Quote History Quoted:
I think the answer is no.
If you believe it's yes then it opens up a whole lot of other problems.
We can't possess 'others' in NY.
If buying a lower is an other then is pulling the upper off a rifle creating possession of an an illegal other?
Generally adding things to an illegal item doesn't negate possession.
So if a lower is an illegal other then adding stuff to it doesn't stop us possessing it.
If an AR lower is an illegal other then so is every other receiver and barreled action.
Do I make an illegal other if I pull the stock off a 10/22?
The text definition starts with 'A weapon'.
I claim that a stripped lower is not a weapon at all by NY law.
If every ffl refuses to transfer lowers then it doesn't matter if they're actually illegal or not.
View Quote
i dont think that you recognize where NYS is going with this.
They're playing the long game.
They dont want people buying components and building up rifles into non-compliant configurations
They're clearly trying to write a law that will pass muster that prohibits anyone but a licensed gunsmith from legally building any sort of firearm.
The only reason last years legislation isnt current law is that it was too broadly written.
Next will be serialization requirements for all major components
Then the semiauto license will be expanded to semi's previously owned prior to the recent bill being passed.
Then they'll expand licensing requirements to lever actions, pump actions, single shots and bolt actions.
Heck, todays bill even slid in the bit about black powder guns having to go through an FFL.
Once everything upstate is licensed the way it is Downstate, they'll start confiscation Australia style.
Bet on it.