Quoted:
Quoted: He wants a very specific 700, that Remington doesn't make. I offered an alternative.
|
Um actually you offered a good way to get blown into a million bloody pieces [so what I exaggerate].
|
Try some experimentation when you get the chance. The 220s I loaded up in my .308 (non-compressed loads, mind you), hung with my friend's 220gr .30-06 loads, right out to 600 yards (our maximum distance). The .30-06 load has a little more energy behind it, but the .308 load was just as accurate. I stand by my original statement. The .308 will do anything the .30-06 will, and will accommodate the same bullets.
WaMag's original statement was..."I want the looks of the Remington 700 vs, however it only comes in 308 and I want a 30-06
more ammo choices. how hard is it to get the barrel redone to 30-06 or find a replacement for this rifle?" I can prove this wrong, and have. The
only thing the .30-06 has over the .308, is more energy at extended ranges. It's just as accurate. And in case nobody has looked lately, .30-06 ammo is
more expensive than .308.
I have no problem with WaMag getting a .30-06. I have one, and I love it. But to make a sweeping statement like the .30-06 has more ammo choices is wrong, and he needs to be educated about it. That's all.
Edit...The key to all of this is reloading. I used to spend upwards of $2000 a year on match ammo. Two years ago, I broke down and bought reloading equipment. After the initial $600 for the equipment (press, scales, dies, etc.), and another $400 on various reloading components (powders, primers, bullets), I haven't spent a dime. I've gone from spending $2000 a year, to less than $200 a year. Plus, I get the versatility to "cook-up" some neat loads of my own.