User Panel
Posted: 9/15/2009 2:40:58 PM EDT
Read this today:
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/09/army_new_camo_091409w/ We talk a lot on here about camo-patterns. How bad ACU sucks, how great Multicam is, about the new AOR-1/2, and how the army needs a new pattern. I like ACU, but it's not even close to the best pattern for it's intended "universal" purpose. We all know how great multicam is supposed to be. Now the Army has a deadline of Sept 30th to find a new pattern after continuous complaints from soldiers about the performance of the ACU pattern. Looking at the UCP-Delta pattern it just looks like stained ACUs. Better than the standard UCP but only marginally. What do you THINK that the Army will field? I don't think most soldiers will be happy until we field multicam because of the cool factor if nothing else. But, will the Army really field a pattern that they didn't design in-house? As an aside, wasn't the Army testing a set of mountain-combat ACUs? Basically the Crye combat uniforms in UCP? I think the Crye uniforms in multi-cam would be the best combat uniform the Army could issue, but we'll likely end up with just ACUs in multicam pattern. If they do swap to Multi-cam there will be a ton of ACU pattern gear for sale CHEAP! |
|
More pics of the UCP Delta here:
http://soldiersystems.net/2009/09/15/afghanistan-camo-testing-announced/ |
|
Man, that looks like butt. You'd think they'd catch a fucking clue and take notice of what some units and organizations are choosing to wear.
|
|
Well, according to the Army TImes, it is down to multicam and that UCP-Delta abomonation. We'll see how it goes. We should have some sort of answer by the end of the year.
|
|
Quoted:
Well, according to the Army TImes, it is down to multicam and that UCP-Delta abomonation. We'll see how it goes. We should have some sort of answer by the end of the year. It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, according to the Army TImes, it is down to multicam and that UCP-Delta abomonation. We'll see how it goes. We should have some sort of answer by the end of the year. It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D. Yeah. Soldiers are gonna be pissed if it's UCP-D. I wonder how the commercial gear market will react to the decision? Will they drop UCP altogether like they did with Woodland or if multicam will be cheaper than now for soldiers? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, according to the Army TImes, it is down to multicam and that UCP-Delta abomonation. We'll see how it goes. We should have some sort of answer by the end of the year. It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D. You're probably right, but it's frustrating as fuck to see them keep getting this wrong. Why they have this hard-on for a "universal" pattern I don't know. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, according to the Army TImes, it is down to multicam and that UCP-Delta abomonation. We'll see how it goes. We should have some sort of answer by the end of the year. It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D. You're probably right, but it's frustrating as fuck to see them keep getting this wrong. Why they have this hard-on for a "universal" pattern I don't know. It is digital- it is high-tech. It MUST be better! |
|
Joker581
It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. |
|
Quoted: Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D. Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. the marines did good |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. the marines did good No shit! How is it they nailed it the first time but the Army can't figure it out after, what ten year?! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. the marines did good Marines I believe got their patterns from the Army's original trial. Army developed the desert and woodland digital patterns but opted instead for a universal pattern. While a universal pattern is a noble goal, it's pretty unrealistic. We do need multicam in the Army. UCP has run it's course. I still dig multicam and 3-color desert. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. the marines did good No shit! How is it they nailed it the first time but the Army can't figure it out after, what ten year?! The Marines never got stuck on the idea that there is such a thing as one pattern that works everywhere. |
|
They didn't choose MultiCam the first time they had the opportunity because it "wasn't invented here". Look for UCP-D to get the nod. Hope I am wrong, but if internal politics play into it again, MultiCam will continue to be a "special uses" camo.
Just my uneducated opinion. |
|
Quoted:
They didn't choose MultiCam the first time they had the opportunity because it "wasn't invented here". Look for UCP-D to get the nod. Hope I am wrong, but if internal politics play into it again, MultiCam will continue to be a "special uses" camo. Just my uneducated opinion. That's what I think. But, why won't higher listen to us. I understand why the HK416 wasn't adopted. It wasn't enough of a revolution to justify spending the money. Well, UCP-D is to UCP as M4 is to 416. It's stupid and probably while more effective than UCP, it isn't revolutionary enough to justify spending money on it. If leadership wants to boost morale and confidence, a simple change like multicam would do wonders. We're getting commercial stuff all the time, outside contractors are developing some amazing stuff, but why can't the same be true of camouflage? |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. the marines did good Marines I believe got their patterns from the Army's original trial. Army developed the desert and woodland digital patterns but opted instead for a universal pattern. While a universal pattern is a noble goal, it's pretty unrealistic. We do need multicam in the Army. UCP has run it's course. I still dig multicam and 3-color desert. MARCORSYSCOM ran trials in 2000 for a new uniform. They tested a bunch of patterns and color variations (one of my Platoon Sergeants was in the Basic Sniper Course at Quantico and participated in some of them) and ended up using a pattern developed from the Canadian's CADPAT with colors similar to old tiger stripes for the woodland, and then developed the desert pattern off that with testing out at 29 Palms during CAX. Online survey's were also conducted, and contributed to some of the uniform features. The big Army needs to wake up and smell the coffee- a single universal pattern is a pipe dream. |
|
In the same Army Times article they say that if UCP-D is adopted Rep. Fuller says that we will still be using UCP body armor which to me kind of defeats the purpose of spending millions up on millions of $$$ if the UCP is so bad, and I think that it does need improvement, then why not scrap it all together rather than leave it in body armor, packs, camelbaks, etc. Just does not make much sense to me which probably means that is just what we will be doing. On page 4 of the same Army Times issue I thought that a SSG had a good idea. His idea was to take satelitte photos from likely battlegrounds i.e. Middle East and Afganistan at the current time and take the colors from those satelitte imagery and designate them onto a camo. pattern. It could not be much worse than the current situation we are in.
|
|
Quoted:
In the same Army Times article they say that if UCP-D is adopted Rep. Fuller says that we will still be using UCP body armor which to me kind of defeats the purpose of spending millions up on millions of $$$ if the UCP is so bad, and I think that it does need improvement, then why not scrap it all together rather than leave it in body armor, packs, camelbaks, etc. Just does not make much sense to me which probably means that is just what we will be doing. On page 4 of the same Army Times issue I thought that a SSG had a good idea. His idea was to take satelitte photos from likely battlegrounds i.e. Middle East and Afganistan at the current time and take the colors from those satelitte imagery and designate them onto a camo. pattern. It could not be much worse than the current situation we are in. Here's my read on it, the big Army will choose the UCP-D because they think it will get the clowns in DC to get off their backs, and they can still use the UCP pattern gear with it and not break the bank on a whole new kit of everything. |
|
That UCP-D looks horrible.
My guess is they will pick Multicam because it's used by some Spec Ops and Ranger Units and the Army tends to follow the lead of the Special Forces and Ranger Units. Like they did with the Beret being issued to everyone. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In the same Army Times article they say that if UCP-D is adopted Rep. Fuller says that we will still be using UCP body armor which to me kind of defeats the purpose of spending millions up on millions of $$$ if the UCP is so bad, and I think that it does need improvement, then why not scrap it all together rather than leave it in body armor, packs, camelbaks, etc. Just does not make much sense to me which probably means that is just what we will be doing. On page 4 of the same Army Times issue I thought that a SSG had a good idea. His idea was to take satelitte photos from likely battlegrounds i.e. Middle East and Afganistan at the current time and take the colors from those satelitte imagery and designate them onto a camo. pattern. It could not be much worse than the current situation we are in. Here's my read on it, the big Army will choose the UCP-D because they think it will get the clowns in DC to get off their backs, and they can still use the UCP pattern gear with it and not break the bank on a whole new kit of everything. Yeah I see that happening as well to. The rock stars still get to pick what they want but big green won't get serious on the issue for the regular troops and support crews. They'll only do what it takes to get the poloticos off their backs. Not what it takes to really take care of the plain folks in the dirt. ETA: I hope I'm wrong, really and truly. But I don't see the Army publicly admitting UCP was a mistake (if they go with MC). |
|
I "heard" that Army units in the next 6 months will be receiving a uniform similar to Desert Marpat for deployments until a suitable choice can be found.
Take that at face value I would almost just expect them to follow the Corps. Run a desert and woodland with brown kit... Almost makes sense. |
|
Quoted:
I "heard" that Army units in the next 6 months will be receiving a uniform similar to Desert Marpat for deployments until a suitable choice can be found. Take that at face value I would almost just expect them to follow the Corps. Run a desert and woodland with brown kit... Almost makes sense. Yep, the answer is staring them in the face- MARPAT woodland/desrt, AOR 1/2, etc. |
|
Personally I'm happy with the fact that they haven't gone to MC, I don't want to look like a poseur with all my MC stuff on any more than I already do
AOR camo's are what would make the most sense, or just changing the coloration of the UCP to something that exists in nature. (NOT just adding big mud splotches.) |
|
Quoted:
Personally I'm happy with the fact that they haven't gone to MC, I don't want to look like a poseur with all my MC stuff on any more than I already do AOR camo's are what would make the most sense, or just changing the coloration of the UCP to something that exists in nature. (NOT just adding big mud splotches.) Yeah, so you don't want the best possible tool to go to soldiers because range-monekys would look like posers. yeah... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Personally I'm happy with the fact that they haven't gone to MC, I don't want to look like a poseur with all my MC stuff on any more than I already do AOR camo's are what would make the most sense, or just changing the coloration of the UCP to something that exists in nature. (NOT just adding big mud splotches.) Yeah, so you don't want the best possible tool to go to soldiers because range-monekys would look like posers. yeah... I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic. If not, he should go hang himself or something. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I "heard" that Army units in the next 6 months will be receiving a uniform similar to Desert Marpat for deployments until a suitable choice can be found. Take that at face value I would almost just expect them to follow the Corps. Run a desert and woodland with brown kit... Almost makes sense. Yep, the answer is staring them in the face- MARPAT woodland/desrt, AOR 1/2, etc. I think AOR1/2/ is the only logical 'political' choice the Army can make. The Army would never adopt a USMC developed pattern. They'll start to phase in UCP-D patten uniforms, using the same armor/web gear, and then a few years later they'll decide to use AOR 1 & 2. They can save face since it's an "Army-developed" pattern. |
|
I have this strange feeling that we are going to get the monkey poop ucp delta uniform. The reports from the field will be Multicam reigns supreme in Afghanistan, but the brass won't listen to it. They want an Army made camo pattern. They want a digital pattern. My only concern is this. Why are we sending a pattern that has no science, no field testing, no data, no anything in a combat zone to test??????? Why are we risking the lives of good Soldiers so bureaucrats can continue to make money for their retirement funds? I would have rather the Army used the DCU vs Multicam instead of the UCP Delta. How many Soldiers do we have to lose to realize that a Universal Camo Pattern sucks??????
|
|
Quoted:
I have this strange feeling that we are going to get the monkey poop ucp delta uniform. The reports from the field will be Multicam reigns supreme in Afghanistan, but the brass won't listen to it. They want an Army made camo pattern. They want a digital pattern. My only concern is this. Why are we sending a pattern that has no science, no field testing, no data, no anything in a combat zone to test??????? Why are we risking the lives of good Soldiers so bureaucrats can continue to make money for their retirement funds? I would have rather the Army used the DCU vs Multicam instead of the UCP Delta. How many Soldiers do we have to lose to realize that a Universal Camo Pattern sucks?????? Because in their eyes these poor souls are expendable. I don't think much of Multicam but ACU/UCP is by far worse. Sadly I believe they will throw on the mud stains, rip the tax payers a new one and sacrifice soldiers to "try it out". All this in the name of making a buck because like it or not war is an industry and the workers(our soldiers) and the consumers(the enemy) are not of any concern to the profiteers. That being said the Marines got it right and I don't understand why all the various branches having to have their own special camo(seems a bit childish)these types of logistic(or lack thereof) I thought were dealt with in WWII with all the various weapons issuing and getting the ammo for those. I digress, Politicians make money, and soldiers get killed. |
|
Quoted:
Joker581 It would be awesome if they went with Multicam, but I have to believe that the Army will make the wrong choice and adopt UCP-D.
Sadly your are most likely correct... We have not had a good track record of picking camo patterns since we retired the Woodland BDU's... Just look at the original "chocolate chip" desert pattern and how they had to revise it until they got a good pattern. Chocolate Chip was a good pattern for rock deserts, just not the Arabian sand desert. |
|
UCP-D reminds me of Homer building that reactor model with tailfins. UGH!!!!
|
|
All they have to do is take an existing patten and add color to it. Gee, I wonder if they will choose multicam? It's all aout the money anyways.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I "heard" that Army units in the next 6 months will be receiving a uniform similar to Desert Marpat for deployments until a suitable choice can be found. Take that at face value I would almost just expect them to follow the Corps. Run a desert and woodland with brown kit... Almost makes sense. Yep, the answer is staring them in the face- MARPAT woodland/desrt, AOR 1/2, etc. I agree with this, but I also think that the Army brass is to stuck on the idea of a universal digital camo and to proud to consider anything out of house; or soldiers would alrea be using Marpat or Multicam or probably the best camouflage British DPM. |
|
All of you are forgetting the real concern of High Ranking SGMs and Generals; How will this uniform look on Soliders in garrison.
This is all they really care about. |
|
Well, all I can say in my first post on the AR15 forums is at least its not the Awesome ABU. I'll save the bashing for another day though.
|
|
Quoted:
Well, all I can say in my first post on the AR15 forums is at least its not the Awesome ABU. I'll save the bashing for another day though. Yeah, no agrument there. The Chiefs really did a doozie on ya'll. |
|
Quoted:
All of you are forgetting the real concern of High Ranking SGMs and Generals; How will this uniform look on Soliders in garrison. This is all they really care about. In which case I would think they would choose multicam as opposed to having soldiers walking around who look like they spent the night out, slept in their uniforms and puked and shat over themselves in the morning... Or at least thats what I hope they think... |
|
I am of the understanding that multicam wasn't chosen because the pattern was trademarked and the Army didn't want to pay a royalty for every uniform. Which is funny considering they payed a royalty on every Colt M16 they bought.
|
|
Quoted:
I am of the understanding that multicam wasn't chosen because the pattern was trademarked and the Army didn't want to pay a royalty for every uniform. Which is funny considering they payed a royalty on every Colt M16 they bought. as far as i can tell, that's just a rumor. Ive yet to find any evidence of that being true except some people who have "inside knowledge that they heard from a friends of a friend of a cousin, who's brothers best friend heard from a soldier who read it some where". and besides didn't the Army jointly develope the Scorpion( the name of Multicam at the time) pattern with crye? |
|
Multicam pattern is trademarked thoug. thats why a lot of gear distributor won't carry the pattern.
|
|
I understand the trademark issue...
but they could use MC color in ACU digital pattern |
|
Quoted:
I understand the trademark issue... but they could use MC color in ACU digital pattern X-Camo? |
|
I'm rooting for the Multicam
I love that stuff I will go into combat in my PTs or my boxers before I go in that UCP-delta crap |
|
Quoted:
All of you are forgetting the real concern of High Ranking SGMs and Generals; How will this uniform look on Soliders in garrison. This is all they really care about. more like how will they look with those stupid ass berets....... in a formation for 4 hours during a brigade change of command. |
|
I just want Multicam.
Whatever they do...I'd like them to authorize it for everywhere...and I'd buy my own...happy as can be in my MC. But choosing MC would be great for effectiveness...GREATER for our morale. |
|
Quoted:
I just want Multicam. Whatever they do...I'd like them to authorize it for everywhere...and I'd buy my own...happy as can be in my MC. But choosing MC would be great for effectiveness...GREATER for our morale. And the folks in charge of the selection process care how much about the morale(much less the effectivness) of the groundpounders? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.