I have sent emails off to the usual suspects - our "elected" officials, and asked about this.
My question is below the main article.
Friday, October 24, 2003 -
Random searches on ferries may return By Ray Rivera
Seattle Times staff reporter
Ferry passengers won't have to endure airportlike screening under new federal maritime-security regulations designed to protect U.S. ports and shipping lanes from terrorist attack.
But the rules, announced yesterday by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge,
could spell the return of random searches of vehicles boarding state ferries. The Washington State Ferry System abandoned the searches last year because of costs and after drawing complaints from commuters and criticism from lawmakers and civil libertarians. The state Attorney General's Office added to those concerns when it questioned whether the searches ran afoul of the Washington Constitution, which provides protections against random searches.
Ferry officials yesterday were reviewing the rule changes and tallying what it would cost to implement them.
They also have asked the Attorney General's office to re-examine the search provisions.
The new rules, which differ little from interim regulations put in place in July, give more flexibility to ports, ferries and shipping companies in shaping security plans, said Jim Serrill, director of seaport security for the Port of Seattle.
"The Coast Guard did a pretty good job of getting industry and public input," Serrill said. "They clearly recognized that a one-size-fits-all approach is not the way to go."
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., praised the changes. "The new, more flexible plan will improve safety without compromising service for our communities."
The rules keep in place the Coast Guard's three-tiered threat-security level implemented earlier this year. The levels, similar to the Homeland Security Department's color-coded threat levels, require varying security procedures for each level.
Ports, ferries and shipping companies have until the end of the year to submit security plans to the Coast Guard that spell out how they would implement the new regulations. If the Coast Guard approves, they would have until July 2004 to implement the plans.
The new regulations would require large commercial and passenger ships to have security officers and electronic vessel-identification systems on board.
An original proposal called for all ship and ferry passengers to be screened, their bags X-rayed and their vehicles searched, even under the lowest threat level.
Ferry officials worried the measures would be too costly and cause travel delays.
Under the new system, the ferries can substitute airportlike screening with alternatives, including increased security patrols as well as random screenings of passengers, baggage and vehicles. While the constitutional question over searches remains, the preamble to the new regulations suggests that federal law would pre-empt state law.
Earlier this year, a similar question arose concerning random searches of vehicles approaching Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. In a legal opinion, the Transportation Security Administration concluded such searches did not violate state law because, among other reasons, courts have consistently recognized the need to protect the public at airports and courthouses.
Port security has been a pressing issue in Washington, home to busy sea ports and the nation's largest ferry system, carrying more than 26 million passengers a year.
Ferry officials were meeting yesterday to read through the lengthy rules to determine how they will affect passengers and the cash-poor ferry system's budget.
"We have been working feverishly to determine how we will apply regulations that became effective in July," said Scott Davis, Washington State Ferries safety-system manager. "Now what we have to do is determine if there's a difference between what was published then and what was published today, and whether there's a difference from a cost perspective."
Ferry spokeswoman Patricia Patterson told The Associated Press that the estimated $20 million cost would be the biggest hurdle. Earlier this year, the Coast Guard estimated the cost at $11 million to implement the ferry-system plan and $4 million annually thereafter.
The federal government has issued grants for port security, including $14.7 million total for the Ports of Seattle, Tacoma and Everett, and $9.5 million for ferry security.
But finding additional money to meet Coast Guard regulations could prove daunting for a ferry system that doesn't have additional funds for security in its biennial budget.
"We're going to try to put together a plan we can commit to," Davis said. "It'll be up to the Coast Guard to decide if that's adequate. We're not going to put something in the plan that we don't have the resources to accomplish."
MY QUESTION I have a question about the proposed rules for the Washington State Ferry System concerning firearms.
Just what the heck is going to happen if the requirement of "increased security patrols as well as random screenings of passengers, baggage and vehicles" does go into effect?
What will you guys have in place for people like myself that have a concealed weapons permit and are carrying a weapon if we get identified to be searched?
What about our vehicles? I know that sometimes when I am going out shooting or coming back from a gun show in Seattle that I might have a new firearm or two and a few rounds of ammunition.
What are you going to have in place to PROTECT my rights as an American citizen and as a lawful resident of Washington State as far as firearms go?
I certainly hope that the WSF System won't pull a bonehead stunt and ban firearms from the ferry's like they have DOT legal gasoline cans.
I am also going to be contacting my elected representitives for both state and federal on this issue.
Thank you for your consideration.
|