AR Sponsor
USGI Colt Carbine parts variation guide Edition IV (Page 2 of 3)
Wow, great stuff, will get it in the guide, but will be awhile..... |
Any clue as to why the USAF didn't receive coated stocks? Some argument about it not being necessary because they were going to largely be for perimeter defense? Or was this just because they were so early in the Colt production cycle that Colt hadn't decided to coat the stock yet? |
Air Force carbines get the same buttstocks Army carbines get, which one it is depends on date of manufacture. |
Alright, thanks, good to know. |
Not sure on the years, notice the question mark. Never seen any evidence that they were used in Vietnam. Don't know of any source of information on the 653. |
Thank You |
|
When was the 4-position collapsible stock introduced? I want to build a 723 clone (w/ C7 upper and 1/7 lightweight barrel), and I'm curious if these might have had a 4-pos stock on later models. Also, was there a point where 4-pos tubes and type-3 stocks would have used the locking nut with the 3 dimples, and not the current type of castle nut? I understand that there were always exceptions and mixed parts examples with Colt, but I'm curious if the above examples existed in any real numbers. |
It's not listed because it is not USGI. It is commercial. |
"I've yet to master my inner idiot." - jkstexas2001
"The road to hell it seems is paved with retro lowers." - WA-Tom
"The road to hell it seems is paved with retro lowers." - WA-Tom
| where can I get a set of those carbine length triangle forends and the tri caps on each end we had some of these in Nam and I like to build my retro with them. I think I say so in shotgun news but didn't see any end caps and now can't find the SN it was in. HELP |
Run with scissors!!!!
|
More info on the handguards in this thread started by RLR350.
Clickety Clickety |
Run with scissors!!!!
"Here's to gunpowder and pussy; live by one, die by the other, love the smell of both."
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger-Mike:
Any information about T-marks on the flat-top uppers? Is it true that early M4/M4A1 carbine from Colt came without T-marks? I got conflicting info on this. Thank you! True. I have one that is M4/16inch/1-in9 twist without "T" markings on the upper rail. Front of receiver has just the letter "M" stamped above the gas tube port. |
|
Originally Posted By xcibes:
I am confused now. I have a barrel that I think is from a Colt 653 and is marked C MP CHROME BORE but it is dated 1/96. I understand that some 723 barrels had these same markings buthad a 1/7 twist. Any idea how to identify my barrel? Is it one of the bubbaguns barrels? IIRC, those are replacement 653 barrels and have the later "A2" profile under the handguards. Dustin |
| Brought back old memories of the 649's and 653's, Commando's and CAR-15's we had at Nellis AFB in the late 1970's and early 1980's, my tenure there. I think we had some of the commando's, the muzzle break looks familiar. But itt has been over 30 years. |
Hi im Ogre.....official arfcom nickname
Joined:
Mar 2006
Posts:
4262
EE: 100% (15)
|
Pardon the dumb question if everyone else already knows this, but can someone tell me what the muzzle device on the XM177E2 'Commando' actually is?
Reading different places I see it called a flash hider, muzzle brake, compensator, even a suppressor. Is there anything inside it like baffles or something? I figure the reason for building the carbine was to have a short, lightweight rifle, so I'm guessing they had a reason for adding that long thing to the end of the barrel. Thanks. |
|
Thanks a lot for the pics. To my untrained eye that looks like a suppressor (never owned one myself).
So are all the extended muzzle devices on the different models similar? eta: I know how popular suppressors are these days with Spec Ops types, I didn't realize they were used back in the Vietnam era. Compared to the suppressors in use now those seem quite a bit smaller. |
USGI Colt Carbine parts variation guide Edition IV (Page 2 of 3)
AR Sponsor






























