Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:
I dont know why he would want to run for Gov again. That seems like it would be a step back for him. While I despised Webb for a democrat Warner doesnt seem like that bad of a politician he isnt a hard core leftist like some of them are.
You mean the guy that supported the Clinton AWB, would allow local municipalities to enact their own gun rules, and has stated he would have vetoed any repeal of the one gun a month rule.
Yeah no thanks.
From the Virginia Sports Shooting Association article that addresses the exact same issues you are bringing up (http://virginiashootingsportsassociation.blogspot.com/2007/09/its-official-mark-warner-to-run-for-us.html):
"As Governor, Warner did not veto any of the pro-gun legislation that made it through the General Assembly. This includes full preemption as well as a partial roll-back of one gun-a-month - Delegate Bill Janis' bill providing that concealed handgun permit holders could by as many handguns in a month as they wanted, that were part of the 17 pro-gun bills that passed in 2004."
I don't see Warner as necessarily a bad thing for gun rights in VA, since his actions as Governor speak for themselves. And we all know that Republicans like his Senatorial predecessor, John Warner, could be counted on as champions of Virginian's gun rights.
If i am not mistaken John Warner and Robb voted for the 94 AWB.................scratch that he did not......but robb did
"Dear ...,
Thank you for contacting me to share your views about assault weapons. I appreciate your thoughts on this matter.
During the Senate's consideration of S.1805, the Protection of Lawful
Commerce in Arms Act, I offered an amendment to the gun immunity bill
based on legislation that Senator Feinstein (D-Ca) and I introduced,
S.2109 (the Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act). This amendment
would have extended the Assault Weapons Ban for another ten years, and
it passed the Senate with bipartisan support by a vote of 52-47.
However, the gun immunity bill, S.1805, failed in the Senate by a vote
of 8 to 90. Our bill, S.2109, is still pending before the Senate.
Signed into law in 1994, the Assault Weapons Ban placed a 10 year
prohibition on domestic manufacture, transfer, or possession of certain
semi-automatic assault weapons. The ten year ban ends on September 13,
2004. Consequently, unless Congress and the President act prior to
September 13, 2004, weapons like Uzis and AK-47s will once again be
produced in America, and more and more often, these weapons will fall
into the hands of criminals who lurk in our neighborhoods. President
Bush has indicated that he supports a straight 10 year extension of this
current law.
Some in the Senate, including myself, opposed the ban a decade ago,
believing it would do little to reduce crime, and fearing that it could
threaten the Constitutional rights of law-abiding gun-owners and
hunters. However, a decade of experience has provided us with key
facts, and, consequently, my opinions on the ban have evolved.
The Assault Weapons Ban has made our communities safer and has not
infringed on the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Recent Department of
Justice record indicate that the use of banned assault weapons in
crimes has declined measurably –– by 65% in one analysis - since the
measure took effect. And, law enforcement officials from across
Virginia, and indeed across the United States, have supported an
extension of the Assault Weapons Ban because they know it makes
America's communities safer.
Please be assured that I understand your views on this legislation.
As a gun owner and hunter, and as a United States Senator privileged to
represent the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia in the United
States Senate, I am a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. I will
continue to support public policies that ensure the responsible and
appropriate use of guns while also protecting the constitutional right
of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.
Again, thank you for the benefit of your views.
With kind regards, I am
Sincerely,
[signed]
John Warner"