Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/3/2006 8:24:48 PM EDT

folks,
see any problem with a lower marked as follows...



re:
ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=247446
and
www.globaltactical.com/axami/shop.php?grd=292&prd=293

thanks,
ar-jedi

Link Posted: 2/3/2006 9:10:09 PM EDT
[#1]


It says AR15.......so I wouldn't take the chance
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 12:58:41 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:

It says AR15.......so I wouldn't take the chance



I would agree.
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 4:07:47 AM EDT
[#3]
IMO, this is not a "Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series" as described in NJS 2C:39-1w.  Shouldn't be a problem.  No different than a Fulton Armory FAR-15 or Rock River Arms LAR-15.

You could call the NJSP Firearms Unit @ 609-882-2000, or better yet write a letter, and tell them it is a model "GT-AR15" made by Stag Arms and will be built in Post-Ban configuration to comply with the substantially identical clause of the Assault Weapon Ban.
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 5:56:15 AM EDT
[#4]
It's not a Colt.....hence not the named Colt AR15 that is banned
Link Posted: 2/4/2006 11:37:57 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
IMO, this is not a "Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series" as described in NJS 2C:39-1w.  Shouldn't be a problem.  No different than a Fulton Armory FAR-15 or Rock River Arms LAR-15.

You could call the NJSP Firearms Unit @ 609-882-2000, or better yet write a letter, and tell them it is a model "GT-AR15" made by Stag Arms and will be built in Post-Ban configuration to comply with the substantially identical clause of the Assault Weapon Ban.



There you go again with logic

Technically, I agree fully with PK90, I just wouldn't take the chance. Especially when you can get other lowers and not have to worry about it.
Link Posted: 2/5/2006 3:04:37 PM EDT
[#6]
I can't see how GT-AR15 = Colt AR-15 and CAR-15 series.  As long as the firearm does not have more than two evil features, it is not substantially identical to the banned firearm.  A manufacturers model name simply does not make a firearm substantially identical the banned firearm.  The AG makes it very clear that "substantially identical" is refering to functionality.
Please take a look at the guidlines the AG has set for the definition of "substantially identical."

www.state.nj.us/lps/dcj/agguide/assltf.htm


Quote directly from the letter:

"A semi-automatic firearm should be considered to be "substantially identical," that is, identical in all material respects, to a named assault weapon if it meets the below listed criteria:

A. semi-automatic rifle that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least 2 of the following:

a folding or telescoping stock;
a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
a bayonet mount;
a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and
a grenade launcher"


Having a model name of GT-AR15 does not meet the criteria to make it a banned assault weapon.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top