Quoted: Perhaps you should have turned in your gun for repair instead of hurting the gun manufacturer and weaking the gun industry and gun owners.
|
WTF? Remington produced some barrels with problems. Remington agreed to those who purchased the weapons basically a refund or post-purchase price reduction. Had the weapons been returned it would have cost Remington more in materials & labor and that would have caused what you described! A replacement barrel is a lot more than $40.00 even back then.
IIRC... the problem involved very few weapons or was barrel finish related (I can't recall, but at the time I was responsible for weapons maintenance and I was not concerned about allowing an unsafe weapon on the street because of the recall/class action suit) and had it to do with safety they would not let you keep a barrel that would blow up and give you $40.00 to do so!