Quoted: How about a 10/22 with some subsonic rounds? That is in your price range.
Max |
Even with subsonic, would still be louder than a pellet gun. He'd need to get a 10/22 with a can, and that would be out of his price range.
With pellet guns, caliber is less important than some may think. I've killed plenty of squirrels and pigeons with my .177. It will do the job as long as your shot placement is good.
.177 has more penetration than .22, while .22 typically makes a larger permanent cavity. Either will do the job - but the pellet still has to be placed accurately.
Believe it or not, lead target wadcutters typically make more severe wounds than dedicated hunting ammo in pellet guns. But for what we're talking about, any pellet (not BB) will do the job effectively.
If you're stuck with pointed or round-nosed lead hunting pellets, loading them backwards will give more expansion - at the expense of penetration. I've had backwards-loaded pellets expand to almost .30 caliber when loaded in this way.
My pellet gun is a $60 Crosman M66 with a 3-9x32 Daisy (Winchester marked) scope in .177 caliber - velocity is about 645 fps with pellets. It will typically penetrate one milk jug and dent the second one pretty bad (regardless of ammo type), which would equate to about 3 inches in flesh.
A .22 pellet gun will easily do the same thing, if not more. At short ranges, the higher-powered .22 guns are every bit as effective as .22 rimfire.