I do vote and we shouldn't be forced to form a LLC.
Rossi, I think you are right on target. This CLEO bullshit is just that to most people in here because for one reason or another they feel that will never own a NFA item. I think it's pure appathy for the most part and I've been guilty of it reguarding certain subject for most of my adult life. We all have families, jobs ect and must choose our battles wisely. I really don't know if this is a wise battle to fight, but it can be won. I have most all of the NFA toys I'll ever want, but I am looking for a HK sear and it looks as if the seller and myself have agreed on the terms. I'm willing to help you guys that are considering multiple NFA items in this fight, but I see little to no interest. What do you guys consider the apex of AR ownership? In my book it's the select fire M-16 in any one the many possible cofigurations.
I, for one think the greatest majority of the Sheriff's in this state would welcome a must sign law. We must remember that they are no more than an elected politician in most cases. If we were in thier shoes would we sign? That's a hard call since if he signs and you screw up with the weapon or you are brought up and serious charges his name will be all over the place. Sheriff XYZ signed for this M-16 and we all want to know why. On the other hand if there was a must sign law then he would have no choice unless he knew of a valid reason why he shouldn't sign. If you got in trouble after the ATF approved you nobody could come back on the Sheriff for ANY reason. He was forced to sign and the ATF approved the transfer. He's more or less absolved of any responsibility if he's forced to sign due to state law.
Supressors require a CLEO sing off the same as a machine gun....
TD