Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
Previous Page
/ 26
Next Page
2/21/2008 1:09:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: M4builder][Edited] [#1]

Originally Posted By unseenSNIPER:
I'm reading about having spare bolts and bolts breaking on this thread.  However I've also read that it's not a good idea to just drop in a new bolt (headspace and all).

When is it okay to drop a new bolt into a rifle with a few thousand rounds through it and the bolt breaking?  


You'll be OK using a new bolt on a used barrel. It's when someone puts in an old bolt that has worn out of spec into the pipe that things go wrong. ARs are "universally" headspaced (for lack of a better term). Many people have swapped out bolts without using gauges, and I've never heard of it being a problem.

The military is the reason for this 'urban legend', they replace parts at certain intervals, and do not want the parts swapped between weapons with different round counts.

If your worried, get a set of go/no-go gauges from Midway USA, and check when you get your spare bolts. I'll bet they are all fine, as long as the bolt is in spec, and the barrel is not out of spec to start with.

ETA/ p. nine is mine.

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
I don't aspire to mediocrity, so I'll opt for stuff made to a standard.
2/21/2008 7:05:15 PM EDT
[#2]

Originally Posted By ar_mcadams:
I would love to study all the ones that do that and see just what the problems are.  Those poor guys probably left there saying, man ARs are junk.  Should have got a mini 14.


That is funny!
2/21/2008 7:40:22 PM EDT
[#3]
tag for reference.
Bandwith consumer

كافر
2/21/2008 8:12:01 PM EDT
[#4]

Originally Posted By ar_mcadams:
I would love to study all the ones that do that and see just what the problems are.  Those poor guys probably left there saying, man ARs are junk.  Should have got a mini 14.


That would be nice. From my perspective, i am there to teach. Poorly made guns make my job harder.
Every minute i / my AI's spend unfucking someones gun is a minute taken away from teaching.

On the mil side, the guns either work or they gave exceeded their service life.
On the cop and civilian side, people buy "just as good as" and then find out it isn't.

I have more rounds through some of my guns from students then from me.
Not a good thing.

This is big boys rules. Hands can't be held, and while most coming to classes now have read multiple AAR's and buy more wisely- we aren't seeing as many problems now as we saw three years ago.

What goes wrong is pretty much standard.
Guns built to no standard.
No QC
Bad parts, springs and extractors.
Bad mags
Bad ammo
No lube.

Pretty simple actually.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/21/2008 9:50:34 PM EDT
[#5]
Thanks for sharing your expertise.
2/22/2008 9:16:17 AM EDT
[#6]
Thank you for commenting. The sharing of information is what keeps us strong and contributes to winning the fight.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/22/2008 10:27:24 AM EDT
[#7]
Pat, what's your take on STAG lowers?
Join us at The Colorado AR-15 Shooters Site: www.co-ar15.com
2/22/2008 10:36:26 AM EDT
[#8]

Originally Posted By Lancelot:
Pat, what's your take on STAG lowers?


Actually, I will take this question one further step ...

Pat the problems you see, are they mostly on the uppers or lowers?  What issues do you see with lowers in general?  I always use LMT uppers / barrels and BCGs  so I don't worry about my uppers giving me issues.
Omi R.
NRA Certified Instructor
http://www.cwlmiami.com/
2/22/2008 10:40:27 AM EDT
[#9]
And Pat, would you then recommend replacing the bolt at a round count of +/-5K and the barrel and bolt at +/- 10K rounds?

Thanks
Bill
Happiness is a warm gun,
Bang bang, shoot shoot.

The Beatles
circa 1968
2/22/2008 10:58:29 AM EDT
[#10]
Pat,
Thanks for your time and participation in this thread.  I'm finding it extremely helpful as I am attending my first carbine class with LAV this summer, and I want to make sure my ducks are in row.  I know how to run my 1911s hard, but really don't have the experience with carbines.

This thread has made me look very hard at every aspect of my carbine (unfortunately somewhat of a frankengun) to try to be prepared.  I think the last thing anyone wants is a non-functioning rifle after enrolling in a class, and your thoughts have gone a long ways toward eliminating such a scenario.
2/22/2008 11:18:25 AM EDT
[#11]
Bill, i won't recommend anything on replacement of parts for a variety of reasons.
Sorry.....
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/22/2008 11:24:39 AM EDT
[#12]

Originally Posted By BattlePack:
Pat,
Thanks for your time and participation in this thread.  I'm finding it extremely helpful as I am attending my first carbine class with LAV this summer, and I want to make sure my ducks are in row.  I know how to run my 1911s hard, but really don't have the experience with carbines.

This thread has made me look very hard at every aspect of my carbine (unfortunately somewhat of a frankengun) to try to be prepared.  I think the last thing anyone wants is a non-functioning rifle after enrolling in a class, and your thoughts have gone a long ways toward eliminating such a scenario.


Battlepack- Have a great time at class. Many frankenguns will run fine if you use good parts. At c lass last week one guy represented 99% of the gun problems- both rifle and pistol. That heldup the entire class- not a good thing....
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/22/2008 11:35:41 AM EDT
[#13]
Thanks Mr. Rogers

Been watching this thread since it started.  I have a two day Tactical Carbine Class later on in the year.  

Great information.  My AR is ready, I hope.

ZM


2/22/2008 11:54:46 AM EDT
[#14]
ZM- Roger, but if you are thinking about it, you have a good head start!
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/22/2008 1:30:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ZekeMenuar][Edited] [#15]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
ZM- Roger, but if you are thinking about it, you have a good head start!


I am registered and paid in full.  That class is only put on once a year and is limited to 10 students.

OFA is swamped every year.  I just missed out last year.  I was lucky to get in this year.  It filled up a week after I registered.

ZM


2/22/2008 9:34:54 PM EDT
[#16]

Originally Posted By BattlePack:
Pat,
Thanks for your time and participation in this thread.  I'm finding it extremely helpful as I am attending my first carbine class with LAV this summer, and I want to make sure my ducks are in row.  I know how to run my 1911s hard, but really don't have the experience with carbines.

This thread has made me look very hard at every aspect of my carbine (unfortunately somewhat of a frankengun) to try to be prepared.  I think the last thing anyone wants is a non-functioning rifle after enrolling in a class, and your thoughts have gone a long ways toward eliminating such a scenario.


I will chime in on this one as well. I ran a frankengun for years with no problems. I have a buddy who ran a frankengun (and still does) with nothing more than a broken bolt (it was waay past time to replace it anyhow). We both are avid shooters and have taken many classes, both one day and two day.

If you buy quality parts, take your time building it and do it right, use quality ammo, and for goodness sakes lube it properly you should not have problems (other than Mr. Murphy sticking his head into your business).


I had to give the frankengun back to the original owner when I purchased my SLR but I know for a fact I could take it out and shoot it all weekend right now.
If you think shooting while doing the 'pee-pee' dance is easy - you've got a lot to learn -- Drawcut
2/22/2008 9:49:35 PM EDT
[#17]
To add to the frankengun comments ...  My 7.5" SBR has been flawless through MANY courses and has yet to EVER give me one problem with over 15K rounds through it (just don't try to get it to run on wolf).  Granted, the instructors and the guys standing next to me HATE me for using a 7.5" in the class...
Omi R.
NRA Certified Instructor
http://www.cwlmiami.com/
2/23/2008 12:25:44 AM EDT
[#18]

Pat,

Now for something completely different.....

Has a student showed up with an AR that had a slickside upper?

If so, how did it do?

ZM


2/24/2008 3:43:53 AM EDT
[#19]
Do you think a Larue Quad-S is good to go for hard use? I know it doesnt have any M4 feed ramps. Have you seen any run though your class?
2/24/2008 7:27:24 AM EDT
[#20]
Zeke- you're kidding, right?
If not, please explain.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/24/2008 7:31:03 AM EDT
[#21]
Viscious- The Larue Quad S is very GTG. I have had one since the begining, and we have had a number pass through class. I'd prefer the M4 feedramps as well, but Larue only makes quality kit, and while i despise "Flawless" along with my other anti favorite, "fit and finish", it runs like a sewing machine.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/24/2008 8:36:40 PM EDT
[#22]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
Zeke- you're kidding, right?
If not, please explain.


Nope not kidding.

Has anyone showed up with an AR that had an old school upper receiver that did not have a forward assist or shell deflector?

ZM


2/24/2008 9:02:46 PM EDT
[#23]
I have been doing this going back to the early 80's, so yes, i have had M16's and early G/A/U' in my classes, and i have used these guns in service.
But truthfully, on the sliding scale of what is important to me when teaching people how to kill other people, the external appearence of the lower receiver is down there with network news, sitcoms and dancing with old stars.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/24/2008 9:26:47 PM EDT
[#24]
I wanted to know if they were as reliable as the upper with FA and shell deflectors

ZM


2/25/2008 2:45:55 PM EDT
[#25]

Originally Posted By ZekeMenuar:
I wanted to know if they were as reliable as the upper with FA and shell deflectors

ZM


I'd think that they are equally reliable, as long as they are maintained properly. It's just that when your ammo (like Wolf) causes an out-of-battery condition from a dirty chamber, you'll be sidelined longer since you'll have no way to push the BCG into battery.

You could just pull the CH also.

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
I don't aspire to mediocrity, so I'll opt for stuff made to a standard.
2/27/2008 5:27:53 AM EDT
[#26]

Originally Posted By xmikex:
Bolts and bolt carriers tend to be the primary issues I've seen.  Bring a spare.

If you've got a chrome-lined barrel, m4 feed ramps, properly staked gas key, good bolt with strong extractor (add a d-fender or "O" ring if needed) you shoud be set.

Mags are another weak point.  The latest Pmags have actually gotten good reviews (though I've never used them).  I've used USGI mags with magpul followers and been happy.


Be sure to locktight BUIS, Aimpoints, eo-techs, etc. etc.  If it's got screws and its on your gun, locktight that sucka'  
It sucks to lose a BUIS or have an eo-tech pop off during a string of fire.


LUBE: I use Grease  The key is to keep the gun lubed up.  Run it wet and you'll be happy. I like grease because it stays where it's supposed to and doesn't run off the parts that need lube like oil does.



Take care,
Mike




+1
I've just recently starting lubing my AR with WLG.  When applied correctly this stuff is amazing!  I've never had ANY of my ARs consistantly fucntion as smooth as they do with WLG.  I lubed one before Christmas and left it outside in my shed until the end of january.  I took it out and shot about 200 rounds in about 16^F weather without a single problem.

Yup I like grease!
2/27/2008 8:58:19 PM EDT
[#27]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
I have been doing this going back to the early 80's, so yes, i have had M16's and early G/A/U' in my classes, and i have used these guns in service.
But truthfully, on the sliding scale of what is important to me when teaching people how to kill other people, the external appearence of the lower receiver is down there with network news, sitcoms and dancing with old stars.


Mr. Rogers,

He was asking about the function of M16 upper receivers sans forward assist, not lower receivers sans reinforcement "fences".



2/28/2008 10:35:40 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Pat_Rogers][Edited] [#28]
Good Morning CKJ1
Mr Rogers was my Dad, my name is Pat.


I wanted to know if they were as reliable as the upper with FA and shell deflectors

Roger, and he clarified what he meant last week.
My answer remains the same.
We don't teach using the FA under any circumstances.

If the round will not chamber on its own, forcing it won't help. In fact, attempting to force a round into the chamber (generally beause the case is damaged/ bad) will only result in a worse problem.

Additionally, repeated attempts to chamber the round may be indictive of an obstructed bore, and all you are doing is forcing the obstruction further into the barrel- which will result in a catastrophic failure.
I have seen this, and i have experienced it.




S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/28/2008 11:00:07 AM EDT
[#29]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:

Mr Rogers was my Dad, my name is Pat.




Off topic, I know, but your dad wasn't this Mr. Rogers was he?





I had to, this thread is already full of 10 pages of useful information.  
Jesus is gonna talk to us about this

كافر
2/28/2008 12:16:50 PM EDT
[#30]
My Dad was Mr Rogers, but not THAT Mr Rogers....
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/28/2008 9:35:44 PM EDT
[#31]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
Good Morning CKJ1
Mr Rogers was my Dad, my name is Pat.


I wanted to know if they were as reliable as the upper with FA and shell deflectors

Roger, and he clarified what he meant last week.
My answer remains the same.
We don't teach using the FA under any circumstances.

If the round will not chamber on its own, forcing it won't help. In fact, attempting to force a round into the chamber (generally beause the case is damaged/ bad) will only result in a worse problem.

Additionally, repeated attempts to chamber the round may be indictive of an obstructed bore, and all you are doing is forcing the obstruction further into the barrel- which will result in a catastrophic failure.
I have seen this, and i have experienced it.






Thank you for the explanation.  I was curious about it too.
2/28/2008 9:52:07 PM EDT
[#32]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
If the round will not chamber on its own, forcing it won't help. In fact, attempting to force a round into the chamber (generally beause the case is damaged/ bad) will only result in a worse problem.


You know, you are the first person I've heard in a very, very long time support this idea.

Thank you.

With a pistol, a malf gets a TRB.

With a rifle, why not the same?  I do (TRB a malf).

Bottom line: if it doesn't chamber on the first try, it's coming out.

And to add to your logic, trying to push a possibly damaged round into the chamber, and then having to TRB, will slow you down more so than just TRBing from the get go; IE longer down time.

Sorry for the drift...
Yeah, it's gonna hurt like that until you pass out. Shouldn't be much longer though.
2/29/2008 8:08:13 AM EDT
[#33]
Not drifting at all, and thanks for your comments.

S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
2/29/2008 8:32:14 AM EDT
[#34]
Pat, I know what you're saying about not using the FA but I think you just opened a can of worms. I forsee a great demand for slickside uppers in the EE now.
I disagree with your position of "under any circumstances". As you know, if you are running dirty or dry, you might need a little tap to seat the round, and the problem will get worse but you can still squeeze out a few more rounds before it starts to really lock up. And I understand that for LE or private citizen there is no excuse for a dirty or dry weapon when you need to deploy it. But my experience is grunt work and I used the FA all the friggin time. I remember a couple times where I was seating the round on every shot. I just didnt have time to look away from my corner.
Like I said, I feel ya', I know what you're saying. I just think it's funny when shit like this comes up. We are gonna see threads all over the internet saying "Pat Rogers thinks the FA is worthless!" lol...
2/29/2008 1:33:20 PM EDT
[#35]

Originally Posted By southfloridaguns:
Pat, I know what you're saying about not using the FA but I think you just opened a can of worms. I forsee a great demand for slickside uppers in the EE now.
I disagree with your position of "under any circumstances". As you know, if you are running dirty or dry, you might need a little tap to seat the round, and the problem will get worse but you can still squeeze out a few more rounds before it starts to really lock up. And I understand that for LE or private citizen there is no excuse for a dirty or dry weapon when you need to deploy it. But my experience is grunt work and I used the FA all the friggin time. I remember a couple times where I was seating the round on every shot. I just didnt have time to look away from my corner.
Like I said, I feel ya', I know what you're saying. I just think it's funny when shit like this comes up. We are gonna see threads all over the internet saying "Pat Rogers thinks the FA is worthless!" lol...


If the gun is dry, it probably needs lube, if its dry and you're having to use the FA then it definitely needs lube.  It only takes a couple of seconds to drop some on the bolt on the fly.  
Jesus is gonna talk to us about this

كافر
2/29/2008 5:44:54 PM EDT
[#36]
Lubing on the fly is kinda tough when incoming = outbound.

Yeah, it's gonna hurt like that until you pass out. Shouldn't be much longer though.
2/29/2008 5:56:36 PM EDT
[#37]

Originally Posted By Backstop:
Lubing on the fly is kinda tough when incoming = outbound.



Trying to clear a jammed up cartridge if the FA isn't doing the trick isn't all that easy either.
Jesus is gonna talk to us about this

كافر
2/29/2008 5:57:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Backstop][Edited] [#38]
Can't argue with that, either.



And that's kinda why I TRB from the get go.
Yeah, it's gonna hurt like that until you pass out. Shouldn't be much longer though.
3/1/2008 10:41:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: gks452][Edited] [#39]
I just ran 560 rounds through my frankengun in just over an hour. Is it safe to assume this gun is good to go for a three day class with a minimum requirement of 1800 rounds? The gun previously had about 500-700 problem free rounds. It has an LMT BCG with an MP tested bolt.

ETA: I fired another 500 through it today. That's 1060 in two days. Only 2 minor issues. One is after 710 rounds I hit the bolt release to chamber a round and it did not chamber. I pulled the charging handle back and it worked.  The other issue is I lost one of the thumb screws that holds on the DPMS rear sight (it's a fixed position removable A2 sight.) So the comment on the first page about loctiting everything is advice I should have taken.

Bottom line: once I replace the missing nut, my gun is ready for class.  I will be taking another rifle as back up.
"You will know you are in a nuclear attack by the bright flash, loud explosion, widespread destruction, intense heat, strong winds and the rising of a mushroom cloud." - Rand Corporation Pocket Edition Survival Guide
3/1/2008 10:55:16 PM EDT
[#40]

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:

Originally Posted By southfloridaguns:
If this has been brought up, tell me to shut my trap. (I didnt read the whole thread)

I find it odd that anything would break on a rifle during a "class". I mean you fire what maybe 750-1200rds during a class. Thats crazy if something would not sustain that amount of fire. I don't think I ever saw a M4 or A4 go down during my entire enlistment. And I feel we shot alot of rounds and were pretty rough on our weapons. Our 249s' went down all the time but not the rifles. I'm confident I could grap any rifle off the rack and put thousands of rounds down range and have no problems. I just don't get it, we all know who builds the rifles the right way. We all know what the rifles are supposed to be. Why do people even consider the off brands?


Astute onservation!
Mil weapons are built to a standard, and while they will break down as they exceed their service life, they will generally function as adverised.
Aftermarket guns cut corners, possibly believing that most gun owners don't shoot much anyway and longevity is not an issue for a gun that stays in a safe.
I posted an AAR from my last class on the NC hometown and Training forums. We had two guns with problems. A brand new Armalite and a nearly new BM.

You are correct- guns that have not been shot out should not die at class.
But they do.


There is a term in the Aerospace World for this: Infant Mortality
Glocktalk, where Airsofters and Farm Animals peacefully co-habitate.


3/2/2008 8:18:37 AM EDT
[#41]

Originally Posted By gks452:
I just ran 560 rounds through my frankengun in just over an hour. Is it safe to assume this gun is good to go for a three day class with a minimum requirement of 1800 rounds? The gun previously had about 500-700 problem free rounds. It has an LMT BCG with an MP tested bolt.


Probably, but as always, 2 is 1, 1 is none.  Bring a spare bolt and plenty of magazines, or a 2nd good AR if you have one.  
Jesus is gonna talk to us about this

كافر
3/4/2008 4:39:36 PM EDT
[#42]
Anyone have experiences with Wylde or .223 chambers. Any FTEx problems with higher round counts between cleanings?

Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
I don't aspire to mediocrity, so I'll opt for stuff made to a standard.
3/5/2008 9:05:23 AM EDT
[#43]
Going through a week-long course at Blackwater, the only failures were with a Colt, actually. Bushmasters all ran fine. Problem with the Colt was not the Colt's fault, but rather the short barrel config was not setup correctly (failure to extracts/ejects). Otherwise, there were no part problems at all during the week. I still keep spare parts for classes, though.
3/6/2008 1:54:54 PM EDT
[#44]
height=8
Originally Posted By Pat_Rogers:
Good Morning CKJ1
Mr Rogers was my Dad, my name is Pat.


I wanted to know if they were as reliable as the upper with FA and shell deflectors

Roger, and he clarified what he meant last week.
My answer remains the same.
We don't teach using the FA under any circumstances.

If the round will not chamber on its own, forcing it won't help. In fact, attempting to force a round into the chamber (generally beause the case is damaged/ bad) will only result in a worse problem.

Additionally, repeated attempts to chamber the round may be indictive of an obstructed bore, and all you are doing is forcing the obstruction further into the barrel- which will result in a catastrophic failure.
I have seen this, and i have experienced it.






Hey now, I know Mr. Rogers was all about kids and his kiddy show, but did you know that he won the congressional medal of honor?  An honest to god war hero there!
3/6/2008 3:43:34 PM EDT
[#45]
Actually, you are wrong. While he was a Marine, he did not serve overseas.

This is just one of a bazillion lies, falsehhods, myths perpetrated on unsuspecting net surfers daily.

Try hitting snopes or one of the other urban legends sites for verification before posting.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
3/6/2008 4:56:32 PM EDT
[#46]
im not going to read 10 pages to see if this was mentioned.

but for those folks that use "tac" latches on their charging handles, it is a good idea to have a spare CH latch PIN and SPRING.

the longer latches put extra shearing forces on the pins, resulting in premature wear and sometimes breakage.....and if you break the pin, you will be losing the spring.

find a straight pin or needle that will fit tight inside the roll pin, hammer it in, and snip off the ends.  this increases the strength of the pin by what i would imagine to be a factor of 2 at least.
3/8/2008 12:14:36 PM EDT
[#47]
Pat,
    I notice you like Colt for obvious reasons that are well understood.  How would you rate a Les Baer or Wilson Combat or new LWRC or POF in regards to the Colt?  Have you seen many of these?  How do they do?  I would like to know because I am going to purchase a "high quality" AR.  I have shot Bushy's before but would like to get a serious one.  I am not wanting  you to tell me what to get only give some direction based on your experiences.  colt 6920? or ?????  I am not an operator and do not claim to be.  I am however like many others here that enjoy the shooting sports and like to remain proficient,  and (hopefully not ) if need be to defend my family and only the best quality is good enough for that.  thanks.
3/8/2008 8:38:36 PM EDT
[#48]

Originally Posted By 4pranch:
Pat,
    I notice you like Colt for obvious reasons that are well understood.  How would you rate a Les Baer or Wilson Combat or new LWRC or POF in regards to the Colt?  Have you seen many of these?  How do they do?  I would like to know because I am going to purchase a "high quality" AR.  I have shot Bushy's before but would like to get a serious one.  I am not wanting  you to tell me what to get only give some direction based on your experiences.  colt 6920? or ?????  I am not an operator and do not claim to be.  I am however like many others here that enjoy the shooting sports and like to remain proficient,  and (hopefully not ) if need be to defend my family and only the best quality is good enough for that.  thanks.


I have seen only a very few Wilson's and less Les baers. Those i have seen did not leave a good impression.
I have seen several POF guns, one of which went through  (i believe) eight of my classes w/o a problems. Others were not as reliable.

I am running 3 LWRC guns through a 6 month eval. We have appx 2500 rds through two, and a little over 1000 through the other, so way too early to make an educated decision, but so far so good.

I consider Noveske to be high end. I consider Colt to be the standard for service grade and LMT close behind.
Hope this helps. I am glad that regardless of MOS, vocation or job description good Americans seek to learn how to use firearms.
S/F
Pat sends
www.eagtactical.com
3/9/2008 1:22:50 PM EDT
[#49]
Pat,
    thanks for the info.  so if you had your choice among them all what would YOU get?  what would you depend your life and the lives of loved ones on, heaven fordid it came to that scenario?
3/9/2008 3:57:49 PM EDT
[#50]

Originally Posted By 4pranch:
Pat,
    thanks for the info.  so if you had your choice among them all what would YOU get?  what would you depend your life and the lives of loved ones on, heaven fordid it came to that scenario?


10 pages into it, one would think the man would have stated that if he was so inclined.  It seems like Pat is trying to avoid backing any one, or few, manufacturer(s), and has done his best to help the rest of us in doing so.  Get the hint, back off of the man, and take a course if you want the real low-down.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 26
Next Page
AR Sponsor