I was not suggesting an initiative to protect our rights and to force the government to do so also, but rather its use as a tool of the antis. As you say, the gov finds ways around them too easily, when they want to.
The problem is that the "majority" are sheeple that will probably never agree with us. I truly believe that someday "the people" will simply support a Constitutional amendment that will remove the Second from the Bill of Rights. Won't be soon, but it, along with a number of other similar amendments, will eventually happen, it's all a matter of timing and "packaging".
The amendment process is part of the Constitution, so what would pro-gun people do if the "majority" votes to take out the Second? You no longer have a Constitutional argument to make. Now we are simply down to "inalienable", but they didn't mention guns in that statement, although it wasn't a restrictive and all inclusive one, and is not as persuasive to many.
And frankly, though he wouldn't agree with it, I think Jefferson wouldn't be particularly surprised by it. I think he would be shocked that the Constitution has survived as long as it has, in its more or less original form.