Quoted: Allow me to complicate issues here. According to the ATF themselves, an SBR is not an SBR unless it has a short barrel on it. What say you?
NFA Handbook, Chapter 2.1.6
Of all the different firearms defined as NFA weapons, machineguns are the only type where the receiver of the weapon by itself is an NFA firearm.
Gotta love that handbook. |
Respectfully, I would say you are taking that out of context. It is in the middle of a page of text explaining how to identify which part of a receiver is the registered part. (Interestingly, the very same page says that on an FNC, the
lower is the registered part, and this week BATFE reversed itself and now the
upper is the registered part. So much for the handbook's enduring accuracy.) An assemblage of Title 1 parts in a certain configuration is required to meet SBS/SBS/AOW registration, but the receiver is the serial-numbered item by which the registered assemblage is registered.
There is also a Tech Branch letter dated July 2007, floating around on the internet, that says if an SBR is temporarily reconfigured to Title 1 dimensions, it can be transported interstate without a 5320.20. But as we all know, Tech Branch letters are only relevant and legally useful to the person to whom the letter is addressed.
And to take this a step further, Illinois is one of the states which frequently challenges the feds on the interstate transportation provisions of FOPA '86. I really would not like to be an individual who lives in Illinois and is caught in possession of a firearm whose receiver is still listed in the NFA Registry as an SBR. Very, very bad juju.
My take is, when dealing with federal firearms law, it is always better to err on the side of caution. Making a mistake, or misunderstanding or misinterpreting a regulation, can cost you your right to ever own
any firearm for the rest of your life.
So I would not transport the receiver of a registered NFA item interstate without an approved 5320.20 in hand. Your Mileage May Vary.