Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 6/27/2002 5:42:05 AM EDT
Seems like everyone makes an integrally supressed ruger MKII, but I really haven't seen any buckmarks around.  I find this sort of strange because the pistols themselves seem to be nearly as prolific as the rugers, and I much prefer the brownings.  Is there any particular reason for this?  

If someone does make them, is it possible to just order the integrally supressed barrel, since barrel swapping seems to be an easy DIY drop in replacement?  Are there any other alterations necessary? What would be considered the NFA part in this case?  It seems the firearm itself is the registered part with most integrally supressed guns, but when a barrel swap is so easy, can the barrel itself be the registered part and the gun remain title I?

TIA,
Rocko
Link Posted: 6/27/2002 7:06:51 AM EDT
[#1]
I've never seen an integrally supressed Buckmark, but I suppose it could be done.  If the barrel can be swapped out easily, you could have an integral supressor mounted on a barrel, and that would be the registered part.
Link Posted: 7/25/2002 5:24:34 PM EDT
[#2]
John Norrell in Arkansas has done a lot of work for me.  He says that he has done the Buckmark.

His email is [email protected]
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top