User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/16/2005 8:51:07 PM EDT
[#1]
No, because the law applies to semi-automatic CENTERFIRE rifles only. This allows for rifles such as the Rhineland Arms R22 to be sold in California. However, this does not allow for standard AR-15 type lower receivers with .22lr uppers. This is because they can still accept standard magazines and standard centerfire uppers. Note that this allows for any rimfire caliber, including .22 magnum, .17 HMR, etc.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2005 8:53:08 PM EDT
[#2]
Yea I'm not worried about AR lowers because I don't own one, I was just curious to see if the ArmiJager AP74 was a legit deal in CA.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2005 9:26:07 PM EDT
[#3]
I have an AT-22 with a collapable stock, 20 round magazines, pistol grip, but not bayonet lug (yet).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/16/2005 10:41:21 PM EDT
[#4]
http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/903/sar155qf.jpg
I'd like to see the British Parker-Hale SAR-22.15 and SAR-22.15CAR make their U.S. debut www.parker-hale.com/ Might not happen though because of the "non-sporting" features.hinking.gif |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 5:54:07 AM EDT
[#5]
The only .22 cal rim fire firearms that are assault weapons in California are handguns.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 8:38:03 AM EDT
[#6]
Well...if you had a Roberti-Roos AR lower and never put anything other than a .22lr upper on it, it will still be an assault weapon.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 4:55:02 PM EDT
[#7]
Not meant as a thread hi-jack, but are .22lr high cap mags legal in CA?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 5:02:28 PM EDT
[#8]
As long as you owned them before Jan 1st 2000 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 5:36:23 PM EDT
[#9]
Ah, just like centerfire mags. Crap, I was looking to buy new ones for a Ciener kit...guess that's a no-go. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 6:37:03 PM EDT
[#10]
Yep, if it holds 11 rounds its a babykiller. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 8:30:42 PM EDT
[#11]
A .22 rifle is an AW if the receiver is registered with the state as one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/17/2005 10:14:54 PM EDT
[#12]
Doesn't short barrel rifle, in any calibre, count as assault weapon ?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2005 6:40:18 AM EDT
[#13]
The question that I asked Bushmaster one year ago was the ability to purchase this
The lower receiver is not on the Harrott v. County of Kings decision AND the caliber was rim-fire. The answer I received back from Bushmaster was a No GO, since the receiver can potentially accept a .223 upper and would be considered an assaut weapon by the Kassler decision. But Bushmaster's argument is moot since Harrott supercedes Kasler right? I'm sure everyone's read this right? click here Anyway, these are pretty nice though RB Precision and Rhineland |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2005 9:39:36 AM EDT
[#14]
No, that counts as an NFA rifle. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2005 4:49:34 PM EDT
[#15]
I thought the NFA part can be dealt with by paying the $200 federal stamp tax but the CA DOJ short barrel part needs a seperate license just like mechine guns, which is impossible to get. |
||
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
