I recently bought an unfired M96 Carbine from a friend, and we had fun taking the gun to the range for its "break-in procedure."
He has also introduced me to several other M96 owners, so it was inevitible that I would ask one of them why they preferred the M96 over the AR15. (The only *compaint* I have about the M96 BTW is that it is heavy. I will have to get the "Recon Kit" eventually, just to cut down on weight.) Anyway one of the M96 owners said the primary advantage of the M96 over the AR is its gas system. The M96 uses an "operating arm" that is pushed back by the gas from the ignition of the round... this "operating arm" then pushes the bolt carrier back, etc.
The AR, he said, has a "dirty" system whereby the bolt assembly is directly connected to the gas tube, which lets residue from the burning powder come back into the upper receiver, thus dirtying it up faster.
While it is true that the AR's bolt assembly reacts directly from the gas, I haven't heard of or experienced any extreme fouling in AR's due to this design. What do you guys think? It *does* seem, in theory, that the operating rod arrangement would be better, but I am an AR fanatic... and although I like the M69, it will never be my favorite... my AR's are.
Thanks,
ARnSC