User Panel
I hate to be a party pooper but. I think your fine exchanging one approved brace for another approved brace. I'm thinking the cheek riser is problematic as someone might interpret it as intent to make a shoulder stock.
|
|
Quoted:
... I think your fine exchanging one approved brace for another approved brace. I'm thinking the cheek riser is problematic as someone might interpret it as intent to make a shoulder stock. View Quote The cheek riser's sole purpose is to give operators the option to elevate their LOS. It's not illegal to rest your cheek on a pistol brace. Resting your cheek on the brace creates another point of pistol stabilization, which should aid and/or enhance accuracy. Resting your cheek on a pistol brace does not convert said pistol brace to a stock. The ATF has ruled that it's not illegal to shoulder a pistol brace. This is my interpretation. I like beer. |
|
Quoted:
I hate to be a party pooper but. I think your fine exchanging one approved brace for another approved brace. I'm thinking the cheek riser is problematic as someone might interpret it as intent to make a shoulder stock. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I hate to be a party pooper but. I think your fine exchanging one approved brace for another approved brace. I'm thinking the cheek riser is problematic as someone might interpret it as intent to make a shoulder stock. If, however, the shooter/possessor takes affirmative steps to configure the device for use as a shoulder-stock...and then in fact shoots the firearm from the shoulder using the accessory as a shoulder stock, that person has objectively “redesigned” the firearm for the purposes of the NFA. As you said, CAA doesn't offer a cheek riser for the brace, there's probably a reason for that. Quoted:
Hello, shotar and Thank You for your input. Here's my take on the cheek riser. The cheek riser's sole purpose is to give operators the option to elevate their LOS. It's not illegal to rest your cheek on a pistol brace. Resting your cheek on the brace creates another point of pistol stabilization, which should aid and/or enhance accuracy. Resting your cheek on a pistol brace does not convert said pistol brace to a stock. The ATF has ruled that it's not illegal to shoulder a pistol brace. This is my interpretation. I like beer. It IS illegal to modify the brace to make it "more" of a shoulder stock. It's illegal to shoulder a brace if you've removed the strap (if it has one), I can't imagine the ATF would look kindly of adding things to facilitate using it when shouldered, especially when those things don't also have any reasonable use when using it as a brace. |
|
Cheek Rests designed, manufactured, marketed and sold specifically for use with pistol buffer tubes have been available for many, many years. The subject cheek rests do not convert a pistol buffer tube into a stock.
|
|
The 24 dollar question is what kind of accuracy do you get with it?
Red |
|
Quoted:
Cheek Rests designed, manufactured, marketed and sold specifically for use with pistol buffer tubes have been available for many, many years. The subject cheek rests do not convert a pistol buffer tube into a stock. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Cheek Rests designed, manufactured, marketed and sold specifically for use with pistol buffer tubes have been available for many, many years. The subject cheek rests do not convert a pistol buffer tube into a stock. View Quote You're obviously convinced you're right though so there's no point discussing it. Good luck if you ever have to prove it to the ATF. |
|
Quoted: That's nice but you're not adding a cheek riser to a buffer tube, you're modifying a brace which the ATF clearly says is a no-no. You're obviously convinced you're right though so there's no point discussing it. Good luck if you ever have to prove it to the ATF. View Quote Hypothetically, would wrapping a piece of foam (for to use as a cheek rest/riser) on the extended arm of the brace constitute a redesign of the brace, which would categorize it a Stock ..? Is this your interpretation? |
|
I'm disappointed that a thread on "Roni Mods" didn't include opening up the front.
It's absolutely stupid that they did not make this gizmo suppressor compatible. Quoted:
It's illegal to shoulder a brace if you've removed the strap (if it has one)... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm disappointed that a thread on "Roni Mods" didn't include opening up the front. It's absolutely stupid that they did not make this gizmo suppressor compatible. Is that true, or did you make it up? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I'm disappointed that a thread on "Roni Mods" didn't include opening up the front. It's absolutely stupid that they did not make this gizmo suppressor compatible. Quoted:
It's illegal to shoulder a brace if you've removed the strap (if it has one)... AzAgLover is correct. Removing the strap on a pistol brace that was designed with a strap, is a big no-no. |
|
|
I like it OP. Looks fantastic! Lets see it with the G19 inserted.
|
|
Quoted:
I like it OP. Looks fantastic! Lets see it with the G19 inserted. View Quote Going to a few shops today. Undecided if I should go with a Gen3 or 4. Leaning toward the Gen3. |
|
Quoted:
I'm disappointed that a thread on "Roni Mods" didn't include opening up the front. It's absolutely stupid that they did not make this gizmo suppressor compatible. Is that true, or did you make it up? View Quote |
|
View Quote Just made up nonsense by the same guys who were shouting "CHEEK THE BRACE!" down the firing line a couple years ago. |
|
|
Wow. So atf tried to pinch the guy for resting his cheek in the arm of the brace and also for having a angle grip on the pistol??
|
|
|
Quoted:
he modified the brace. View Quote He didn't modify the brace. Read it again. The brace itself was a modification. The government position was, "tell me his weapon is either a rifle with a short barrel or tell me his weapon is a pistol with a foregrip... then convict on either." Anyone can remove the strap from their brace if they want (not sure why they would want), and plenty of braces don't come with any velcro. Internet people tell this lie all the time. They also used to lie about braces that fold. Many, too, lied about braces that slide. It's the exact same group of fools that "would definitely spend $200 on a CLASS-3-LICENSE if it didn't give the ATF the special right to inspect your home without a warrant at any time..." Keep telling each other lies. I'll keep blazing. |
|
Quoted:
Cheek Rests designed, manufactured, marketed and sold specifically for use with pistol buffer tubes have been available for many, many years. The subject cheek rests do not convert a pistol buffer tube into a stock. View Quote But go right ahead. Put up your check book to prove the Govt wrong. IMO.. make no changes to braces and only use braces with approval letters and on specified firearms as listed from the manufacturer. They are looking for people pushing the envelope further into the grey areas.. Potentially loosing your firearms rights for the rest of your life and the $100k price tag is a hell of a way to poke the Bear ! Carry on. |
|
Quoted: No. He didn't modify the brace. Read it again. The brace itself was a modification. The government position was, "tell me his weapon is either a rifle with a short barrel or tell me his weapon is a pistol with a foregrip... then convict on either." Anyone can remove the strap from their brace if they want (not sure why they would want), and plenty of braces don't come with any velcro. Internet people tell this lie all the time. They also used to lie about braces that fold. Many, too, lied about braces that slide. It's the exact same group of fools that "would definitely spend $200 on a CLASS-3-LICENSE if it didn't give the ATF the special right to inspect your home without a warrant at any time..." Keep telling each other lies. I'll keep blazing. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
My understanding of it was the addition of the rubber pad at the end of the brace that caused the problem..... View Quote I try to keep track of the liars... and the same ones keep popping up. It's almost like they're trying to promote a climate of fear... scaring people into not exercising their rights... Curious... QUITE CURIOUS, INDEED! "...the primary issue in dispute at trial will be whether or not Kelland Wright’s firearm meets the definition of a “rifle,” that is a firearm designed to be fired from the shoulder, see 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a). Part of this issue will center on the implications modifications that Kelland Wright made or had made to the firearm, including the addition of an extension piece to the rear of the firearm." The brace is the "extension piece" referenced. |
|
Quoted: Can you post a source for where you got that? I try to keep track of the liars... and the same ones keep popping up. It's almost like they're trying to promote a climate of fear... scaring people into not exercising their rights... Curious... QUITE CURIOUS, INDEED! "...the primary issue in dispute at trial will be whether or not Kelland Wright’s firearm meets the definition of a “rifle,” that is a firearm designed to be fired from the shoulder, see 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a). Part of this issue will center on the implications modifications that Kelland Wright made or had made to the firearm, including the addition of an extension piece to the rear of the firearm." The brace is the "extension piece" referenced. View Quote Vasquez Expert Report Attached File Just to be clear....I don't agree with the ATF's position on this at all! |
|
|
Quoted:
There was a picture of the gun in the big GD thread and it's referenced in the "Vasquez Expert Report" that Nolo posted a link to. The guy added a rubber cane tip to the end of the buffer tube....he claimed it was for keeping his gun setting straight in the safe, the ATF said it was to make the brace act like a stock. Vasquez Expert Report https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/123552/maximpdw_PNG-721064.png Just to be clear....I don't agree with the ATF's position on this at all! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I'm disappointed that a thread on "Roni Mods" didn't include opening up the front. It's absolutely stupid that they did not make this gizmo suppressor compatible. Is that true, or did you make it up? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
There was a picture of the gun in the big GD thread and it's referenced in the "Vasquez Expert Report" that Nolo posted a link to. The guy added a rubber cane tip to the end of the buffer tube....he claimed it was for keeping his gun setting straight in the safe, the ATF said it was to make the brace act like a stock. Vasquez Expert Report https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/123552/maximpdw_PNG-721064.png Just to be clear....I don't agree with the ATF's position on this at all! View Quote ROCK6 |
|
Quoted:
It really doesn't matter what you do along the supposedly gray-lines of legality...if they want to indict you they will and they have the power to withhold info, hid info, lie, trap, and ignore factual information. ROCK6 View Quote There is no legal-gray-area with regards to removing the velcro or adding a rubber plug. It's all just fine. The merchants of lies within our own community are logged on here pumping made up nonsense to promote a climate of terror among the citizens. It's a play designed to deter you from exercising your rights. Don't let them win, and don't hesitate to call them what they are- liars. The reality is not "Remove the velcro? Whoa, buddy... is that worth a trip to jail plus many thousands?" it's "Go through the door to capture and detain... a plug-placer? Hey boss, is that really worth the risk?" |
|
Well the gun show is finally in town so I’m headed there with the hope to find a nib Gen3/G19. If I’m SOL, I’ll look for a Gen4. They should be in abundance. Afterwards, straight to the indoor range.
Expect a report with photos later this evening.. |
|
|
Quoted:
Mission accomplished. I found and bought what was the only Gen3/G19 left in the entire building. I also picked up a box of cheap Blazer ammo. From the show I drove straight to the range and after dialing in the red dot I shot the following groups. I had absolutely no issues at the range. The G19 performed flawlessly with the micro Roni. I was extremely impressed with the soft recoil. There was virtually no muzzle flip. The first photo shows the target with a 10 shot group. The second photo with the same target showing a 20 shot grouping. The third photo with a 30 shot grouping. The target was placed at a distance of about 50ft. http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los3088/RONI/F2F8E6D9-238A-40AC-AE93-04EE7BCDA863_zpsm86oysrb.jpg http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los3088/RONI/E5327481-35CF-4F09-A373-50EC7AA0A63F_zpscvwxo7ar.jpg http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los3088/RONI/177599AC-BC21-4752-9487-296B5A6A11A8_zpshqr8xq7j.jpg So far I'm very impressed with the Micro Roni and very happy with my purchase and results. View Quote Looks like a serious accuracy upgrade |
|
@LOS .. Does the zero change when your pistol has been removed and reinstalled? Guess I better get out from under the rock
I've been living under because I haven't seen anything like that before. |
|
Quoted:
@LOS .. Does the zero change when your pistol has been removed and reinstalled? Guess I better get out from under the rock I've been living under because I haven't seen anything like that before. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Thank you. The Roni really brings out the best of my 19. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
nice shooting! Looks like a serious accuracy upgrade You guys are going to make me get a 17 just for the Roni. And I'm increasingly ok with that. |
|
|
Quoted:
Go for it. I can only imagine the accuracy you'll get from the longer barrel. You won't be disappointed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: ... You guys are going to make me get a 17 just for the Roni. And I'm increasingly ok with that. Also the Roni is illegal in CA because it's a "barrel shroud" and turns the Glock into an "assault pistol" but that won't be an issue anymore in a few months |
|
Quoted:
Gotta save up more money, being all responsible and shit Also the Roni is illegal in CA because it's a "barrel shroud" and turns the Glock into an "assault pistol" but that won't be an issue anymore in a few months View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: ... You guys are going to make me get a 17 just for the Roni. And I'm increasingly ok with that. Also the Roni is illegal in CA because it's a "barrel shroud" and turns the Glock into an "assault pistol" but that won't be an issue anymore in a few months |
|
OP Great Work! I kind of liked the RONI but not the braced one they offer, Yours looks soo much better!!!!
Now I may want one -but I have a question Do RONIs work with Polymer 80 framed 19/23 builds? Mine is a stock Glock 23 parts kit on a P80 frame - Any reason why the RONI won't work? Again great work - much improved over factory! |
|
Quoted:
OP Great Work! I kind of liked the RONI but not the braced one they offer, Yours looks soo much better!!!! Now I may want one -but I have a question Do RONIs work with Polymer 80 framed 19/23 builds? Mine is a stock Glock 23 parts kit on a P80 frame - Any reason why the RONI won't work? Again great work - much improved over factory! View Quote |
|
So I'm pondering the idea of Cerakoting the little sumbish....
|
|
I have a bunch of 33 rounders that this would be perfect for.
|
|
OP, instead of building up the brace so you have a better cheekweld, why not just lower the optic?
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.