Quoted: As much as I would love to see it, it won't bring us back to the "buy a thompson at the hardware store" days, but the fact of the matter is that it is not "easy" by any means to own a machinegun. The limiting factor today is artificially inflated prices due to the closing of the MG registry. And quite frankly we shouldn't have to give a shit about what the public thinks of it. There is this amendment in the constitution, something about shall not be infringed. The public still thinks we can buy machineguns anyways, have you caught any of the assault weapon pieces that the news makes? They show videos of full autos like any gangbanger can walk in the local gun store and buy one.
I don't understand why some people believe this is a pipedream, is it really that hard to imagine with the progress that has been made as of late? People are becoming more informed. CCW is now in effect in most States, the AW ban died with a whimper, we can buy SBRs and Silencers and pre-86 MGs, why is it that getting Section 922(o) declared unconstitutional such a impossible feat? |
I agree, This case can go 3 ways:
1. DC residents can win big and we all can win a little.
2. We can all win really big.
3. We can all lose really big.
The plaintff(s) and their counsel were very wise in this case to bring the issue STRICTLY as a violation of the 2nd Amendment. The DC govt's warped argument thus far has been that there is no 2nd Amendment in DC because the 2nd Am. only applies to a state's right to have a militia and DC is not a state.
The DC Circuit court disagreed and said the DC handgun ban is unconstitutional because the 2nd Am. DOES guarantee an individual's right to keep and bear arms. The DC govt. is appealing that ruling. IF THE SCOTUS TAKES THE CASE, THE ISSUE BEFORE THEM WILL BE A 2ND AMENDMENT CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE. They will finally have to answer the big question once and for all. "Does the 2nd Amendment guarantee an individual's right to keep and bear arms?" Yes or No?
This is what we all want, and if they take the case and we win, it will be a great day for freedom. If they take the case and we lose, then we all lose really big. If SCOTUS doesn't take the case, the residents in DC still win their right to handguns back, which would be good for all of us, too, because the DC Circuit court's rulings are very influential in other courts around the country.
I for one, am very optimistic about this, either way.
And yes, if an individual's right to keep and bear arms is affirmed by SCOTUS, I think it would serve as a good basis to challenge 922(o), and other state & city AW / handgun bans.