... Please! New to HK and have enjoyed reading this section. Fell in love with the USC/UMPs recently and am looking to start my project soon. I plan on running with the USC for a while SBR'd with the ~8" barrel. Will do full conversion at later date. Mostly wanted to hear thoughts on these two calibers, will give you my situation to help:
- Will be SBR with a .45 cal suppressor.
- Have Glock 23 .40 cal with lots of ammo.
Importance levels:
1) sound suppression - which would be quieter with factory ammo out of a .45 can? Is there a significant difference? 5 db means little to me, 20 db is more! I've read too many opinions saying both are quieter that I'm confused now.
2) knockdown power - in the unfortunate chance I may have to use this double NFA scary black item to save my life from a home intruder. Is .45 that much more signifant than .40? I feel confident I can place shots well but I'm realistic and have no experience with my adrenaline pumping in the dark at 3am after being suddenly awoke and having a suppressed Hk in hand.
3) Availability of parts - mainly with the shorter barrel first, are .45 cal parts (barrel, mags, etc) more readily available? What about ammo?
4) Cost/Interchangeability - I'd rather spend more to get what is needed or best for my situation but should parts and ammo be part of the decision from a cost standpoint? I like the idea of having plenty of .40 cal ammo for both my glock and hk... Especially in a hurried grab and go situation.
The bottom line is for a $2-3k+ "toy" I'm not worried about spending an extra $100 to get what's best nor am I worried about saving $50 bc of xyz.
Thank you in advance... I look forward to being part of the Hk family soon. I would appreciate any other thoughts, opinions, advice as well.