Quote History Originally Posted By GPSIG:
Burst marked and A1 forging...I think that is pretty much the least desirable A2 option out there and I would value it the same -- for the purpose of shooting -- as an A1 or even a 614 which would both be exactly the same dimensionally. There is something to be said for nice condition and everyone likes an A2 marking, but I think that "over 40k" valuation is optimistic. I also think offering it as unfired along with an upper that has a chrome bolt carrier and wear on the ejection port cover is bound to invite some questions. And maybe it is just me, but isn't the buffer tube castle nut on backwards and the backplate is a replacement setup for a sling attachment? For that money I would buy a clean A1 and enjoy some savings.
View Quote
Totally agree with the "least desirable" of the A2 configurations. But I think the chrome carrier is actually just the standard light parkerized one and that it's the lighting that is making it look shiny. And the wear on the ejection port cover appears to be a white lithium grease, not wear. And the guy has spread it everywhere. You can see remnants of it in a lot of the nooks and crannies in various areas of the gun
I would say, considering the lack of brass kisses on the lefty bump, that it probably hasn't been fired much but the gas tube, where it goes into the carrier key looks a little too discolored to be "unfired".
And you are correct about the castle nut and the sling swivel plate being not correct.
Most carbines (if they came from Colt configured as a carbine) had "auto" marked lowers, not "burst" markings. And where are the factory Colt assembly proof marks that should be stamped ahead of the ejection port?
If I were a betting man, I'd guess that rifle came from Colt in rifle configuration and was turned into a carbine later. Only a look at the form 4 (or a colt letter) will tell the truth of it.