Quoted: ...stainless will have the shortest life. Nobody chrome lines stainless barrels (I don't even think its possible).
|
What are we talking about here? Barrel bore erosion? What is the demand on the barrel, in other words what is it's purpose for? That's like saying an apple is better than an orange because I like apple juice better... It's all relative.
Sorry to jump in late but I can confirm the Navy's testing of 416SS barrels, and the fact that they love them. If it weren't for a bunch of tired old generals who had their M16's rust up because they were sent to Southeast Asia with brand new, unchrome lined chromemoly steel barreled M16's and NO CLEANING KITS, or training on how to clean them, and were then supplied ammunition that made so much carbon that acid was forming in the monsoon moistened barrels within minutes, the whole of DoD would be purchasing SS barrels.
I have seen 416 SS barrels with 60K rounds through them, and still able to shoot 1.5 moa. Conversely, I have yet to see any chrome lined (to military specs) barrel go beyond 600 rounds of sustained full auto fire, or 1,000 rounds of intermittent full auto, and not have the chrome in the bore fail miserably, which is exactly why the SopMod people are trying desperately to get the old crusties to buy SS barrels.
Additionally, I went to the web site that Dave S. mentioned. I can't say I, or we at Safari Arms have experienced the same thing. And we have been in business for longer than 10 years or so. I also noticed that after all of his personal opinions on barrels steel, that he than introduces the greatest thing in barrel steel, that of course, can only be had from him. But, hey, maybe it is better, I can't say. You be the judge.
Tom S.
Oly Arms