User Panel
Posted: 7/16/2008 8:51:18 AM EDT
Well, I've now seen the picture of the gal with the pink AR and have to say that the LaRue gal is definitely showing more skin in my opinion.
The LaRue model has her vest completely unfastened with tons of cleavage showing due to her holding the rifle low on her stomach. Her BDU pants are unfastened so that you can see her panties, her belt is unfastened too. Jerad's gal has her vest completely fastened and she's holding the rifle in front of her chest blocking any cleavage display. You can't even hardly see any of her belly skin either. You also can't see anything below her waistline as you can with the LaRue model. On top of it all she's also wearing a hat with her hair in front of her unlike the LaRue model with no hat and hair pulled back to display more skin. So what do you all think? Which photo do you think is showing more 'skin'? If one of them should not be allowed to be posted, which one should it be? Do you think there's some favortism being shown to a site sponsorer? |
|
Well of course everyone knows where I stand. But I don't believe either photo should be a problem with the current COC. If this doesn't get resolved I too will not be buying a new membership. I've never had a direct dispute with the site staff, I normally just lay low and keep quite, but this is rediculus.
Jerad |
|
An overzealous move was made and it requires a lot of crow to be eaten to soothe the masses. It was obviously pulled in haste and in no way, shape or form violates the boards Code of Conduct. Its really not the big of a deal but my opinion remains the same; jump in and say that it was taken down before an educated decision was made. This way we can go back to talking about bacon, dogs and Iran instead of griping about trigger happy moderator-type dudes.
~Ed ETA: I think the backhanded jab at Eric was more annoying to me. I've never met the man, nor talked to him in person, but it seems to me he does a very good job at handling business here in the MO HTF. I've not seen anything he didn't deal with in a timely matter in my short tenure here. Too many cooks spoil the broth. Our cook does just fine thank you very much. ~Ed |
|
not to mention complicated by the fact that people decide to continue to post something already in dispute.
this is being discussed in staff. |
|
I agree with some of what you are saying Mr Slayer. People do have a tendency to keep poking at a topic that is obviously taboo. However, can you seriously join in this discussion and tell us that the photo in question violated ANY of the CoC guidelines? Please share with us the violated part of the Conduct. Blown way out of proportion me thinks. Thanks for chiming in though!
~Ed |
|
i have im'd with the parties involved, and the discussion is still ongoing.
BOTD has been a MAJOR problem and sore point for staff on this site for years. |
|
I 100% agree with you. I allow my 12 year old boys to browse the site under my supervision; with the exception of BoTD and Team Members section. I have no issues with those forums either, as you know what your going to get when you enter them. Graphic nudity has no place here in the HTF's. <Not that Im opposed to looking mind you>, but rather, Id like to know my kids can keep up too when the topic is something that pertains to them and learning more about this hobby. From the tone of your posts, I assume that your not going to talk about it or have been asked not to until someone else at a higher pay grade makes a decision.
Do you honestly think anyone was offended by Jared's pic? Id let my boys look at her without hesitation. Even my wife thought it was a classy pic. I think what most of the folks are trying to say is that paid members that want to upload a tactful pic of their lady should be allowed. I try not to speak for others, but look at Larue girl! Jared's lady friend in no way came close to that, and the Larue pic roams free. |
|
First thing is Jerad.....You have a gorgeous woman. You should be proud. I dont think your picture was in any way shape or form, over the top. That being said, the Site Staff have a job to do. You may not agree with it, but that is what is great about our society. Now who got teh ban over this??? Inquiring minds want to know.
And +1 on what Edipus said. |
|
no one, nor was that even on the plate as far as i am concerned. |
|
|
Good deal because we love our HTF guys!!!! |
||
|
I'm not familiar with the pic in question, and would appreciate either something showing up in my email inbox, or a link to a new thread in the actual BOTD forum.
If it's really that good, and goes to my email via "Email User" button, I will reply back w/ a really nice pic and make it worth your while...... first caller. |
|
Go to the locked thread in MOHTF. I think it is on the last page. |
|
|
Holy wow. I saw that thread on pg.1 but didn't see the girl. Had no idea it became a popcorn thread as I just read the first few posts.
For your troubles, sir...... [check your email]. |
|
Thanks, but I have that one saved already. It is very nice though!!! |
|
|
I hope the staff wakes up and sees that there is a problem here. |
|
|
Yeah, like the problem that I have to pay money to see the BOTD (which I won't do now) |
||
|
I tried to bring the topic back to the pink AR by criticizing his choice of painting that retro upper rather than the girl issue. |
|
|
Apparently the hypocrisy of the site staff is being discussed, by the site staff. I have my doubts however that anything will change. I'm afraid BaNo was right. |
||
|
and you'd be wrong....
the thread is no unlocked and i am restoring the links. eric we need to talk. im me a phone number |
|
The_Beer_Slayer, I'm not sure what all discussions and decisions were made, but I thank you for your honesty in your IM's to me, and your diligence about getting this set straight.
|
|
here is the word from above....
pics are ok. IP's can post BOTD in their respective forums as it's considered advertising and their forums are considered an extension of their company website. Such pics in the IP forum are NOT authorised for posting outside of their site or anywhere else other than BOTD. In the future if you guys have issues it really helps to keep a cool head and discuss things. |
|
Thank you TBS. Fairness was all that was ever asked for.
Whew, I didn't have to resign my high-paid Mod job over this. |
|
Not yet!! |
|
|
Werd. |
||
|
Somebody please explain what the hell BOTD means before I put a napkin on my head!!!
|
|
Babe Of The Day It's in the GD board BTW, BEFORE you get all worked up..........................NO NUDITY ALLOWED !!!! PursuitSS |
|
|
Babe Of The Day. As a Team Member it is your job to get the most value from your paid dues and loiter in the BOTD Exchange Forum. Once there you can vote whether you prefer your gals skinny as rib bones, or with a little meat on 'em. Then check out the threads about Russian Cheerleaders, Underboob, My Gal Part 3, Girls with Guns, Kelly Ripa (), etc. That forum is FULL of win!! |
|
|
Kane hasnt been getting the most out of his team membership. Have you been under a rock??? |
|
|
Kane is a Marine, he knows how to get pornography, he doesn't need the BOTD superultranonudiesoft core. Hell I bet there's an MCO on how to acquire pornography in temperate climates. |
||
|
See, they took care of this thing the right way and then i was forced to bite the bullet and become a team member.
I feel like part of the cool crowd now. |
|
So all this censorship and crap is because Jerad's girlfriend is a babe? He was showing her with the custom pink rifle he built her.
Why did the space modulator just nominate her for this BOTD thing? I enjoy the MoHTF so much that I buy memberships to show my support for the MoHTF and don't go to the other parts of this site. And as a former Marine, I don't enjoy looking at pictures of naked women, I like to touch, taste, see, and hold them. I just can't do those things at work unless I become president. |
|
|
||||
|
|
That's downright awesome. There aren't too many states folks can say that about.
All my life, I've been told there's no such thing. |
||
|
True dat. Thats like when people say to me...."You used to be a Ranger?" |
|||
|
Yeah he "Used" to be.. now he is just a nasty guardsman! |
||||
|
Well Im a TEAM member now.!!!
ETA- I believe that the site staff cam to the right conclusion. So after all these years......Here I am bitches |
|
Dam that hurts.... |
|||||
|
Welcome. |
|
|
A former Marine is one who no longer is in active service of the Corps. Once a Marine always a Marine applies. A ex-Marine is one who has been dishonorably discharged from the Corps and no longer rates the title of Marine. |
|||
|
Oh, I am *so* kidding. My grandfather was enlisted Army in WWII and Korea, and 99.9% of his buddies at the VFW hall were "former" Marines. I spent a LOT of time there (and the obligatory 'nickel coffee' cafe next door) and one of my major regrets in life is that I was too young/immature to properly appreciate it/them. |
|
|
Nuthin but love for ya brotha! Nuthin but love!!! But not in "That" way....... |
||||||
|
Once again my gaydar has alerted me to some potential gheyness in this thread.
|
|
Methinks your gaydar may be broken due to the overwhelming amount of gayness in the MoHTF as of late. |
|
|
Keep telling yourself that!!! |
|||||||
|
You must be thinking of Eric, he does love you in "That" way.... |
||||||||
|
I have no clue what a "Jerad girl" is, but assume you guys are referring to the photo/model we used in the "LaRue Ads" thread I started a few days ago...I'll gladly black-out anything deemed offensive, if you want.
The ad that ran in several industry magazines for the better part of a year and I didn't see harm in posting it in our industry forum. I have yet to be contacted about any images I've posted. Feel free to share your comments via IM. Thanks, Mark Fingar |
|
Nope, the 'Jared' girl was a picture of the wife of a member of the MOHTF. She was showing off the pink camo'd ar that Jared painted for her. The pic of her was less revealing than the Larue pic that everyone knows and loves. However, Jared's pic was removed as a BOTD and then the thread was locked when his fellow MOHTF members were defending him and his posting of said photo.
The comment was brought up that Jared's wife was showing less skin than the picture you have, yet your picture was allowed all over the forums and Jared's was not. An insinuation of a double-standard was made in another thread. Site staff were discussing this while we were, and common sense prevailed. No offense was meant to be sent your way. |
|
No offense taken...I just want to make sure I'm following the rules.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.