Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
7/30/2026 4:59:52 PM EDT
Anyone able to post some size comparisons between these two optics? I'm working on a strange project rifle, and whatever optic I choose may have to be pretty far back on the rail and close to my face. I would like to see a comparison of these two optics to help me decide.
Thanks!
8/1/2026 1:49:20 AM EDT
[#1]
Originally Posted By Scrapple:
Anyone able to post some size comparisons between these two optics? I'm working on a strange project rifle, and whatever optic I choose may have to be pretty far back on the rail and close to my face. I would like to see a comparison of these two optics to help me decide.
Thanks!
View Quote


Okay I’ll bite. I used to own both and sold both. There cons to both and pros to both optics.

Let me ask first. What AMES are you looking at? They’ve got a few different models. If it’s the original AMES it’s what I owned. Great light weight optic with about the same window of view at the UH-1. It also has a great battery life due to being a red dot versus holographic. The con with it, Chinese made and I believe some warping around the sides. I can’t remember how bad or if I even noticed it. Also a lot of Holosun optics on Reddit have been having quality control issues.

The size between the two if you are looking at the original AMES, the AMES is a thinner profile, shorter, and like I said very light. I also believe they both sit at the same height. It’s not much shorter than the UH-1.

The biggest con with the UH-1 is the battery life. I also preferred it over my Eotech 512. I felt like the reticle was nicer to me.

Now I’ll throw a wrench into your project. If you want a bigger window optic like the AMES and the UH-1 and military tested. I would look at the Meprolight Tru-Vision. There are two different models. One is a standard dot and the other is a multi reticle. I own the standard dot version and like it a lot. But it’s not without cons too. It is very light weight.

Cons of that one. Standard backup sights won’t work with it. They won’t sit high enough. You’ll need to get the Meprolight brand. Not a big deal and very good quality. Con number two. The dot doesn’t use the entire window. You don’t notice it but it’s there. Think of it as a square optic with a dot used in a tube style optic like an Sig Romeo 4T Pro or an Aimpoint T2.

For the Meprolight Botach has been the cheapest as has Battle Hawk Armory. If you want the Sig optic Heart of Texas with coupon codes if ROMEO60 and ROMEO80.

My go to optic on my rifles are the Sig Romeo 4T pro and 4XT Pro.

Good luck with whatever you go with there is no wrong answer or choice.

Now a question. Why are you wanting to set it back so far on the rail?
8/1/2026 2:32:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Scrapple][Edited] [#2]
Quote History
Originally Posted By OlympicArmsFan:


Okay I’ll bite. I used to own both and sold both. There cons to both and pros to both optics.

Let me ask first. What AMES are you looking at? They’ve got a few different models. If it’s the original AMES it’s what I owned. Great light weight optic with about the same window of view at the UH-1. It also has a great battery life due to being a red dot versus holographic. The con with it, Chinese made and I believe some warping around the sides. I can’t remember how bad or if I even noticed it. Also a lot of Holosun optics on Reddit have been having quality control issues.

The size between the two if you are looking at the original AMES, the AMES is a thinner profile, shorter, and like I said very light. I also believe they both sit at the same height. It’s not much shorter than the UH-1.

The biggest con with the UH-1 is the battery life. I also preferred it over my Eotech 512. I felt like the reticle was nicer to me.

Now I’ll throw a wrench into your project. If you want a bigger window optic like the AMES and the UH-1 and military tested. I would look at the Meprolight Tru-Vision. There are two different models. One is a standard dot and the other is a multi reticle. I own the standard dot version and like it a lot. But it’s not without cons too. It is very light weight.

Cons of that one. Standard backup sights won’t work with it. They won’t sit high enough. You’ll need to get the Meprolight brand. Not a big deal and very good quality. Con number two. The dot doesn’t use the entire window. You don’t notice it but it’s there. Think of it as a square optic with a dot used in a tube style optic like an Sig Romeo 4T Pro or an Aimpoint T2.

For the Meprolight Botach has been the cheapest as has Battle Hawk Armory. If you want the Sig optic Heart of Texas with coupon codes if ROMEO60 and ROMEO80.

My go to optic on my rifles are the Sig Romeo 4T pro and 4XT Pro.

Good luck with whatever you go with there is no wrong answer or choice.

Now a question. Why are you wanting to set it back so far on the rail?
View Quote

Thanks for the info. So I'm not wanting to put it far back on the rail, but I may need to if I go with this setup:



NOT MY RIFLE, but this is what I'm aiming for

So yeah, size and shape and rail space are important, and it has to be lower 1/3 height.
I about Chinese things like the plague, where is the UH1 made? That one is sounding like a good solid contender, but I just don't know if it'll be too big and bulky in that spot.
8/1/2026 11:09:36 AM EDT
[#3]
I think an Aimpoint ACRO or COA would fit pretty good on that type of platform.   I’ve used T-2 size RDS which were useable on carbines and pistols.   Even if you needed a mounting adapter an ACRO or COA, it could offer an interesting option.
8/1/2026 12:16:29 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Originally Posted By VASCAR2:
I think an Aimpoint ACRO or COA would fit pretty good on that type of platform.   I’ve used T-2 size RDS which were useable on carbines and pistols.   Even if you needed a mounting adapter an ACRO or COA, it could offer an interesting option.
View Quote

I'm looking to get something with a bigger viewing window because it will be so close to my face, but also because the carry handle iron sights will be in front of it
8/1/2026 7:28:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: OlympicArmsFan][Edited] [#5]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Scrapple:

Thanks for the info. So I'm not wanting to put it far back on the rail, but I may need to if I go with this setup:

https://i.ibb.co/vCrdzHXd/FB-IMG-1782635274092.jpg

NOT MY RIFLE, but this is what I'm aiming for

So yeah, size and shape and rail space are important, and it has to be lower 1/3 height.
I about Chinese things like the plague, where is the UH1 made? That one is sounding like a good solid contender, but I just don't know if it'll be too big and bulky in that spot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Scrapple:
Originally Posted By OlympicArmsFan:


Okay I’ll bite. I used to own both and sold both. There cons to both and pros to both optics.

Let me ask first. What AMES are you looking at? They’ve got a few different models. If it’s the original AMES it’s what I owned. Great light weight optic with about the same window of view at the UH-1. It also has a great battery life due to being a red dot versus holographic. The con with it, Chinese made and I believe some warping around the sides. I can’t remember how bad or if I even noticed it. Also a lot of Holosun optics on Reddit have been having quality control issues.

The size between the two if you are looking at the original AMES, the AMES is a thinner profile, shorter, and like I said very light. I also believe they both sit at the same height. It’s not much shorter than the UH-1.

The biggest con with the UH-1 is the battery life. I also preferred it over my Eotech 512. I felt like the reticle was nicer to me.

Now I’ll throw a wrench into your project. If you want a bigger window optic like the AMES and the UH-1 and military tested. I would look at the Meprolight Tru-Vision. There are two different models. One is a standard dot and the other is a multi reticle. I own the standard dot version and like it a lot. But it’s not without cons too. It is very light weight.

Cons of that one. Standard backup sights won’t work with it. They won’t sit high enough. You’ll need to get the Meprolight brand. Not a big deal and very good quality. Con number two. The dot doesn’t use the entire window. You don’t notice it but it’s there. Think of it as a square optic with a dot used in a tube style optic like an Sig Romeo 4T Pro or an Aimpoint T2.

For the Meprolight Botach has been the cheapest as has Battle Hawk Armory. If you want the Sig optic Heart of Texas with coupon codes if ROMEO60 and ROMEO80.

My go to optic on my rifles are the Sig Romeo 4T pro and 4XT Pro.

Good luck with whatever you go with there is no wrong answer or choice.

Now a question. Why are you wanting to set it back so far on the rail?

Thanks for the info. So I'm not wanting to put it far back on the rail, but I may need to if I go with this setup:

https://i.ibb.co/vCrdzHXd/FB-IMG-1782635274092.jpg

NOT MY RIFLE, but this is what I'm aiming for

So yeah, size and shape and rail space are important, and it has to be lower 1/3 height.
I about Chinese things like the plague, where is the UH1 made? That one is sounding like a good solid contender, but I just don't know if it'll be too big and bulky in that spot.


I have no clue what rifle/pistol that is but I want it! Tell me more about it.

The only downside that I can see with the UH-1 on that rifle is the weight. It’s just heavier but not in a bad way. It will take some abuse.

The UH-1 is made in the USA with parts sourced from the UK is what Google says. Not sure what that means.

I’m not opposed to the AMES but there have been some quality control issues with Holosun lately. I keep seeing things on Reddit. But take that with a grain of salt too.

I can’t think of two many options for a big window other than Eotech and Meprolight Tru Vision. The Tru Vision battery life is 1-2 years. If Meprolight were to give us 5 years of battery life I would replace all my optics with one. The Tru Vision is a unique red dot. You can’t see the emitter from the front. It is in the bottom of the optic and shoots up to a mirror of sorts. Really cool optic. The body has a shroud made of polymer and is meant to take a beating and those shrouds are replaceable too.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

AR Sponsor