User Panel
I have an early STG556 and it's been 100% reliable. The optic is clear and holds zero, the rifle eats everything, fit and finish are above average.
|
|
I broke an extractor due to using a bad AUG mag. Replaced the extractor and got a Ratworx hybrid bolt. No problems since.
|
|
I don’t think the stg 556s had as many issues as the e4s. I had one that ran well and was fun. I do remember that some had issues where MSAR had to do a horrifically ugly grind job on parts of the receiver to get some guns to run right. Besides that big issues I recall were the integrated optics had a high failure rate to the point MSAR gave up on them and stopped offering that as an option or replacing them if they failed. Their awful ar15 pattern mags that just didn’t work (not applicable to the stg556 variants that used aug pattern mags) that they sold knowing they didn’t work then pulled shit claiming they would exchange them for pmags then did their damdest to not actually do that, oh and the e4 models mag catch failing and locking magazines in place which they did a voluntary recall on.
At this point if one has a issue from the factory and not just a broken part where a replacement can be found easily (which is probably an increasingly small list of parts given most of it was proprietary and not Steyer compatible) it’s probably a better idea to dump the thing then chase good money after bad. |
|
I've reaquired one I had but never fired, the friend who got it said he couldn't get brass cases to even chamber by dropping the charging handle. He could push a round in with his finger , drop the bolt and it would fire, then not close all the way on the next round. But it ran like a striped ass ape with steel cased ammo. I'm looking at it as a winter project/ challenge to get it to run with brass cased ammo. But, if it runs well with steel cased stuff, well, at least thats cheaper, ya?
|
|
I have one and my brother in law has one. No problems with either one.
|
|
MSAR didn't share any info, nor would most companies reveal internal policies on information on failure rates, issues etc. Most of what is known is gleaned from real world experience, and in a few cases information shared by former MSAR employees.
The MSAR guns had a variety of issues, mostly related to quality control. The plated bolts were known to sometimes have lugs fail, there were some guns with issues of the face of the receiver not being machined quite right, some scopes had the detents give out and wouldn't hold zero, and extractors and exrtactor springs were probably the most common failure point. The E4 ar-15 mag stocks were known to have the plastic mag catch bind up, a stainless steel replacement was offered but no more are avaialble. THe molded threaded inserts on the E4 stock were known to occasionally spin in their mounting making it a paint to remove a screw in piece of picaitnny rail. The MSAR made AR mags are very poor in reliability, make sure you skip those. MSAR had a tendency to try/experiment with new materials, coatings, heat treat, etc, etc- that is one of the reasons some bolts failed. The real issue is near the end of the line for them, a lot of guns were assembled with whatever was available, or as one former employee put it "floor sweepings" to just get guns out to make money. There really isn't a serial number range to break any of this down, it seems their QC/QA was all over the place- when they exploded in popularity they had to bring a lot more people on very quickly and it appears that some of the guns during that time also suffered more issues from lack of testing/employee training on what to look for. The main issue is there really isn't an easy way to tell what gun has issues and what gun doesn't. I have an early MSAR that had the extractor go bad which caused feeding issues, but after that was replaced under warranty it ran just fine. I had another MSAR (that I eventually sold) that ran 100% from day one. One thing to make sure is that you use MSAR mags in MSAR's, and AUG Mags in AUGs, and don't try to cross use them. If you do, about 80% of the time things will run just fine, but about 20% of the time you may have feeding issues. This is based on years and years of people trying it. The mags look the same, but the MSAR mags are essentially reverse engineered mags and don't have exactly the same geometry based on some of the issues people have experienced with rounds not feeding right in some AUGs. Sven Manticore Arms |
|
Sven, thanks. Have you heard of one that flat refused to shoot brass, but ran well with steel cased ammo?
|
|
Quoted:
The MSAR guns had a variety of issues, mostly related to quality control. The plated bolts were known to sometimes have lugs fail, there were some guns with issues of the face of the receiver not being machined quite right, some scopes had the detents give out and wouldn't hold zero, and extractors and exrtactor springs were probably the most common failure point. The E4 ar-15 mag stocks were known to have the plastic mag catch bind up, a stainless steel replacement was offered but no more are avaialble. THe molded threaded inserts on the E4 stock were known to occasionally spin in their mounting making it a paint to remove a screw in piece of picaitnny rail. The MSAR made AR mags are very poor in reliability, make sure you skip those. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
The MSAR guns had a variety of issues, mostly related to quality control. The plated bolts were known to sometimes have lugs fail, there were some guns with issues of the face of the receiver not being machined quite right, some scopes had the detents give out and wouldn't hold zero, and extractors and exrtactor springs were probably the most common failure point. The E4 ar-15 mag stocks were known to have the plastic mag catch bind up, a stainless steel replacement was offered but no more are avaialble. THe molded threaded inserts on the E4 stock were known to occasionally spin in their mounting making it a paint to remove a screw in piece of picaitnny rail. The MSAR made AR mags are very poor in reliability, make sure you skip those. And as someone who had a rather, um, personal involvement with the AR mags I'll comment thusly: Unless you know the vintage, you'd be better off either burning your money or buying some crappy Promags. If you know the production is from right before MSAR started their death gasps and died for good, then *those* mags are good to go. I have...quite a few...and all of them are rock solid. Quoted:
MSAR had a tendency to try/experiment with new materials, coatings, heat treat, etc, etc- that is one of the reasons some bolts failed. The real issue is near the end of the line for them, a lot of guns were assembled with whatever was available, or as one former employee put it "floor sweepings" to just get guns out to make money. There really isn't a serial number range to break any of this down, it seems their QC/QA was all over the place- when they exploded in popularity they had to bring a lot more people on very quickly and it appears that some of the guns during that time also suffered more issues from lack of testing/employee training on what to look for. MSAR could have been a great company and owned the bullpup market but the greed and absolute shortsightedness of the owners coupled with a CS department that (and this is just my personal opinion with seven years downrange reflection) bought off customers with boxes of goodies to calm the waters. IMO, that enabled the owners/management to keep on keeping on without ever really solving issues. Was the CS department operating "under orders" or was it just their attempt to limit bad press? I dunno. I do know that I use my experience with MSAR as "a clue" when dealing with other companies; when they ply you with product as a "workaround" because what you actually spent money on isn't working, and then the company offers "solutions" that are really too good to be true, then it's time to walk away and sever contact. |
|
I wish there was a way to ID from my E4 serial number, when it was made and what may be a potential deficiency from that timeframe, that I can try to remedy prior to an issue poping up.
|
|
It sucks for those that got them back in the day, but there’s really no excuse for those that bought them recently. Especially with a fantastic alternative readily available, which it’s based on in the first place.
|
|
I have an MSAR with both stocks(STG & AR; STG has the square bolt)and both run great. The original owner got 3000 + out of it.
My only issue has been extractors but the Rats have been good at keeping those available. I bought it just after Pete released the CQC models and I wanted to make sure I liked the platform. It doesn't get out much though. |
|
|
Quoted:
Like telling a VW kinda guy to stick to BMW......sometimes you have to make allowances .... ?? I have about a grand in a late ( NATO serial number, caliber marked 223/6.8) tan stg , box and papers, with 8 30s one 42 rd mag, single point sling setup, and a lucid hd7 red dot. I don't feel like I got hurt, and like I said, it's my winter project to see if I can get it running with brass cases ammo, cause it already runs fine with steel for some reason. View Quote Well if you end up on the side of the road with your VW and can't find spare parts, just don't be surprised when the BMW guys said "sorry man, but we warned you" That actually is a pretty good price especially withthe optic included. What kind of issues do you get with the bras cased ammo? Have you tried different brands of brass cased ammo, and have you set it to the "adverse" gas setting to see what happens? Sven Manticore Arms |
|
Sven, just got it back, previous owner ( a friend) was first person to fire it. He said he'd drop the bolt on a brass round and it wouldn't chamber all the way, or occasionally push the bullet back in the case, with brass, but ran great with steel. It's favourite evidently is the zinc plated steel.
Tried with all eight 30 rd mags, and the 42. Unfortunately, nearest range is 30 miles away...the one ten minutes away burned down last year. I'm full time sitter for an autistic 28 year old, so it takes planning to arrange the time to go to the range..... Oh, and, your opinion on pmag aug mags? In the stg, anyway...... |
|
Quoted:
I have an early STG556 and it's been 100% reliable. The optic is clear and holds zero, the rifle eats everything, fit and finish are above average. View Quote |
|
Damn! ?? This is turning into a testimonial post.....
After all your reports of good to go rifles, I'm starting to wonder if I just getting visits from Murphy every once in a while......... Ain't nobody can report, mine did this, I sent it in, it came back fixed and they said they did.........? |
|
Quoted:
I wish there was a way to ID from my E4 serial number, when it was made and what may be a potential deficiency from that timeframe, that I can try to remedy prior to an issue poping up. View Quote One way was on how the seam was formed in the stock. I used that to know that mine was a late model that was good. There were two or three other things but I can't remember. You might start another thread to ask. As for reliability, mine has never seen brass cased ammo and has been 100% except that one time I used MSAR mags. |
|
Kfeltenberger, can you amplify on how greed and shortsightedness scuttled MSAR? In what ways? What did they do as opposed to what you think they should have done?
|
|
My stg556 factory optic lost zero & the ability to adjust crosshair. No ability to repair or replace optic - “warranty” solution was to offer top rail... already had the rail as my rifle was the railed model & I bought the $$ optic.
Bolt was deforming/peening the trunion - “warranty” solution to that was also unacceptable. This was all while they were still in officially in business & before their problems/move/restructuring/bankruptcy/flight. |
|
I was at the range shooting, with my factory Msar mags then decided I would try out some new factory US made Steyr AUG mags I got for like $5 each. Basically they were off spec., the trajectory of the feed lips. I have “dummy” rounds made up so I can check stuff... it was readily apparent looking into the ejection port and moving the bolt carrier slowly forward. I put in the factory Msar mag, bullet trajectory was correct and loaded. The AUG mags were pointing the bullet “nose down” as the bolt carrier moved forward loading a round. The bullet would slam into the base at the bottom of the feed ramp causing the bullet back into the casing or double feeding. Broke the extractor claw the entire length and slightly. Almost like it had been ground down, you could see the fracture with a good light and magnifying glass. I didn’t even notice it till I took it out and compared it to a photo online. I did wonder about the weak mag spring thing allowing the round to sink and thought about swapping them out with a stronger AR mag spring. But since the $25 total expenditure for 5 AUG mags was not a big deal, I put them back in the closet and decided not to play with them to work. Luckily, I got a new extractor and it works fine and put that bolt away as a spare, and got a Ratworx hybrid bolt that uses ar15 parts and use it instead. The rifle has been entirely trouble free except for that, and shoots great. Lately I’ve been thinking about the AUGa3m1 16” barrel with the stg.77 skinny scope and parting out the Msar which could probably cover most of it.... It just seems wrong tearing apart a perfectly good gun but getting parts are a problem. The AUG wasn’t an option years ago when I got the Msar.
|
|
Quoted:
Kfeltenberger, can you amplify on how greed and shortsightedness scuttled MSAR? In what ways? What did they do as opposed to what you think they should have done? View Quote Oh they also loved doing limited edition runs like they did in the knife world instead of diversifying their product line while advertising new vapor ware. Oooh this ones all green and has a Austrian flower on the side and a knife and case that will be an extra grand please. The one that comes to mind most was the PCC that took glock mags. It was hyped to the point places were doing pre orders then years latter it came out that the thing never progressed past a 3D printed mock up that MSAR was taking around to drum up hype. Another example the promised caliber conversions. Those only became available when they started selling everything they had and the low numbers sold points to them probably never getting past the testing phase. All of this was a long time ago so I could be remembering wrong. |
|
Machine guns and cars....what a fuck.
Are these the same people involved in microtech knives? |
|
|
A friend has one of their knives- which is very nice- and had just about convinced me to get
one.......not now. |
|
Quoted:
The owner bought transferable mgs and sports cars while apparently not paying suppliers or upgrading equipment to raise QC. I recall a employee saying they polished bores with a hand drill and no fixture or something along those lines for instance. There were a crapload of transferable mgs sold by them when it all finally started falling apart if I recall correctly. Oh they also loved doing limited edition runs like they did in the knife world instead of diversifying their product line while advertising new vapor ware. Oooh this ones all green and has a Austrian flower on the side and a knife and case that will be an extra grand please. The one that comes to mind most was the PCC that took glock mags. It was hyped to the point places were doing pre orders then years latter it came out that the thing never progressed past a 3D printed mock up that MSAR was taking around to drum up hype. Another example the promised caliber conversions. Those only became available when they started selling everything they had and the low numbers sold points to them probably never getting past the testing phase. All of this was a long time ago so I could be remembering wrong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Kfeltenberger, can you amplify on how greed and shortsightedness scuttled MSAR? In what ways? What did they do as opposed to what you think they should have done? Oh they also loved doing limited edition runs like they did in the knife world instead of diversifying their product line while advertising new vapor ware. Oooh this ones all green and has a Austrian flower on the side and a knife and case that will be an extra grand please. The one that comes to mind most was the PCC that took glock mags. It was hyped to the point places were doing pre orders then years latter it came out that the thing never progressed past a 3D printed mock up that MSAR was taking around to drum up hype. Another example the promised caliber conversions. Those only became available when they started selling everything they had and the low numbers sold points to them probably never getting past the testing phase. All of this was a long time ago so I could be remembering wrong. Beyond that, a lot of promises were made that were kept in name only. Conversion kits were promised for 6.8SPC, 7.62x39mm, and 5.45x39mm, and while complete guns were released, only a handful (if that) of the kits were released, and many of them had function issues. MSAR was positioned to *own* the bullpup market but they got greedy and instead following basic long term growth practices, management acted like a bunch of hood rats who just sold a couple kilos of coke. I'm surprised that we never heard of a cheetah with a diamond encrusted collar being involved somewhere along the line. When they produced a rifle that worked, it ran like a sewing machine. Then they siphoned off cash and didn't think any further ahead than the next sale, and it went to hell in a handbasket. With what they announced and teased, had they followed through I think they'd still be around and a major player in the bullpup market. |
|
Quoted:
That's pretty much how I remember it. Another thing they hyped was the "Archangel", a subcompact 9mm pistol that (to me from the few pics I saw) looked smaller than Shield/G-43/LC9s. Beyond that, a lot of promises were made that were kept in name only. Conversion kits were promised for 6.8SPC, 7.62x39mm, and 5.45x39mm, and while complete guns were released, only a handful (if that) of the kits were released, and many of them had function issues. MSAR was positioned to *own* the bullpup market but they got greedy and instead following basic long term growth practices, management acted like a bunch of hood rats who just sold a couple kilos of coke. I'm surprised that we never heard of a cheetah with a diamond encrusted collar being involved somewhere along the line. When they produced a rifle that worked, it ran like a sewing machine. Then they siphoned off cash and didn't think any further ahead than the next sale, and it went to hell in a handbasket. With what they announced and teased, had they followed through I think they'd still be around and a major player in the bullpup market. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kfeltenberger, can you amplify on how greed and shortsightedness scuttled MSAR? In what ways? What did they do as opposed to what you think they should have done? Oh they also loved doing limited edition runs like they did in the knife world instead of diversifying their product line while advertising new vapor ware. Oooh this ones all green and has a Austrian flower on the side and a knife and case that will be an extra grand please. The one that comes to mind most was the PCC that took glock mags. It was hyped to the point places were doing pre orders then years latter it came out that the thing never progressed past a 3D printed mock up that MSAR was taking around to drum up hype. Another example the promised caliber conversions. Those only became available when they started selling everything they had and the low numbers sold points to them probably never getting past the testing phase. All of this was a long time ago so I could be remembering wrong. Beyond that, a lot of promises were made that were kept in name only. Conversion kits were promised for 6.8SPC, 7.62x39mm, and 5.45x39mm, and while complete guns were released, only a handful (if that) of the kits were released, and many of them had function issues. MSAR was positioned to *own* the bullpup market but they got greedy and instead following basic long term growth practices, management acted like a bunch of hood rats who just sold a couple kilos of coke. I'm surprised that we never heard of a cheetah with a diamond encrusted collar being involved somewhere along the line. When they produced a rifle that worked, it ran like a sewing machine. Then they siphoned off cash and didn't think any further ahead than the next sale, and it went to hell in a handbasket. With what they announced and teased, had they followed through I think they'd still be around and a major player in the bullpup market. |
|
Steyr pretty much stopped bringing in stuff after the 1989awb. Up till then, they only needed to bring in semiauto guns. They had a few “stragglers” after that. Like the USR, a “sporting rifle” to get around the 922R compliance, which wasn’t popular because Americans don’t like stupid looking politician designed guns. We like the real deal!!! They really screwed the US gun owners, along with HK, with zero support or parts for 20+ years. If it wasn’t for Pete Athens, a great guy thankfully, AUG owners would of had no parts and expensive green paperweights. It’s too bad MSAR decided to run their business like the Cocaine Cowboys in Miami because they had a good concept/product. If I had a choice at the time I would have bought a 16 inch, slick scope AUG like I had in the 80’s for like an hour (don’t ask... stupid move), instead of the MSAR. But growing up in the 80’s and remembering the prices I paid then, LOL, I wasn’t going to pay that kind of money for a pre-ban. I got an MSAR and except for a broken extractor it’s been good. If I decided to sell it parted out, I could easily get my money out of it towards an actual AUG, in the actual configuration I want... not all that rail on the scope stuff, which actual parts are available for. Unlike my FN FNC. Just give me the plain scope “donut of death” AUG from Die Hard with a 16” barrel or the black US Customs AUG. LOL
|
|
You say, when they produced a rifle that worked it ran like a sewing machine.......can you give a horseback guess of an estimate of the percentage that fit that description?
|
|
Quoted:
You say, when they produced a rifle that worked it ran like a sewing machine.......can you give a horseback guess of an estimate of the percentage that fit that description? View Quote |
|
No way to tell, but as I said, it appears to be gen 4(?), Nato-00XX sn, marked caliber 223/6.8
What era would that be placed in ? |
|
Quoted:
No way to tell, but as I said, it appears to be gen 4(?), Nato-00XX sn, marked caliber 223/6.8 What era would that be placed in ? View Quote |
|
rut row...........but like I said, it evidently runs like a top with steel cased ammo, which is cheaper anyway, so what the heck. Still, I'm gonna see if we can get it squared away with brass too....
|
|
I've been told that steel cases are ever so slightly smaller dimensionally because of the characteristics of steel Vs brass, don't know if true, but I wonder if that could make a difference. And I think if it turns out I can only use steel, I need to get one of the Rat Worx hybrid bolts. Who knows, maybe that would cause it to work with brass....stranger things have happened, ya?
|
|
kfeltenberger, would an MSAR with the forward assist be one of the "good guns"?
Mine has the forward assist and the only issue has been extractor failure. I think I bought one of the AR bolts for it though. Thanks |
|
Forward assist means it’s the first generation of guns they made. I don’t think they did those too long but it won’t have the stuck mag catch problem at least since those were the E4s made years latter. I also don’t think they were playing with changing with surface treatments and nitriding on bolts and things at that time which lead to cracked bolts from bad heat treat. If it has the AUG style optic those were always fragile to the point they stopped even offering it as an option or replacing broken ones years before they closed down. Even if it’s from a time when they didn’t have major problems doesn’t mean the gun is good though. MSAR used to wow people by giving them lots of swag when guns came in for repair which probably lowered the amount of complaints online quite a bit. Their QC was always bad in my opinion it just got worse over time and then CS went downhill too, the free goodies to engender good will after a repair disappeared and their name went to shit. Well that and all the other crap they were doing.
|
|
I had one.
Finally rid myself of it when she wouldn't fire even after replacing the broken firing pin. Now looking at a real aug which I should've done in the first place. |
|
I have two MSAR rifles. They have zero Malfunctions! I think a few rifles had major problems but most rifles ran 100%. My buddy did have one that broke an extractor but after that one issue it ran fine... And that batch had a manufacturing issue with the extractors. It was the second run I think.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.