could be wrong.

Is an extra 400 fps really that important to you?
View Quote


It makes me feel better having a 6.5 CM on steroids as a back up to my 300 PRC for big/dangerous game. Barrels aren't that expensive anyway as long as you have the means of swapping them out.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
8/2/2026 5:07:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Trollslayer][Edited] [#18]
I updated the post.  At 80ksi, it's only about 100 - 200 fps.

Would that make a difference against something like a grizzly bear, water buffalo,..?  That's an honest question, as I am not a hunter.  It would really SUCK to have the first round lock up the action of your rifle.
8/2/2026 7:31:48 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Trollslayer:
I updated the post.  At 80ksi, it's only about 100 - 200 fps.

Would that make a difference against something like a grizzly bear, water buffalo,..?  That's an honest question, as I am not a hunter.  It would really SUCK to have the first round lock up the action of your rifle.
View Quote

It's not like you'd take an unproven rifle up against dangerous game. Sig does the Cross in 277 Fury so it's clearly possible to do safely.
BikerNut:
Normal people like motorcycles. Real people like motorcycles.

People who don't like motorcycles are just... weird.
8/3/2026 12:55:47 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony:
If the cases cannot be sized normally without pulling off the head, how will this work?
View Quote
Thats the NAS3 cases, the Fury cases size just fine.  I've formed Fury into 6 Creedmoor, 260 Remington, 260 Remington AI, and 338 Federal.  It worked great in all of them.  I decided that I like the 6cm as a normal gun so I just use brass case in it now.  The 260/260ai is a Savage and I didn't fully trust its strength, but the 338fed is a Sig Cross, and it built for the pressure, so I intend to push it further, the performance is already very promising.  I may end up building a short, light 6cm for the Peak alloy brass with the new Proof PXT barrel, that would be a very sweet set up I think.
8/3/2026 1:36:59 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Trollslayer][Edited] [#21]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ALASKANFIRE:

It's not like you'd take an unproven rifle up against dangerous game. Sig does the Cross in 277 Fury so it's clearly possible to do safely.
View Quote




I went to Sig's web site to see what a Cross rifle was.  I saw one of those at the range.  It was bitchin' - compact even when open, foldable for carrying, accurate, fast reloads (box mag), powerful (saw it in 308).  

They don't list the 277 Fury as an available chambering but,... whatever.  The rifle is nice.  They look even better in person and after mounting a nice scope.  

8/3/2026 2:22:21 AM EDT
[Last Edit: turbobrick][Edited] [#22]
They're available in .277, or you can just buy a barrel.  The Cross has an easy to change barrel system.  

Available at Sportsmans

8/3/2026 2:18:58 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Trollslayer:




I went to Sig's web site to see what a Cross rifle was.  I saw one of those at the range.  It was bitchin' - compact even when open, foldable for carrying, accurate, fast reloads (box mag), powerful (saw it in 308).  

They don't list the 277 Fury as an available chambering but,... whatever.  The rifle is nice.  They look even better in person and after mounting a nice scope.  

https://www.sigsauer.com/media/catalog/product/cache/2f7933e2ff16f0ec074a16ab6b6195f2/c/r/cross-308-16b-right_1.jpg
View Quote

Here’s the link to the gun at Sig https://www.sigsauer.com/cross-277-fury.html
BikerNut:
Normal people like motorcycles. Real people like motorcycles.

People who don't like motorcycles are just... weird.
8/3/2026 6:03:18 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Trollslayer:


What are you using?  Let's run it through GRT and see what pressure you're getting.
View Quote

I haven’t shot these yet but they are up soon.  They will 100% exceed 80k

308
6.8 fury cases
Imr 4166
190gr smk
CCI BR2
OAL 2.280
41.5
41.7
41.9
42.1
42.3
42.5
42.7
42.9
8/3/2026 6:23:42 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Trollslayer][Edited] [#25]
Quote History
Originally Posted By bigtex84:

I haven’t shot these yet but they are up soon.  They will 100% exceed 80k

308
6.8 fury cases
Imr 4166
190gr smk
CCI BR2
OAL 2.280
41.5
41.7
41.9
42.1
42.3
42.5
42.7
42.9
View Quote


Let me clarify what I used in the calculation.  

42.9 gr of IMR 4166
190 gr SMK
2.820" OAL <-- check this one carefully, bigtex84!  

GRT says peak pressure was 63,820 psi.  In a 24" barrel, that yields 2591 fps.  This is over the max allowable for 308 W.  Also, the powder was not fully burned before exiting the 24" barrel.

Dropping down to 41.5 gr gave 57,384 psi and 2508 fps.  This gives you about 5% margin below the max allowable for 308W.


GRT would not even run the 42.9 gr/2.280" condition.  The error message said some thing about "the moon".  

At 2.400", GRT would run.  The estimated pressure peaked at 93ksi and 2734 fps from a 24" barrel.  <--  check this one carefully, bigtex84!

That run came with this warning.  





When I use IMR 4064 and the 190 SMK (my favorite long range bullet), I get 2575 fps using standard Winchester brass cases.  It's a hot load but doesn't require special cases or 90ksi to get that extra 160 fps.  Perhaps, that's something you should consider.  Or not, it's up to you.

8/3/2026 7:23:40 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Trollslayer:


Let me clarify what I used in the calculation.  

42.9 gr of IMR 4166
190 gr SMK
2.820" OAL <-- check this one carefully, bigtex84!  

GRT says peak pressure was 63,820 psi.  In a 24" barrel, that yields 2591 fps.  This is over the max allowable for 308 W.  Also, the powder was not fully burned before exiting the 24" barrel.

Dropping down to 41.5 gr gave 57,384 psi and 2508 fps.  This gives you about 5% margin below the max allowable for 308W.


GRT would not even run the 42.9 gr/2.280" condition.  The error message said some thing about "the moon".  

At 2.400", GRT would run.  The estimated pressure peaked at 93ksi and 2734 fps from a 24" barrel.  <--  check this one carefully, bigtex84!

That run came with this warning.  

https://i.postimg.cc/B6gdTKkX/Warning.jpg



When I use IMR 4064 and the 190 SMK (my favorite long range bullet), I get 2575 fps using standard Winchester brass cases.  It's a hot load but doesn't require special cases or 90ksi to get that extra 160 fps.  Perhaps, that's something you should consider.  Or not, it's up to you.

View Quote

Awesome thanks for the info I did whoopsie the oal.  Should be 2.280 max magazine length.  I’ll be shooting these out of a 16” barrel.  I went back and check what I actually loaded and I only went to 42.1 before I chickened out.  If I had to guess I’ll get about 2450-2475 fps if I’m lucky.
8/3/2026 8:12:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Trollslayer][Edited] [#27]
Quote History
Originally Posted By bigtex84:

Awesome thanks for the info I did whoopsie the oal.  Should be 2.280 max magazine length.  I’ll be shooting these out of a 16” barrel.  I went back and check what I actually loaded and I only went to 42.1 before I chickened out.  If I had to guess I’ll get about 2450-2475 fps if I’m lucky.
View Quote


2.280" may be your max magazine length, but what OAL did you use for these cartridges?  

I used 2.82" and 42.1 gr of 4166 yielding 2318 fps from your 16" barrel with peak pressure of 60.0ksi.  



I load the 190's to 2.895" OAL (0.020" off the lands).  My Remington's magazine is 2.830" max, so these are single load only.
8/3/2026 8:32:07 PM EDT
[#28]
Related: is it that you “can’t” resize the NAS3 cases, that they don’t want you to so you don’t gripe about how hard it is/how the cases come apart, or that they haven’t come up with a means to get the cases out of a sizing die, the way that they have for 9mm?

It looks like you could push their .308 cases out of a die with a 0.25 or bigger rod, which would bear on the case body part, not the head part (see their schematic of a .308 case).

Anyway, jazzing up .308 to super high pressures is probably a Bad Idea without careful selection of the rifle, the specific load, and a bunch of other factors.  The Fury was designed from the ground up as a system, including the round and the rifle.  It does not look like this is a system that lends itself to modification without plenty of lab-type support to make sure you don’t bulge a chamber, shear a bolt lug, or even catch the back of the bolt in your face.  My opinion only, YMMV, etc.
8/8/2026 2:50:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GaryM][Edited] [#29]
Got my primed cases today. A bit of one shot, actually more than a bit, and into the die.
I was able to resize directly to 6.5 CM but it left a very small crease in the neck. Not sure what to do about that. Just couldn't squish it down enough and buckled?
Sizing down to 308 was better, no problems there. Might be another week or two before I load anything up and test it out.
Unmolested 277 and resized 6.5 CM. Look close and you can see the problem.
Attached File


Attached File


The case took a bit of pressure to size but came back out very easily. No worry about pulling the case head off.


ETA, added better picture.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
8/8/2026 3:07:36 PM EDT
[#30]
I just want some +peak .308
Not fly enough to be halal....
8/8/2026 3:31:25 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote History
Originally Posted By TxRabbitBane:
I just want some +peak .308
View Quote


Factory may be some time but roll your own is ready to go.
If you think I am sexy now just wait until you find out I have full medical and dental.
Personal pronouns are; Bro/Dude
8/9/2026 4:33:05 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote History
Originally Posted By GaryM:
Got my primed cases today. A bit of one shot, actually more than a bit, and into the die.
I was able to resize directly to 6.5 CM but it left a very small crease in the neck. Not sure what to do about that. Just couldn't squish it down enough and buckled?
Sizing down to 308 was better, no problems there. Might be another week or two before I load anything up and test it out.
Unmolested 277 and resized 6.5 CM. Look close and you can see the problem.
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/26090/277_fury_jpg-3807962.JPG

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/26090/277_close_up_jpg-3807985.JPG

The case took a bit of pressure to size but came back out very easily. No worry about pulling the case head off.


ETA, added better picture.
View Quote
I use Imperial sixing wax when reforming brass.

One Shot would be my last choice for this.

Be sure to lube the inside of the case neck.
Selling agent for Algores carbon credit scam.

Shooting and Reloading, one hobby feeds the other.
8/9/2026 7:48:33 AM EDT
[#33]
Look forward to your 6.5CM experiments.
8/9/2026 9:26:14 AM EDT
[Last Edit: SyberSniper][Edited] [#34]
I have lost some faith in the GRT basic calcs...
I have noticed that no matter how precise my initial data is, if I don't have actual V0 readings and then run the post-range OBT for that charge, the (5.56) estimated psi (and fps) is way off - usually low (by as much as 10kpsi/200fps) - so now I still do the base work-up calcs but try to keep my base kpsi about at the -20% pmax line - then I take the actual oal & h2o of the fired cases to generate the OBT... surprising the difference from the base calc.  I'm finding up to 12%+ difference in some loads, probably due to poor powder models for some popular US powders
8/9/2026 10:47:57 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote History
Originally Posted By SyberSniper:
I have lost some faith in the GRT basic calcs...
SNIP
I'm finding up to 12%+ difference in some loads, probably due to poor powder models for some popular US powders
View Quote

I think you hit the nail on the head here.  GRT’s models come from crowd-sourced data, and some popular US powders have as few as ONE data submission.  More submissions from more users helps make the modeling more accurate.  LOTS more can make the models more precise.
8/23/2026 12:51:08 AM EDT
[#36]
With the big deal Federal is making over the 6.5 Creedmoor Peak, I would not be surprised to see a .308 Win (Peak) -eventually.
Have yet to  a hear of a box of 6.5 Creedmoor Peak on a shelf, anywhere; currently have it backordered with three different jobbers.

8/23/2026 12:36:18 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote History
Originally Posted By SyberSniper:
I have lost some faith in the GRT basic calcs...
I have noticed that no matter how precise my initial data is, if I don't have actual V0 readings and then run the post-range OBT for that charge, the (5.56) estimated psi (and fps) is way off - usually low (by as much as 10kpsi/200fps) - so now I still do the base work-up calcs but try to keep my base kpsi about at the -20% pmax line - then I take the actual oal & h2o of the fired cases to generate the OBT... surprising the difference from the base calc.  I'm finding up to 12%+ difference in some loads, probably due to poor powder models for some popular US powders
View Quote

GRT for common powders in common rounds running common loads within common pressure levels, is fine.  Anything outside that ,it's worse than useless, as usually wrong and giving bad estimates.

It's terrible at 6.5 Grendel.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Armory Sponsor