Quoted: Glock. Sorry, but I have yet to meet with a reliable 1911. I know they exist, but IN MY EXPERIENCE, they're a rare beast.
ETA: Your question was about reliability--so my answer is Glock. If you want pretty, if you want historic, if you want all-American, than 1911. If you want reliable at a reasonable price....Glock.
|
Clearly you haven't "left the house much" if you have yet to "meet" a reliable 1911 with regards to whatever experience you had. As for your edit, you should have quit while you were behind. He asked about a reliable 1911, not reliability in general.
As for my "experience" I have a good 30,000 rounds of trigger time on 1911s (if time and student budget permitted it would be 4 times this easily) and I have NEVER had reliability issues with 3 of my 4 1911s to date, all of which are of different size, manufacture, and age. The only one I have had reliability issues with was a 3.5" compact (which was a nightmare), but it is well established that 1911s chopped this short are not reliable pistols by design.
If you have a 1911 with a 4" barrel or larger that is not reliable, then one (or both) of two possibilities has occurred:
1. You bought a cheap weapon by a company that does not manufacture their weapons to spec/ proper tolerances (piece of shit by manufacturer)
2. You bought a weapon from a reputable company that overlooked the defective part(s)/workmanship which occurs with ANY reputable manufacturer, but is more noticable in 1911s because 1911s are far more prevelant and vastly popular American companies skimp on QC then make it up on the back end with warranty/cust service.
Otherwise, the reliability factor of 1911s is more than sufficient in the nightstand or in the field. Screw whatever civillian applications you might consider (SWAT, etc)... if they were not reliable, Special forces would NEVER have procured new 1911s once they were outed for the M9.
ETA: Given the popularity of 1911s, imagine the mag market. We have ARs that run flawlessly with battered 1970 issue USGI 20s (originally considered a disposable field piece) or with USGI 30s. Then you have the horrifying mags from Ramline, USA, etc that don't work for shit. Then there's the plastics (orlite/thermold) where accounts vary, and so on.
The 1911 magazine is undeniably sound. Improvements have been made, but nothing revolutionary had occured nor was necessary. I have owned/used Wilsons, Colt, CMC, Kimber, and Para (single stack) magazines. The 2 mag problems I have ever experienced are as follows: CMC- one magazine out of spec... slide won't lock with it; Para - the floorplate ruptured sending a hail of hydrashoks all over the living room (faulty welding of the floorplate).
Moral of the ETA: if you know how/what to by magwise for your AR/1911, you won't have any problems.