In plain vanilla terms: Guy in CT dies leaving behind a collection of firearms. Upon an inventory of the decedents collection, the executor of the estate discovers two very "old" but like new Colt Sporter AR15s. Evidentally, they were never registered as required by CT regs. The estate now knows that these rifles can not be kept in Connecticut and would very much like to sell them out of state rather than cut up the lower receivers, thus destroying valuable property, legal for sale in 49 other states. The estate does not understand why "inherited" firearms can not be treated similar to someone moving into Connecticut. When you move here from another state, you're allowed 90 days sell them out of state via an FFL. One would think that an estate would have the same "window" of time to properly and legally sell them out of state without fear of any type of recrimination. It sure doesn't seem fair. They just want to be above board and handle things properly.
Any opinions, suggestions, or experience with something like this?