I don't know but.............
IMHO, it's just plain wrong when the Govt owns the land and the Govt lets some pvt party run the place a for a profit.
Then, I also notice that there are many Govt agencies that use Clark Rifle's facilities at "no charge." Shouldn't the Govt agencies be using a Govt facility? If the Govt Agencies had to pay.......I bet they would be asking for a Govt range.
OK.....so, my suggestion would be to revert English Pit back to Govt Control under the Parks and Rec. Dept. Of course, I'd also welcome a new range......if the budget could handle it.
As for the operations.........well, the range crew could be Govt contract workers or full time Govt Employees of the Parks and Rec Dept. And, when the the various Govt Agencies wasn't training............well, it'd be open for the taxpayers use. No fee or small fee, whatever.
I'd imagine that Pittman-Robertson Funds might/could be available and used for this purpose. But, what do I know.......
Anyway........think about it......
The Govt own's alot of boat ramps but, I don't see some pvt company collecting a fee to launch a boat off of the Govt's ramp.
Maybe, it's just about how the fishermen/boaters get a BETTER DEAL vs. us shooters?
Aloha, Mark