Quoted:
Since when did a post require complete legal accuracy??
Doesn't matter what me or anyone else says its up to the individual to know the law.
But i'm glad I gave you the opportunity to flaunt your obviously vast superior intellect and understanding of the law(as your title suggests).
You obviously enjoy it.
I just hate seeing bullshit spread as the truth. Let me go over a few here that would probably be closer to making you say wtf.
The original bullet for the m16 was designed to tumble in flight, making it more deadly.
Racking a shotgun will scare away bad guys.
Bird shot is perfectly fine for home defense.
The bullet from an m16 rises as it leaves the barrel and that is why the zero is the same at 25 meters as it at 300.
I could go on and on. When people pass this stuff off someone who does not know might believe it and then pass on that bullshit since they learned from someone who made a statement and therefore knew what the fuck he was talking about.
When it deals with the law making a statement as the gospel truth can get someone in trouble for believing you. It is not that I don't like you, you have never done anything to me as far as I know but I can't sit by while you give out faulty law advice when I know better.
I'll make you a deal. I won't try to tell you how to patch up bleeding motherfuckers and you don't give out law advice to people might not know any better.
ARFCOM IS SERIOUS BIDNESS!