Quote History Quoted:
I thought this was for commercial ranges not personal use. Thats what I was told by the borough multiple times.does not regulate the discharge of
View Quote
"does not regulate the discharge of firearms on private property where the property is not
open to the public on a commercial, education,
nonprofit, or membership basis."
But does regulate "real property used for
commercial, educational or non-profit shooting
activities, typically involving rifles, shotguns,
pistols, silhouettes, skeet, trap or black powder."
So it doesn't regulate nonprofit, but does regulate non-profit? (those quotes, by the way, are directly copied from the official document)
The borough doesn't even understand what the hell it says. Real property can be either privately held, or commercially held. Doesn't even go into the sound levels, setbacks that are crazy, civil engineering requirements, etc etc. Not to mention this is borough wide - and this whole craptacular show started between two land owners around wasilla fishhook road. One that has a farm and was pissed off at shooters on a close by 40 acre plot.
Anyway, as has been said, it's a poorly written proposal. And of course, even with the majority of the attendees at the assembly meeting that spoke against it, it was passed on to the planning commision.