Editorial: Taking guns to work
Car-storage proposal infringes on property rights of employers
Wednesday, September 1, 2010 02:52 AM
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/editorials/stories/2010/09/01/taking-guns-to-work.html?sid=101
The Columbus Dispatch
Not long after the state's concealed-carry bill went into effect in 2004, many, if not most, of Ohio's private employers let everyone know exactly where they stood on the issue.
The state had given law-abiding Ohioans who met certain requirements the right to obtain a license that allows them to carry concealed firearms, but many employers were having none of it. Exercising their private-property rights, they banned employees, visitors and customers from carrying guns anywhere on their property, including parking lots.
But now a bipartisan group of 31 members of the Ohio House - including two from Franklin County, Reps. Cheryl Grossman, R-Grove City, and Nancy Garland, D-New Albany - wants to chip away at those gun bans that fall under private-property rights. House Bill 571, introduced last week, would forbid employers from prohibiting employees who have concealed-carry licenses from storing their handguns in locked cars on their employers' property.
This new bill is just as out of line as Ohio Senate Bill 239, which would allow people with concealed-carry licenses to take firearms into bars, restaurants and other places serving alcohol - places currently off-limits to pistol-packing patrons. The same bill also would allow license-holders to keep loaded handguns within easy reach inside cars and other motor vehicles.
The bars-in-guns bill passed the Senate in May and awaits action in the House, where it ran into a temporary snag but is, unfortunately, likely to pass and then likely to be signed by Gov. Ted Strickland.
Why the backing for this wrongheaded bill? Because the National Rifle Association and similar groups have disproportional influence over lawmakers compared with the majority of Ohioans who support reasonable restrictions on guns but who have no powerful lobby to represent their views.
The guns-in-cars proposal, which would erode private-property rights, is likely to draw fire from business owners and their organizations, some of which ought to be able to match lobbying clout with the NRA. Still, the success of such laws in about a dozen states is discouraging. A similar law went into effect in Indiana on July 1, despite strong protests from business groups, including the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, which is considering a legal challenge.
As with all concealed-carry and open-carry laws, not much time elapses after they are passed before the same gun lobby that helped get these laws enacted then turns around and launches an assault on any exceptions. Lawmakers who want to curry favor with the NRA introduce legislation to remove those exceptions. Eventually, spineless legislators in both parties, afraid of being portrayed as anti-gun and anti-Second Amendment, turn a deaf ear to police officers and citizens who want sensible gun laws.
Ohio business owners will have to work hard to make legislators just as cognizant of constitutionally protected private-property rights as they are of the Second Amendment.