I am still waiting for responses to my emails sent to two others. Here is an email response I received today.
Dear Mr. Harmon:
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for writing my office to express your concerns regarding gun control legislation. It's good to hear from you.
The particular legislation that you have contacted me about is actually pending before the Illinois General Assembly. Therefore, you need to contact your state legislators as they are the ones who can have the most impact on these issues.
As you may know, I strongly defend the Second Amendment and am continually concerned about the erosion of our rights. Generally, I oppose new laws on gun control because often they are repetitive of state law. Most importantly, however, new gun laws end up becoming a burden for the law-abiding citizens of this nation and an infringement on our Second Amendment rights. Many citizens choose to own a firearm for a variety of reasons: for sport, for hunting, or for protection. In my view these are all good and valid reasons.
I often hear that if we only had one more gun-control law on the books the Columbine tragedy could have been avoided. While one can argue from different points of view, I think the comments by Mr. Darrell Scott, father to a victim of the Columbine attack, transcends the sound bites and intricacies of debate. He testified with wisdom before the House Judiciary Committee on May 27, 1999--"No amount of gun laws can stop someone who spends months of planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our own hearts."
Unfortunately, many in Congress have pushed gun control as a means to reduce crime. Ironically, many of these people are the same ones who consistently oppose any attempt to get tough on crime. I'm convinced that we must firmly punish criminals, especially repeat offenders who commit most of the violent crimes. It's time that we finally hold offenders responsible for their actions instead of infringing upon the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens.
One of the most frustrating elements of the gun-control debate is its complete lack of logic and factual context. For example, in former President Clinton's last State of the Union address, he stated his support for a licensing system for hand guns--"Every state in the country already requires hunters and automobile drivers to have a license. I think they ought to do the same thing for handgun purchases." The problem with the President's comments is that criminals simply ignore licensing requirements. Furthermore, they are not required to comply with such laws due to a 1968 Supreme Court interpretation of the Fifth Amendment (Haynes vs. US), which found that compliance would violate the right of an individual from self-incrimination.
I was pleased to see President Bush's comments on Project Safe Neighborhoods, regarding the need to fully enforce current gun laws, before enacting any new gun control legislation. The program will establish a network of law enforcement and community initiatives targeted at gun violence. It also incorporates and builds upon the success of existing programs. In Richmond, Virginia, for example, during the first year of what's called Project Exile, homicides were reduced by 40 percent; and armed robberies were reduced by 30 percent, in the first year alone. And thanks to Boston's Operation Cease-Fire, in almost two years, no one under the age of 17 was shot.
Again, thanks for keeping me updated on your concerns regarding gun control. Rest assured, I will continue my defense of the Second Amendment. I look forward to hearing from you again in the future.
Sincerely,
JOHN SHIMKUS
Member of Congress
Thought I would share too.
4X4SC