Posted: 10/6/2005 10:28:05 AM EDT
(NOTE: I would have put this in the "SPORTS" forum, but I thought it would mean more/have more interest here...) www.al.com/sports/birminghamnews/kscarbinsky.ssf?/base/sports/1128504640150110.xml&coll=2
The Birmingham News
Sports columnist Kevin Scarbinsky
Liberty can't pair UA or AU with Blazers
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
Alabama and Auburn aren't thinking about the Liberty Bowl. They have other plans for New Year's Eve.
They should. At the moment, they're the best football teams in the SEC.
Thanks to a crafty deal, the Tide and Tigers won't have to worry about a postseason trip to Memphis for years.
They may play there. They just won't have to get all shook up about it. Because they won't have to play UAB.
It's in the contract that'll match teams from the SEC and Conference USA in the Liberty Bowl from 2006 through 2009.
That's the power of the SEC.
All SEC Commissioner Mike Slive had to do, back in July, was let it slip that his teams preferred to play only teams from other BCS conferences, as usual, in their next lineup of bowl agreements to start next season.
The Liberty Bowl and Conference USA got the hint and took it from there. To make up for C-USA's position as a BCS outsider, they proposed a big, fat asterisk to Big Brother SEC: No rematches. No wannabe in-state rivals.
If you meet during the regular season, as LSU and Tulane will, you can't meet again in the Liberty Bowl. If you live in the same state, as Alabama and UAB do, you can't share the same field.
That cleared the final hurdle for the SEC to return to Memphis, which it preferred over Houston all along.
No less a C-USA cheerleader and BCS critic than Gene Bartow called it "a win-win deal."
"I think it's good for everybody," the former UAB AD and current Harris Poll voter said. "It would have been better if there were no asterisk, but I don't think that should've been a deal-breaker."
The Liberty Bowl was smart enough to realize it needs the SEC to regain some credibility it didn't have when it matched C-USA and the Mountain West. C-USA was smart enough to realize it needs the Liberty Bowl at the top of its postseason lineup to help push for even greater respectability.
The asterisk, according to SEC executive associate commissioner Mark Womack, is hard and fast and not negotiable. A school like Mississippi State can't waive it to play a school like Southern Miss.
So the asterisk will eliminate some intriguing matchups, but give the SEC credit for not shutting out C-USA completely.
As for Alabama and Auburn, it's not in their best interest to play UAB in the Liberty Bowl because the field there won't be level.
The bowl gets first choice from C-USA, but it'll be in the final rotation of SEC selections. Without the asterisk, a very good UAB team could have a chance to make history against a very ordinary Alabama or Auburn team.
Some important UAB people understand that. They just can't admit it in public. Bartow, the elder statesman, is different. He can see and say that the Blazers vs. anyone in the SEC - anytime, anywhere - is an opportunity too good to pass up.
"When UAB gets a chance to go to that bowl," he said, "whoever they play, it'll be big."
Give him Liberty, even with handcuffs.
|
|
|