Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Wolf M193 Bad Day (Page 2 of 2)

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
4/28/2006 3:09:32 AM EDT
[#1]
Tag
4/28/2006 5:22:05 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Wolf called two more times today, asking for pics if I could, lot numbers, where purchased, details of firearm used etc....

I obliged no biggie.

Glad they care!



I sent them the pics posted here.  Sabrina asked if I had the origional banded box the stuff was shipped in but I didn't.  Seems the lot number may be on that box as opposed to the blue ink stamped numbers on the 20 rd. cartridge boxes.

BTW, they care because this stuff is a lawsuit waiting to happen.



Im sure thats part of it but they are also commited to satisfied customers, thats why they back their ammo with a 100% guarantee
4/28/2006 7:21:12 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Not to be a smart ass, but this is why I spent the same money on 1,000 rnds of AE 55gn stuff.  I'd prefer xm193, but AE works fine for me.








FEDERALS A.E. ROCKS
it can hold its own

have you check the FEDERALS GEL TESTING on the web site?
4/28/2006 7:25:07 AM EDT
[#4]
WOW I found my 1000rds 05 or 06 headstamp   OUTSTANDING,CLEAN,MOST ACCURATE EVER?

But I will not buy anymore!

YES I SAID IT FALARAK

I will wait until the change the Charge/powder etc!
4/28/2006 7:52:55 AM EDT
[#5]
Mine was lot 46
4/28/2006 8:05:43 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Wolf called two more times today, asking for pics if I could, lot numbers, where purchased, details of firearm used etc....

I obliged no biggie.

Glad they care!



I sent them the pics posted here.  Sabrina asked if I had the origional banded box the stuff was shipped in but I didn't.  Seems the lot number may be on that box as opposed to the blue ink stamped numbers on the 20 rd. cartridge boxes.

BTW, they care because this stuff is a lawsuit waiting to happen.



Im sure thats part of it but they are also commited to satisfied customers, thats why they back their ammo with a 100% guarantee



I hope that is true.  If so, it would put them in the minority among businesses in America where "the customer is always right" has been replaced by "fuck the customer, NEXT!".  If they could just combine their great customer service with a good reliable product, we'd all be beating a path to their door.  They have some hurdles to overcome.
4/29/2006 1:01:40 PM EDT
[#7]
I think they're smart enough to realize that if they get their act together, they can make money hand over fist selling this sort of ammo to us.
4/29/2006 4:55:06 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
Sabrina asked if I had the origional banded box the stuff was shipped in but I didn't.  Seems the lot number may be on that box as opposed to the blue ink stamped numbers on the 20 rd. cartridge boxes.



Can't tell if it says PPU 0502-02 or PFU 0502-02
4/29/2006 5:00:15 PM EDT
[#9]
Tag
4/29/2006 5:52:03 PM EDT
[#10]
800 rounds fired. Zero popped primers.
Quick note: a LULA is worth every penny!
Accuracy is on par with other M193 loads.

Upper #1
Colt M16 with Bushmaster 16" superlight barrel 1/9. Colt M16 bolt carrier group.

Upper #2
Bushamster A2 with Bushmaster 20" A2 barrel 1/9. Colt M16 bolt carrier group.

Upper #1 & #2 were used on the same lower - Bushmaster A2.

Rifle #3
WASR3

NHMTG mags for the AR and Weiger mags for the WASR.

Results:
Upper #1 functioned flawlessly up until it short stroked at round #55. Cycling became increasingly erratic the more the upper was shot. Sometimes I'd drop the hammer to find an empty chamber. Mostly the upper was failing to feed from the right side of the magazine no matter which mag was used. Could be a burr on the barrel extension which has gone unnoticed while shooting other ammo. By the time I got to 200 rounds I was manually chambering every other round.

Brass from upper #1




Upper #2 functioned flawlessly up until a short stroke at round #225. Things looked unusually dry so I pulled the bolt carrier group and placed two drops of CLP through the carrier vent holes. Reassembled and fired another 175 rounds with another 2 short strokes (chamber empty - pull trigger - click) and an occasional (3) failire to return to battery. One or two raps on the forward assist and all was good to go.

Brass looked so normal I didn't snap any pictures. Recoil was VERY light for the entire 400rounds so I topped off the 20" test with 15 rounds of Federal XM193. For the first 5 rounds there was no change in recoil. For the final 10 shots there was a noticable increase in recoil - back to what I would call normal. Thinking back, I should have done the same with upper #1, but 5 hours in the sun does things with your desire to keep shooting.

WASR3 - No failures of any kind for 200 rounds. Brass was getting ejected 25 feet.
brass from the WASR



4/29/2006 6:18:47 PM EDT
[#11]
Is that brass flow on some of those rounds?

Your spent brass sure looks different than the ones in my pics.  Guess I'm just lucky (sarcasm)!
4/30/2006 6:29:48 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
Is that brass flow on some of those rounds?



Yes - but limited.  *Some* brass flow should be expected on a hot .mil pressure round like M193 spec stuff.  He also shows a little primer flow into the bolt face, but also limited.  Nothing in that brass screams dangerous.... but there are just the starting signs of high pressure.

However, givent his short stroking.... I'd say he is having the same issue as so many of us with this stuff.
4/30/2006 8:32:57 AM EDT
[#13]
QUESTION ABOUT P.P. 5.56mm  M193


P.P. has been makeing this round for years now? it seems 2004? DONT REALLY know?

They must be selling this stuff to OTHER COUNTRIES or military

I wonder if it was meant to be fired out of AK`s OR OTHERE WEAPONS BESIDES THE ar15/m16 platform?
4/30/2006 10:15:31 AM EDT
[#14]
your a brave soul shooting that much with the brass flow pressure signs.

too much for my blood...
4/30/2006 10:37:50 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Is that brass flow on some of those rounds?



Yes - but limited.  *Some* brass flow should be expected on a hot .mil pressure round like M193 spec stuff.  He also shows a little primer flow into the bolt face, but also limited.  Nothing in that brass screams dangerous.... but there are just the starting signs of high pressure.

However, givent his short stroking.... I'd say he is having the same issue as so many of us with this stuff.



Could the brass itself be too soft/inferior? I know that shouldn't explain blown primers or leakage around the primers, but maybe soft brass might give signs of overpressure prematurely.  I know that wasn't the case with my rounds but maybe those above?

I love my ARs, but compared to a FAL or an AK, they are finicky buggers.
4/30/2006 10:43:11 AM EDT
[#16]
Glad I saw this thread as I was about to try some of this. Never shot Wolf before but was about to try the M193 stuff due to hearing some good opinions and the fact that cost's for quality ammo is getting out of my league.
4/30/2006 10:54:31 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:





I love my ARs, but compared to a FAL or an AK, they are finicky buggers.







My A1 Shorty Bushmaster has shot ABOUT everything  
This AR15 is not PICKY at all. and has never Hic Up EVER

IMI M855
Lake City M855
Winn M855
Santa Barbra SS109
S&B SS109

SA  M193
IMG M193
Win Q3131
Win Q3131A /IMI
federal/Lakecity xm193
P.P./Wolf M193
Fake S&B M193
PMC M193   brown Box


223rem AMMO

Wolf 55
Federals AE 55
REM UMC 55
Win 55
Win 45
Federal 69bthp
Black Hills Blue Box 77gr
Black Hill Blue box 75gr
PMP 55  wish I had more pretty accurate out of the bushwhacker

I might of left some out
4/30/2006 12:35:21 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:





I love my ARs, but compared to a FAL or an AK, they are finicky buggers.







My A1 Shorty Bushmaster has shot ABOUT everything  
This AR15 is not PICKY at all. and has never Hic Up EVER

IMI M855
Lake City M855
Winn M855
Santa Barbra SS109
S&B SS109

SA  M193
IMG M193
Win Q3131
Win Q3131A /IMI
federal/Lakecity xm193
P.P./Wolf M193
Fake S&B M193
PMC M193   brown Box


223rem AMMO

Wolf 55
Federals AE 55
REM UMC 55
Win 55
Win 45
Federal 69bthp
Black Hills Blue Box 77gr
Black Hill Blue box 75gr
PMP 55  wish I had more pretty accurate out of the bushwhacker

I might of left some out



Mine are probably like school girls, still tight and not broken in.  If I still had some I'd send you some of my hand grenade Wolf to try in your invulnerable rifle.  Only probs I have ever had have been with Wolf (excepting the old lacquer stuff which shot fine), go figure.  Some rifles are just particular I guess.
5/7/2006 1:52:42 PM EDT
[#19]
My quick review:

I finally was able to get some range time,

Weapons are as follwed

NEW 20inch model 1 HBAR upper chrome lined chamber/bore  1/9 twist
enhance carrier/w bushy bolt
stag arms lower

Slightly used from EE forum
16 inch bushy HBAR chrome lined chamber/bore  1/9 twist
CMT M16 carrier/used bushy bolt
eagle arms lower

I started the day with slow fire to warm up the barrels wolf fmj and hollow point 62gr followed by some WWB 55gr. Then proceded to dump 6 30rd mags of wolf 62 gr hp for pure fun threw each upper.

Once fun time was over set up 2 rifle targets at 50 meters using wolfs new m193 "nato spec 55gr"

Zeroed both rifles with in 12 shoots, accuracy was on par with any other nato spec ammo I have fired. zero problems keeping all rounds in the x and 10 ring at 50 meters.

I later went from slow fire to all out mag dumps to see if I would have any issues with this ammo.

Zero issuse of FTF OR FTE.  Not one blown primer, both my 16 and 20 rifle fired this ammo with out a hiccup.

All in all a little over 200rnds of wolf m193 were fired threw both weapons, not to include sevral hundred rnds of cheap 62 grn fmj and 62grn hp wolf and about 100rnds of WWB.

All brass was headstamped 2005 lot ppu 0503-02. I really am impressed so far with this ammo, and will be ordering another 1000rns form sportsmansguide this week. Hopefully I will continue to have the same good results

Hvae a nice day
5/7/2006 2:27:37 PM EDT
[#20]
I've never had a problem with lot 44 head stamped 2005.  Can't wait until they come out with 75gr rounds as mentioned by Gunwrtr. I will be stocking up on that!

My guess is that 2004 stuff has problems. I would like to get some '06 just to verify my luck so far...
5/7/2006 2:48:55 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo1.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo2.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo3.html

Is it just my eyes, or do I see the impression if the ejector in a few of those cases?
On the side of hte rim, it also looks like the extraxtor bent the rim back a bit?

Hard to tell conclusively from the images. If those marks are there, then they would be classic signs of overpressure conditions.
5/7/2006 4:40:08 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:
www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo1.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo2.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo3.html

Is it just my eyes, or do I see the impression if the ejector in a few of those cases?
On the side of hte rim, it also looks like the extraxtor bent the rim back a bit?

Hard to tell conclusively from the images. If those marks are there, then they would be classic signs of overpressure conditions.



It's not just your eyes.  That conclusion has been reached on previous pages.  Ammo has gone back to Wolf and I am waiting for a refund check.  Sounds like 2004 may have been an off year for this stuff and that 2005 headstamps work fine.  Personally, I've moved on to Radway and Guat. We'll see how well they work.  Should be no probs.
5/8/2006 5:30:47 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Sabrina asked if I had the origional banded box the stuff was shipped in but I didn't.  Seems the lot number may be on that box as opposed to the blue ink stamped numbers on the 20 rd. cartridge boxes.



Can't tell if it says PPU 0502-02 or PFU 0502-02
i18.photobucket.com/albums/b150/nwijeep/IMG_0429.jpg







really its NNY  No Joke
5/8/2006 5:33:37 AM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo1.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo2.html

www.lewis-family.org/wolf/photos/photo3.html

Is it just my eyes, or do I see the impression if the ejector in a few of those cases?
On the side of hte rim, it also looks like the extraxtor bent the rim back a bit?

Hard to tell conclusively from the images. If those marks are there, then they would be classic signs of overpressure conditions.



It's not just your eyes.  That conclusion has been reached on previous pages.  Ammo has gone back to Wolf and I am waiting for a refund check.  Sounds like 2004 may have been an off year for this stuff and that 2005 headstamps work fine.  Personally, I've moved on to Radway and Guat. We'll see how well they work.  Should be no probs.




RADWAY SOUNDS GOOD
5/8/2006 2:11:17 PM EDT
[#25]
Just found this thread after trying to shoot with the 2004 marked ammo.  It would not cycle a new round into the chamber.  I would fire the 1st shot than click.  no round.  I thought i was safe the first box was the 2005 stuff and it worked fine.  Lesson, dont use any of the 2004 stuff.
5/8/2006 3:14:20 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Just found this thread after trying to shoot with the 2004 marked ammo.  It would not cycle a new round into the chamber.  I would fire the 1st shot than click.  no round.  I thought i was safe the first box was the 2005 stuff and it worked fine.  Lesson, dont use any of the 2004 stuff.



Or just avoide Wolf M193 altogether until they issue a statement that they have taken the information, and resolved the problem.  
5/8/2006 4:19:20 PM EDT
[#27]
I just had some Wolf M193 rounds that fail to extract and they were mark 2005.  I just called Wolf and they told me to send it back to them.  Also they are going to refund my money.
5/9/2006 5:58:26 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Just found this thread after trying to shoot with the 2004 marked ammo.  It would not cycle a new round into the chamber.  I would fire the 1st shot than click.  no round.  I thought i was safe the first box was the 2005 stuff and it worked fine.  Lesson, dont use any of the 2004 stuff.



Or just avoide Wolf M193 altogether until they issue a statement that they have taken the information, and resolved the problem.  




I HEAR THAT!!

I had GREAT RESULTS

but wont buy it anymore?


5/9/2006 7:15:22 PM EDT
[#29]
Well I purchased 1k rounds from ammoman about 3 weeks ago.  I shot about 400 rounds of it with only 3 fail to fire with light hits on the primer.  This was when attempting to bump fire.  Otherwise no issues.

Now I must say Im a noob to rifles and did not look for signs of high pressure that you guys noticed.  In fact I did not know to look for them until this post.  (Thx for the info -- I will definitly keep my eyes open from now on)  Since they appeared to work so good for me I ordered another 1k about a week ago.

I look at my ammo and it apears to all be 2005.  I plan on going to the range later this week and will post a report/pics when I get back.  I shot a S&W MP15.

Thx again for the info guys ...
5/9/2006 7:57:01 PM EDT
[#30]
I just took delivery of two cases from Sportsmans Guide. One is stamped 2004 LOT 44 and one is stamped 2005 LOT 28.  Guess I'll be calling them today and see if they can swap the 2004 for some more recent ammo ...
5/10/2006 3:07:23 PM EDT
[#31]
I called Wolf today ... they did not specify whether 2004 is OK or not ...  But they are sending a UPS call tag to pickup up the case of 2004 and are sending me a box of 2005 .....
5/10/2006 6:37:06 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
I called Wolf today ... they did not specify whether 2004 is OK or not ...  But they are sending a UPS call tag to pickup up the case of 2004 and are sending me a box of 2005 .....



You got to give them credit for taking back the problematic ammo.

I took the same rifle (that I shot the Wolf M193 2004 headstamp that started this thread) to the range today and burned through some Radway and some Guat. and it ran like a sewing machine.  Wolf is just going to have to eat the bad ammo and try to do better.  When they start making true mil-spec ammo, I may risk it again.  Not until they get a rock solid rep on a product line though.

If Federal can make "budget" AE223 that runs well in AR-15s, why the Hell can't Wolf get their shit together?
5/10/2006 6:45:15 PM EDT
[#33]
Aint it strange that there are some AR owners who had great results with the NNY /Wolf

and some AR15`s cant  feed it?

Its the strangest thing ive ever seen?


Its A wonder that LCM855 can Feed in all the M16`s out there?
5/11/2006 12:41:24 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
Another observation from the pics I didn't see mentioned...

All fired rounds shown with primers remaining have a DIMPLE in the middle of the firing pin indentation meaning that at some time BEFORE the rounds shown were fired, the firing pin was BLASTED by one or more PIERCED PRIMERS, causing a small crater in the firing pin tip.

It could have been caused by the rounds with missing primers... or it could have been preexisting.

Either way, REPLACE the firing pin!

Rmpl




Cratered primers are just another sign of over pressure.
5/11/2006 8:12:11 AM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
Aint it strange that there are some AR owners who had great results with the NNY /Wolf

and some AR15`s cant  feed it?

Its the strangest thing ive ever seen?


Its A wonder that LCM855 can Feed in all the M16`s out there?

 

The only thing I can think of to explain it is that there must be "relatively" tight chambers and "loose" chambers within the normal tolerance range for rifles.  Both mine (Armalite and CMMG) are chromed NATO chambers and neither of them like Wolf.  The M855 is made specifically for the M4/M16 and undoubtedly has undergone a great deal of testing prior to being fielded in these weapons.

I get the sense that Wolf is using us as beta testers for their ammo.  When they earn the right to put the NATO cross on their cases, I'll belly up and try some more, until then, I'll stick to what I KNOW works.

BTW, there was a little dimple in the tip of my firing pin caused by the blow outs and I did replace it.
5/11/2006 1:48:31 PM EDT
[#36]
Took 100 rounds of 2005 stamped Wolf M193 and my Colt 6721 to the range today for a quick test.   My 6721 is 100% factory and I used GI 20 Round Colt mags with metal follower.

The first 2 magazines went through without a hitch.  The 3rd, 4th and 5th magazine had one FTF each for a total of 3 FTF for the 100 rounds. I simply pulled back the bolt and chambered a round each time and kept going.  All of the casings had the extractor impression on the back.  Several of the spent casings had darkened areas around the primer.   No FTE or duds .....     For me I'll be using the rest of my Wolf as plinking rounds ....

Wondering if the problem has to do with the brass?  I picked up some spent 5.56 shells that were laying on the floor from somebody before me.  I didn't have a scale or anything but while inspecting the non-Wolf casing it felt heavier.  Has anybody weighed the a Wolf empty casing and see how it compared to an Lake City casing?
5/13/2006 4:19:03 PM EDT
[#37]
Shot about 100 rounds of my '05 stamped Wolf with no issues yesterday.  Used my SW MP15 with several different mags.  Casings had no signs of anything abnormal.
5/14/2006 4:41:31 AM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:
I just recieved 1000 rounds yesterday from sportsmansguide via big brown truck..

All cases are marked 2005 ammo looks good, I will run some this weekend thru my 20inch and one of my 16inch rifles. Wondering if 2005 headstamped M193 will have the same problems? I hope not but we will see..


Have a nice day..



I'm on my second 1000 round lot of (2005) Lot#46,47,48. Both were purchased from Ammoman. I had no issues with the first 1000 rounds. Now it's time to have some fun with the second case.
5/14/2006 5:59:52 AM EDT
[#39]
I have 2000 rounds of the 05 wolf M193. Have shot 500 rounds of it . 1st 3 mags no prob. after that FTF 1-3- per mag. Rifle is new RRA , may be having gumming up issues. We are shooting today and my brother in law has DPMS. I'll have him shoot some and see what happens. Otherwise no blown primers or indications of overpressure problems.
5/14/2006 6:17:14 AM EDT
[#40]
There is something different between rifles.  I have heard on no one with a SW MP15 have issues (me and a buddy and posts here) but I have heard of several issues on RRAs ...  Why could this be?  Also is the RRa rated 556 or 223?

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Wolf M193 Bad Day (Page 2 of 2)

AR Sponsor