User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:17:33 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that OPS and KAC hold themselves to a higher regard and I haven't seen either pull any crap like AAC. That IMHO makes them superior. BY FAR. -X HUGE +1 to this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:20:37 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I wouldn't agree that AAC makes a superior can. There are others out there that make just as good and better cans than AAC does. Please Explane'....Tell us more about these other cans.  How about OPS and KAC just for starters, or did the armchair commandos say that those aren't worth a shit? Real world operators use both for their intended purpose on a daily basis and have zero issues with them. Maybe that doesn't count when you stake your life on your equipment? Is it different when the paper can't shoot back?  I own both AAC and Ops Inc. suppresors...& think highly KAC's cans But you forgot to answer the Q'....What makes them supperior over the AAC ? Stop acting like your somebody that you really are not... 
What makes AAC superior to them if you want to play games? When I made my post I was not just talking about 5.56 cans. OPS cans have a stellar reputation for repeatable accuracy and have good suppression levels. KAC cans are built like brick shithouses. Their 5.56 cans are louder than some, but that is because they have huge bores compared to others. If they had tighter bores they would be comparable to others in sound reduction. Their other caliber cans are top notch. Neither of the above mentioned companies partake in this name calling BS, so that right there makes them better in my book. They are humble and don't have a big head on their shoulders. What am I acting like that I am not? I am what I am and don't claim to be anything more. You have no clue who I am, as I have no clue who you are. Are you just mad because you are an AAC kool-aid drinker and I offended your buddies?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:24:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Click here to see ––-> "AAC sued for false advertising Ironically and technically, that's the same as lying.
Now, off to the legal section ...  how is being sued the same as lying? Surefire will throw a lot of money at it, but crying about this ad is stupid, I guess if I parked a muddy/dirty dodge with a flat tire next to a new chevy and said the chevy was better I would be false advertising.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:29:11 PM EDT
[#4]
I predict Surefire will lose.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:40:00 PM EDT
[#5]
I bet Pentagon did, too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 10:44:36 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Surefire is suing some kid for running his mouth on the internet?
Well . . . . it looks as if Surefire is stepping onto the same train that Mr. Larue criticised AAC for riding. Link please? All Aboard . . . . the suppression by litigation train is boarding on platform 1 for immediate departure to lawyerland! I think Surefire is a company that simply doesn't want to tolerate anyone running their name through the mud. It has more to do with a company reputation than silencers IMO. The KAC M4QD is loud because of a requirement for it to run 210 rounds in 3 minutes. The bullets begin to be marginally stable around 120 and the bore needs to be ~.290" to pass the marginally stable bullets. The large bore creates a situation where it is harder to make the silencer efficiently reduce the sound. Loud cans will also have more flash than quieter ones most of the time. The surefire silencers may be an exception as they have an internal patent pending device that is supposed to reduce flash. Different parts of the military are looking for different things for different applications, the M4QD was a general idiot proof silencer for the troops. The Ops 12th model was procured as a signature reduction device for skilled operators using precision weapons, similar to the application for the silencer on the 110 SASS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/30/2008 11:27:35 PM EDT
[#7]
When it was brand new ^ 
taken just the other day 
The can in the advertisement is clearly a surefire. And yes, they are awesome. Not as quiet as the M42000, but to my hands it feels lighter, and with the back over the barrel design it throws the balance off less. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2008 4:26:29 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
While AAC tried to keep it "even" in that picture, to anyone who spends enough time reading/looking at silencers (no offense to anyone who didn't know) the spot welds at the end of the end cap are VERY similar to Surefire cans.. I understand how most people that are REALLY into it may notice. But I'd think those people already know that surefire uses substandard construction techniques. people "already in the know" think very highly of the surefire product. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/31/2008 5:41:40 AM EDT
[#9]
Non Technical
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
