I am currently debating between a major purchase of a handgun. I know that the general Ar15.com advice is to get everything that you are thinking about, but I honestly cannot afford to get both. I have enough money to get one or the other.
I am deciding between a HK Mark 23 and a high quality 1911 (Wilson, Yost-Bonitz, Nighthawk, Ed Brown, etc.).
Here are the pros and cons of each as I see them:
I personally like every HK pistol that I have ever shot so I am not buying based solely upon their reputation. I have never had a problem with any of the HK's that I shot and find them to be very reliable. I am also impressed with the ruggedness of the pistol. The Mark 23 grip, although large, fits me very well and I like the way that the controls are arranged. I like the O-ring design and I think that it is very innovative. I have never heard a bad thing mentioned about these guns.
As for the 1911's, I like the 1911's I have shot. They have always been more accurate then I am when shooting them. I believe that there is a big difference in an out of the box Colt or Springfield and a 1911 where a number of the parts are hand fit to the gun and are match grade. My biggest fear with one of these high quality 1911's is that I would be afraid to really use the gun. I would be worried about getting scratches and such on it, where I don't have that concern with the HK.
I realize that once I purchase either one of these guns, I will pretty much be stuck with it. It will be very difficult for me to sell these guns if I decided to since they are not very liquid. I want to make the right decision.