Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I am glad that it got done! Anyone that does not want any part of paying for it, then don't buy any electronic pull tabs, sports apparel, or tickets to the game.
And what about the additional taxes? Is there any proof, anywhere, stating that they are NOT going to raise taxes for this? This is the Minnesota/Minneapolis government we're talking about here - they don't do squat with raising taxes somewhere...
Right now there are no additional taxes. The city of Minneapolis is diverting some of it hospitality taxes for their 150 million and the state is doing the gambling and user fee (tax) for their part. There is no general fund or tax being implemented right now. Like you said, this is the state of Minnesota, so maybe down the line there will be, but for right now there is none.
I can guarantee you that the pull-tabs will fail to generate the "expected" revenue. Also, Ziggy still owes back property taxes on the Dome. I can guarantee you those will never be repaid and 10-20 years after the new stadium is built there will be back-taxes on that one that never get paid. All in all this translates to a loss for the tax payers. How do I know this? Simple. It is the history of nearly every single publicly funded sports stadium.
Also, building the new Vikings stadium on the site of the existing dome is a very bad idea. There are few restaurants, bars, and other business on that end of town that will benefit from the new stadium. And of course that is always the promise that the owners peddle as a reason for the public coffers to be opened up to help build there new stadium. They argue the new stadium will generate millions in tax revenue as new businesses, restaurants, bars, etc. open up around the stadium. If this were true, then where are the multitude of bars, restaurants, and businesses that opened up around the Dome? Also, no business owner is going to open a business JUST because 6-10 nights per year they may see increased business before/after a football game. No, a business owner selects a location so he/she will see a steady flow of business year round.
Here are some quotes from the tons of articles and studies done over the decades that show publically funded stadiums are a mal investment:
But there's no reason to sacrifice the interest of taxpayers to that of sports fans. Stadiums are not a good financial investment. Public finance experts Roger Noll and Andrew Zimbalist concluded: "no recent facility appears to have earned anything approaching a reasonable return on investment and no recent facility has been self-financing in terms of its impact on net tax revenues."
Thus, government stadium "investments" have consistently generated meager results. Robert Baade and Allen Sanderson looked at a dozen metropolitan areas for The Heartland Institute and found no net employment hike. Separately Baade reviewed 36 cities and found no net statistical increase in economic growth.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/governmentfunded-stadiums-not-worth-price-admission
The use of public funds to lure or keep teams begs several questions, the foremost of which is, "Are these good investments for cities?" The short answer to this question is "No." When studying this issue, almost all economists and development specialists (at least those who work independently and not for a chamber of commerce or similar organization) conclude that the rate of return a city or metropolitan area receives for its investment is generally below that of alternative projects. In addition, evidence suggests that cities and metro areas that have invested heavily in sports stadiums and arenas have, on average, experienced slower income growth than those that have not.
http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/re/articles/?id=468
IMO the money to pay for the stadium should have come 100% from:
The owner(s)
The NFL franchise
The players
Ticket buyers
New investors
Also, the real straw that broke the camels back for me was that the Vikings, both owners and players, expected us tax payers to be loyal fans and supporters and to cough over hundreds of millions of dollars to finance the stadium. Yet the moment there was a possibility the Vikings may not get public funds to help build a new stadium what do they do? Threaten to move the team from Minnesota. Yeah, so much for loyalty. If the Vikings are such a good investment, then Ziggy should have no problem finding private investors to fund the portion of the stadium bill he himself isn't willing to pay for. But the fact that he wants public money proves that he knows a stadium is a losing deal and the only way for him to make a profit off it is to get some sucker investors to give him free money that he isn't on the hook for sharing his profits with. Those sucker investors are you and I, the public.