AR Sponsor
Posted: 5/5/2026 12:07:22 PM EDT
| I don't see why it's banned in Florida ? Now with no 200 tax fee, why can't it be added to the class three and applied for ? Does anyone else see a solution to getting it allowed in their state if it's banned ? |
| Because the FL legislature banned them. It has nothing to do with Federal NFA laws, even if the national Congress and the President signed an amended law adding them to the NFA (which would be a net negative for the rest of the country), it still would have to be un-banned in FL to be any benefit there. |
|
"Because the FL republican party State Senators and Representatives are anything but conservative and have repeatedly killed 99% of all progun bills that come up from time to time. We get what they say we get and if we don't like it, tough shit. That's how it is down here." Oh.. and you posted this in the wrong forum, IMHO. |
Now with more political fatigue.
|
Yeah, I agree that I don't think you posted this in the right forum. But there is no federal law prohibiting or "allowing" binary triggers. However I read into various articles just now before posting this and I'm reading that binary triggers are allowed. I'm assuming you are referring to 790.222 that prohibits a rate of fire increase that is normally done with a bump stock? From what I'm reading a binary trigger does not fit the definition since it is firing one shot per trigger pull. With that said it is a grey area since no court has yet to declare a binary trigger being the same violation of 790.222. So it may or may not depending on if someone gets charged and seeing if it goes through with that charge or not. |
ARFCOM’s CHO
Joined:
Aug 2022
Posts:
4844
EE: 100% (1)
FL, USA
|
Originally Posted By dalle0001: Yeah, I agree that I don't think you posted this in the right forum. But there is no federal law prohibiting or "allowing" binary triggers. However I read into various articles just now before posting this and I'm reading that binary triggers are allowed. I'm assuming you are referring to 790.222 that prohibits a rate of fire increase that is normally done with a bump stock? From what I'm reading a binary trigger does not fit the definition since it is firing one shot per trigger pull. With that said it is a grey area since no court has yet to declare a binary trigger being the same violation of 790.222. So it may or may not depending on if someone gets charged and seeing if it goes through with that charge or not. I've heard this argument as well, but I like my dog too much to test it out  ETA - also, vote for a governor who promises to end the bump stock ban. I will be 🟠 |
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
Joined:
May 2023
Posts:
2105
EE: 0% (0)
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By osprey21: "Because the FL republican party State Senators and Representatives are anything but conservative and have repeatedly killed 99% of all progun bills that come up from time to time. We get what they say we get and if we don't like it, tough shit. That's how it is down here." Oh.. and you posted this in the wrong forum, IMHO. This But you forgot that useless POS Lord Voldemort Rick Scott and resting bitch face anti-2A Pam Bonfi. |
AR Sponsor