Let me start by saying that I'm fairly new to the AUG scene. I've not owned one until recently but I have spent a decent amount of time on a dept. owned select-fire rifle. I enjoyed shooting the full-auto but never really seriously considered buying an AUG due to price.
As we all know, prices on much of the "assault rifle" market have come down dramatically in the last few months and I managed to trade off an old Colt Sporter Lightweight for a used AUG A1. Of course I had to fork out some $$$ but I think I came out okay. I have been shooting my pre-ban AUG (Honeymoon cruise, so to speak) and decided it was too nice a gun to really shoot the crap out of.
With all the above in mind, I started looking for a deal on a new E4. I like the AUG magazines but I've already got a couple boxes of M16 magazines so the choice of the E4 seemed like a logical one. I started keeping an eye on gunbroker.com and recently won an auction for a green MSAR with the AUG-alike 1.5x optic.
My dealer called this afternoon to tell me the Microtech had arrived and I picked the new rifle up after work. My initial reaction was kind of, "Yuck!" The cast parts (receiver, bolt carrier, gas block) are not as nice as the parts of my original Steyr. The textured surface on the MSAR stock is different and it does have some kind of sharp parts. I see what some say about the barrel takedown latch. But the MSAR latch is metal and the Steyr part is plastic. Also, I don't care for the way the MSAR cocking handle folds up flat against the receiver. It's hard to flip it up into the notch in the receiver and lock the bolt back. This is another point mentioned by many owners so I'm not alone in this.
Now that I've got the rifle home and have had a chance to field strip it and play with it a little, it has grown on me. The actual machined parts (gas parts, bolt, extractor, etc.) are very nice and look as nice as the real deal. From my initial playing, it looks like bolts and many other parts will interchange but not all of them. Some look like they could easily be fit by a good AUG gunsmith and others are too different. An example is the barrel. The MSAR barrel will fit on my AUG but not the other way around. The gas blocks are located in a slightly different spot. Also, the tips on the MSAR thrust pieces are a little bigger than the real deal and this keeps the MSAR bolt carrier from seating into the A1 cocking handle. Maybe the later Steyr guns were this way too?
The stocks will interchange. I took the US stock and put it on my Steyr and everything lined up and went together properly. I didn't test fire it, of course, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. The MSAR receiver fit very tightly into the Austrian stock but it did fit. Unfortunately the stock latch was very tight once latched and I had to tap the latch over to get the receiver out of the stock. I dinged my stock latch just a little. Nobody will ever notice but me, I guess.
Mags in the US rifle don't drop free. I guess that's not a serious deal but I liked the "speed reload" on the AUG. I'm sure I'll figure an alternative out.
Overall, it seems like a decent representation of an old classic. I'd say it's like comparing a Colt to a Springfield––maybe a Llama?––in that they are more similar than dissimilar. If it shoots and functions well, it should be a keeper.
Don't tell my wife but I think I'll need a TPD and a new A3. Will it ever end???
PS––range report and pics soon.