AK Sponsor
Posted: 8/21/2024 5:02:31 PM EDT
[Last Edit: huey_crew_chief][Edited]
|
Did you reverse photos 1 & 3? Top: all three pretty close. Left is slightly redder; Middle looks a little darker and flatter finish; Right is a little browner. Middle: The variegation seen in the Bakelite is not unheard of, but that one is crazy. Bottom: The dark, shiny mag looks like plum (dark purple); Middle has a greenish hue; Right is reddish. |
LFW: cross border counter narcotics and hostage rescue. MUST BE WFH!!!
|
Originally Posted By KILLERB6: Did you reverse photos 1 & 3? Top: all three pretty close. Left is slightly redder; Middle looks a little darker and flatter finish; Right is a little browner. Middle: The variegation seen in the Bakelite is not unheard of, but that one is crazy. Bottom: The dark, shiny mag looks like plum (dark purple); Middle has a greenish hue; Right is reddish. The first photo is the brown ones. The second is of course the bake and the shiny brown one. The last is the shiny brown one with two other brown one. It's not plum, I can see purple very well. The photo stinks, but it is shinny dark brown. I never saw one like that. |
|
Originally Posted By jekbrown: That's brown alright. Collectors shouldn't get to excited about "saddle tan" and "firebrick red". The mil contract just said "Brown". If anyone has evidence to the contrary, I'm all ears. Serious AK-74 mag collectors definitely knew the difference. And could tell the difference between the different colors. I did buy the bulgy mags when the price was right, but like you? Thought they were all basically brown. I personally was focusing on all things bakelite. Ended up liquidating everything I had, thanks to the Arfcom curse. I still miss that collection. ETA: Op! The redder "Brown" would be considered Firebrick, the lighter chocolate would be considered Saddle Tan, to collectors. Don't think there would be much price difference between them? But do your research on that. |
AK Sponsor



